COThe article explores the paradox of modern democracy through the rise of charismatic leaders like Gustavo Petro and Abelardo de la Espriella, whose power stems partly from their magnetic appeal. It discusses how democratic systems, despite being built on laws and institutions, still yearn for extraordinary leaders who can unite divided societies. The piece suggests that while modern democracies have moved away from divine legitimacy, they haven’t fully severed the spiritual or mystical undercurrents historically tied to political power. Historical examples include religiously justified monarchies, such as those of the Safavid emperors or Buddhist kings, which were grounded in supernatural authority. The article questions why this search for charismatic leadership persists in the 21st century.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced historical and analytical perspective on the role of charisma in politics, without overtly favoring any particular ideological stance. It references both democratic principles and historical examples of non-democratic power structures, offering a nuanced view rather t
