ON
← Back to feed
Supreme Court judge blows up Alvise's attempt to make his cryptocurrencies untraceable
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

Supreme Court judge blows up Alvise's attempt to make his cryptocurrencies untraceable

The Spanish Supreme Court judge, Julián Sánchez Melgar, has rejected a request by far-right European Parliament member Alvise Pérez to block the investigation into his cryptocurrency wallet activity related to his 2024 European Parliament campaign financing. The ruling confirms police access to his virtual wallets and information requests directed at his party and the Court of Accounts, initiated by the PSOE acting as public prosecutor. The judge argues these measures are necessary for the ongoing investigation into Pérez, who allegedly received 100,000 euros in cash from crypto entrepreneur Álvaro Romillo weeks before the election. Romillo is also under investigation for alleged crypto fraud. The court dismissed Pérez’s defense claim that he did not possess the 'seed phrase' needed to access the funds, noting he had previously expressed a need for uncontrollable funds to finance campaign activities. The judge ordered the party he founded, Se Acabó la Fiesta, to provide financial records and requested the Court of Accounts to supply documentation regarding their campaign finances. The European Parliament voted in May to revoke Pérez’s immunity to allow prosecution. The judge still待

The Spanish Supreme Court judge, Julián Sánchez Melgar, has rejected a request by far-right European Parliament member Alvise Pérez to block police investigations into his cryptocurrency wallets. In a ruling dated July 30, the judge confirmed that authorities will proceed with tracking the virtual wallets used by Pérez to receive anonymous donations, which were intended to bypass oversight by the Court of Accounts. The decision was made following a petition filed by the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE), acting as the public prosecutor, which sought to ensure transparency in funding related to Pérez’s campaign for the European elections in 2024. Pérez had argued that the investigation should be halted because he did not possess the “seed phrase,” a cryptographic key necessary to access the funds stored in the wallets. He claimed this meant he never held legal ownership or control over the assets. However, the judge dismissed this argument, noting that Pérez had previously communicated with the businessman Álvaro Romillo, who created three cryptocurrency wallets to facilitate anonymous donations. These communications, revealed by elDiario.es, showed that Pérez had requested funds that would allow him to finance campaign activities without being subject to scrutiny by the Court of Accounts. In addition to tracking the cryptocurrency wallets, the judge ordered the retrieval of financial records from Pérez’s political party, Se Acabó la Fiesta (SALF). This includes accounting documents, balance sheets, inventory reports, income and expense statements, and other financial movements linked to the 2024 European election campaign. The court also required the Court of Accounts to provide its audit report and all documentation submitted by SALF regarding these elections. The judge emphasized that these measures align with the objectives of the case, as authorized by the European Parliament, which voted earlier this year to strip Pérez of immunity so he could face prosecution. The judge also noted that the PSOE's request to review Pérez’s personal bank accounts since 2023 remains pending. Pérez’s defense had argued that such a measure would be overly broad and intrusive, restricting the investigation to the period between April 9 and June 9, 2024, when SALF operated as an electoral group before officially registering as a political party. The judge clarified that the PSOE’s request has yet to be resolved. Furthermore, the judge ruled against Pérez’s attempt to expedite the process and move directly to trial. His defense had cited the “public exposure” and “personal disruption” caused by ongoing judicial proceedings. The judge rejected this appeal, maintaining that the case requires further investigation before proceeding to trial. According to police records obtained by elDiario.es, Pérez visited one of Romillo’s companies on May 27, 2024, to collect 100,000 euros in cash shortly before the start of the campaign. Romillo is already under investigation for alleged cryptocurrency fraud, and both men are implicated in the current case. The police report indicates that Pérez had expressed a need for funds that would not be subject to the Court of Accounts’ oversight, a claim supported by their exchanged messages. The investigation continues as the court awaits additional evidence and responses from the parties involved.

1 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 783 days ago
Supreme Court judge blows up Alvise's attempt to make his cryptocurrencies untraceable

The Spanish Supreme Court judge, Julián Sánchez Melgar, has rejected a request by far-right European Parliament member Alvise Pérez to block the investigation into his cryptocurrency wallet activity related to his 2024 European Parliament campaign financing. The ruling confirms police access to his virtual wallets and information requests directed at his party and the Court of Accounts, initiated by the PSOE acting as public prosecutor. The judge argues these measures are necessary for the ongoing investigation into Pérez, who allegedly received 100,000 euros in cash from crypto entrepreneur Álvaro Romillo weeks before the election. Romillo is also under investigation for alleged crypto fraud. The court dismissed Pérez’s defense claim that he did not possess the 'seed phrase' needed to access the funds, noting he had previously expressed a need for uncontrollable funds to finance campaign activities. The judge ordered the party he founded, Se Acabó la Fiesta, to provide financial records and requested the Court of Accounts to supply documentation regarding their campaign finances. The European Parliament voted in May to revoke Pérez’s immunity to allow prosecution. The judge still待

Bias read (Center): The article presents the judicial decision and procedural arguments without overt ideological slant. It reports both the court's rejection of Pérez's appeal and the defense's claims, maintaining balance between the legal proceedings and the political implications. While the subject involves a far右翼議

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a court ruling rejecting an attempt by an ultra-right MEP to block cryptocurrency wallet tracking. It cites specific legal actions, names involved parties, and details the reasoning behind the court’s decision. The information aligns with typical reporting on such legal matter

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the court’s decision as a factual outcome, but uses emotionally charged terms like 'agitador ultra' (ultra agitator) and describes the defendant’s actions in a somewhat negative light. While it remains within the bounds of judicial reporting, there is a subtle bias toward portra

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories