The Spanish Supreme Court judge, Julián Sánchez Melgar, has rejected a request by far-right European Parliament member Alvise Pérez to block the investigation into his cryptocurrency wallet activity related to his 2024 European Parliament campaign financing. The ruling confirms police access to his virtual wallets and information requests directed at his party and the Court of Accounts, initiated by the PSOE acting as public prosecutor. The judge argues these measures are necessary for the ongoing investigation into Pérez, who allegedly received 100,000 euros in cash from crypto entrepreneur Álvaro Romillo weeks before the election. Romillo is also under investigation for alleged crypto fraud. The court dismissed Pérez’s defense claim that he did not possess the 'seed phrase' needed to access the funds, noting he had previously expressed a need for uncontrollable funds to finance campaign activities. The judge ordered the party he founded, Se Acabó la Fiesta, to provide financial records and requested the Court of Accounts to supply documentation regarding their campaign finances. The European Parliament voted in May to revoke Pérez’s immunity to allow prosecution. The judge still待
Bias read (Center): The article presents the judicial decision and procedural arguments without overt ideological slant. It reports both the court's rejection of Pérez's appeal and the defense's claims, maintaining balance between the legal proceedings and the political implications. While the subject involves a far右翼議
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a court ruling rejecting an attempt by an ultra-right MEP to block cryptocurrency wallet tracking. It cites specific legal actions, names involved parties, and details the reasoning behind the court’s decision. The information aligns with typical reporting on such legal matter
Why objectivity (78): The article presents the court’s decision as a factual outcome, but uses emotionally charged terms like 'agitador ultra' (ultra agitator) and describes the defendant’s actions in a somewhat negative light. While it remains within the bounds of judicial reporting, there is a subtle bias toward portra




