ON
← Back to feed
The Government on alert for the revenue for Vox from the crisis in Ceuta: Abascal has already shot up in the polls after the announcement of the regularization of migrants
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative6 days ago

The Government on alert for the revenue for Vox from the crisis in Ceuta: Abascal has already shot up in the polls after the announcement of the regularization of migrants

The Spanish government has raised concerns over the potential electoral gains for Vox due to the migration crisis in Ceuta. Following the announcement of an extraordinary regularization process for undocumented foreigners in early January 2026, Vox saw a significant increase in voter intention, reaching 18.3% according to a February survey by Sigma Dos. Officials at La Moncloa are aware that Vox could benefit from the crisis, which aligns with their anti-immigration rhetoric. The government's recent messaging has focused on reducing subsidies for social entities in Ceuta, citing 'alliances with the ultra-right' that the PP has in other regions. Another Sigma Dos poll conducted before the mass arrival of migrants from Morocco showed that 54.9% of Spaniards were against legalizing the administrative status of foreign residents in Spain before December 31, 2025, with Vox supporters showing the highest rejection rate at 90.6%. European Union leaders, including Italy and Denmark, warned that such decisions could attract more immigrants and linked the crisis to perceptions that irregular entry might lead to legal residency, as well as limited 'hot returns' ruled by the Supreme Court. It

The Save Europe Act movement faced unexpected challenges during its initial demonstration in Barcelona on Saturday, August 22, 2026, as it fell far short of its anticipated turnout. The group, which advocates for the closure of European borders and mass deportations of immigrants, aimed to rally support in Spain, marking its first major step into the country. However, instead of gathering hundreds of supporters, the movement managed to attract only around 100 individuals, significantly below its expectations. This was in contrast to the approximately 300 people who attended a counter-protest organized by left-wing groups and local entities opposed to Save Europe Act’s stance. The protest took place in Plaza de Sant Jaume, a central location in Barcelona, which became the focal point for both demonstrations. Police forces, specifically the Mossos d'Esquadra, deployed a heavy security presence to prevent any potential clashes between the two opposing groups. Dozens of officers were stationed with barriers and vehicles forming a perimeter to separate the demonstrators. The police presence underscored concerns over public safety and the potential for unrest given the polarizing nature of the issues being discussed. Representatives of Save Europe Act arrived at the plaza shortly before 7 p.m., unfurling a massive banner measuring 20 meters by 20 meters, occupying one-third of the square. The banner bore the slogan "Remigration saves Europe," a key element of the movement's ideology. Among those present was Alberto Tarradas, a member of the Vox party in the Catalan Parliament. During the demonstration, participants chanted slogans such as "This is not immigration, it is invasion" and "Spain is Christian, not Muslim." One of the group’s spokespersons, Toni Estévez, claimed that demographic replacement was a proven phenomenon and called for reversing policies he argued were destroying European civilization. He also made derogatory remarks directed at Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. Following the demonstration, the Barcelona City Council announced plans to file complaints against some of the statements heard during the event with the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The council cited messages such as "Remigration saves Europe" and the chants "This is not immigration, it is invasion" and "Spain is Christian, not Muslim" as potentially constituting hate speech based on religious affiliation or ethnic origin. While affirming the right to demonstrate, the council emphasized that Barcelona would not remain neutral in the face of racism, xenophobia, or the targeting of specific communities. Save Europe Act emerged as a movement opposed to immigration, led at the European level by Austrian identity activist Martin Sellner and Dutch activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek. Its stated goal is to promote a sovereign, free, and secure Europe through the complete sealing of borders and the implementation of mass deportations. The movement argues that these measures are necessary to protect the "ethnic continuity" of native European populations against what it describes as "immigration of substitution." The most controversial aspect of Save Europe Act's platform is its advocacy for "remigration," which involves the mass deportation of immigrants deemed non-integrated or representing a "significant cultural or financial burden," including those legally residing in Europe. The movement has gained traction amid growing political tensions in Spain, particularly following the government's announcement of an extraordinary regularization process for foreign residents in early January 2026. This policy sparked a surge in Vox's voter intentions, with surveys indicating a significant increase in support for the party, attributed largely to its anti-immigration rhetoric. The crisis in Ceuta, where thousands of migrants entered Spain via maritime routes, has intensified political discourse surrounding immigration. Leaders from 22 of the EU's 27 countries issued a joint warning that decisions like Spain's regularization program could serve as "attraction factors" for further migration. The situation has also been linked to perceptions that irregular entry might eventually lead to legal residency, compounded by judicial rulings limiting immediate returns of undocumented migrants. As the crisis continues, the Spanish government faces mounting pressure to address the influx while balancing domestic political dynamics. The rise of far-right parties, notably Vox, has been closely tied to heightened media attention on immigration issues, a trend observed across Europe. With the political landscape increasingly polarized, the future trajectory of immigration policy in Spain remains uncertain, shaped by ongoing debates over national sovereignty, security, and humanitarian responsibilities.

Go to the primary sources (16)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

10 reports

El País logoEl PaísIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8512 days ago
Crime has no nationality, only circumstances

The article discusses how political exploitation of immigration often leads to discriminatory rhetoric against foreigners, accusing them of crimes such as violence against women, homicide, theft, and fraud. It highlights research by sociologist Jesús Sánchez Barricarte from Universidad Carlos III, who analyzed 5.6 million convictions between 2007 and 2023. By standardizing data, comparing Spanish and foreign offenders of the same age and gender, the study found a 48% reduction in the criminal disparity, with foreigners committing 1,294 crimes per 100,000 inhabitants compared to 675 for Spaniards. While the gap narrowed, the article notes that differences may still stem from factors like countries of origin, where some nations report lower crime rates than Spain.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue by highlighting systemic discrimination against immigrants through political rhetoric and presents research that challenges common stereotypes. The emphasis on reducing the 'criminality gap' through standardized data suggests a critique of xenophobic narratives, aligning

Why factuality (90): The article presents specific data from a study by Jesús Sánchez Barricarte analyzing 5.6 million court sentences between 2007 and 2023. It provides numerical comparisons between Spanish and foreign offenders after standardizing variables like age and gender. The numbers given are consistent with th

Why objectivity (85): The article uses neutral language overall but includes phrases such as 'frases incriminatorias' and 'identifica al extranjero con un delincuente,' which may imply bias in political discourse rather than presenting purely objective findings. While it reports the study's results fairly, the framing su

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The Save Europe Act movement pinches in its landing in Barcelona to demand the closure of borders and mass remigrations

Save Europe Act, a movement opposing mass immigration, held its first demonstration in Spain in Barcelona, gathering around 100 people. The event was marked by police presence due to anticipated counter-protests organized by leftist groups. Authorities deployed significant security forces to prevent clashes between the two opposing groups. Participants displayed a large banner advocating 'remigration saves Europe,' while speakers claimed demographic replacement is a proven fact and criticized current immigration policies. The Barcelona City Council has announced plans to report some of the slogans used during the event to authorities, citing them as potentially racist. The council, led by the PSC, supports freedom of assembly but opposes racism and xenophobia.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Save Europe Act as a controversial movement with extreme views, using terms like 'invasi�n' (invasion), 'demogr�fica' (demographic), and 'racista' (racist). It highlights the movement's alignment with far-right figures like Vox's Alberto Tarradas and emphasizes the city council's抨

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the Save Europe Act demonstration in Barcelona, mentioning the number of participants, police presence, and the political context. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the event's scale and purpose. However, it does not provide specific primary sources, so some

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the event from the perspective of Save Europe Act supporters, highlighting their demands and the police response. While factual, it frames the event as a significant political moment, potentially giving more weight to the movement's narrative than the opposing groups. The langua

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 608 days ago
The Government on alert for the revenue for Vox from the crisis in Ceuta: Abascal has already shot up in the polls after the announcement of the regularization of migrants

The Spanish government has raised concerns over the potential electoral gains for Vox due to the migration crisis in Ceuta. Following the announcement of an extraordinary regularization process for undocumented foreigners in early January 2026, Vox saw a significant increase in voter intention, reaching 18.3% according to a February survey by Sigma Dos. Officials at La Moncloa are aware that Vox could benefit from the crisis, which aligns with their anti-immigration rhetoric. The government's recent messaging has focused on reducing subsidies for social entities in Ceuta, citing 'alliances with the ultra-right' that the PP has in other regions. Another Sigma Dos poll conducted before the mass arrival of migrants from Morocco showed that 54.9% of Spaniards were against legalizing the administrative status of foreign residents in Spain before December 31, 2025, with Vox supporters showing the highest rejection rate at 90.6%. European Union leaders, including Italy and Denmark, warned that such decisions could attract more immigrants and linked the crisis to perceptions that irregular entry might lead to legal residency, as well as limited 'hot returns' ruled by the Supreme Court. It

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses the political implications of the migration crisis and the potential impact on Vox's electoral prospects, it presents information from both government actions and opposition viewpoints without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains balanced, presenting data from a

Why factuality (80): The article discusses the impact of the regularization policy on Vox’s popularity and includes survey data from Sigma Dos. While these claims are plausible, they rely on external surveys and lack direct sourcing from official channels. Some elements, such as the EU leaders’ response, are mentioned b

Why objectivity (60): The article has a clear political slant, emphasizing the potential electoral gains for Vox and criticizing the government’s policies. It uses terms like 'rédito' and 'antiinmigración' in a way that frames the situation as a political advantage for Vox, indicating a biased perspective.

El País logoEl PaísIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 75Objective 606 days ago
Migration crisis: Spanish policy is set in the right-wing extremist framework

The article discusses how the ongoing migration crisis in Spain, particularly around Ceuta, has intensified public attention and political discourse, creating favorable conditions for the rise of far-right parties like Vox. It references academic research showing that increased media focus on immigration, especially during crises, often strengthens anti-immigration parties. The piece highlights the broader European trend where far-right movements gain traction alongside rising concerns over immigration, citing examples such as Nigel Farage in the UK and other European countries. In Spain, while Vox currently holds 17% of the vote, the article suggests that the current climate could further boost its influence.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the migration crisis as a catalyst for strengthening far-right political forces, emphasizing the potential benefits for Vox. It uses terms like 'extreme right' and 'anti-immigration' in a way that aligns with conservative narratives. While it presents academic findings neutrally,

Why factuality (75): The article provides a reasonable analysis of the migration crisis and its political implications, though it does not directly reference the specific election results from the primary source document. It accurately describes the general trend of far-right parties benefiting from immigration issues b

Why objectivity (60): While the article attempts to be analytical, it still frames the situation through a progressive lens, emphasizing the negative impacts of far-right rhetoric without providing equal attention to alternative perspectives. It uses terms like 'extreme right' and 'anti-immigration' which can carry impli

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 65Objective 6014 days ago
The Andalusian government's decision on the migration crisis

The Andalusian government faces a complex political and legal dilemma due to its recent agreement with the far-right party Vox, which opposes any solidarity measures involving the redistribution of unaccompanied migrant minors among autonomous communities. This stance conflicts with a 2024 cooperation agreement between Andalusia and the autonomous city of Ceuta, under which both regions committed to assisting each other during migration crises. Under this agreement, Andalusia accepted around 40 children from Ceuta in July 2025 after Ceuta’s facilities became overcrowded. However, the new Vox-aligned policies could invalidate this collaboration, creating tension over whether Andalusia will uphold its previous commitments or adhere strictly to its current political alignment.

Bias read (Conservative): The article highlights the ideological shift of the Andalusian government toward opposing migrant redistribution, aligning with Vox’s hardline stance. It frames this opposition as a direct consequence of the political alliance with Vox, emphasizing the conflict between past cooperative agreements (e

Why factuality (65): The article discusses the political dilemma faced by the Andalusian government regarding migration policy, specifically referencing a collaboration agreement with Ceuta from 2024. It mentions the number of children received by the Junta and references a pact with Vox. However, there is no primary so

Why objectivity (60): The tone of the article leans towards presenting the political conflict and implications of the government’s stance, suggesting a bias toward the challenges faced by the Andalusian administration. While not overtly partisan, it frames the situation in a way that emphasizes the complexity and potenti

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 5013 days ago
The PP uses falsehoods and exaggerations to attack the Government for the crisis in Ceuta

The article discusses the political criticism from Spain's Popular Party (PP) against the government over the migration crisis in Ceuta, where thousands of people entered the city two weeks ago. The PP has been accused of spreading misinformation and exaggerations to attack the government's handling of the situation. PP leaders, including Miguel Tellado and Jaime de los Santos, have criticized the government's response as weak and delayed, while making claims about health crises and sexual assaults that have been contradicted by official data. The Ministry of Health reported that hospital capacity was not exceeded and that daily medical visits had decreased. The article highlights the PP's strategy of stoking fear among residents regarding foreign migrants, which aligns with broader conservative tactics of using xenophobia for political gain.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the PP's actions as deliberate misinformation and exaggeration, portraying them as politically motivated to incite fear and support their agenda. The emphasis on the PP's alleged manipulation of facts and the portrayal of the government as ineffective aligns with a right-leaning倾向

Why factuality (65): The article discusses political attacks by the PP against the government over the Ceuta crisis but does not reference the primary source document about the failed return agreement with Morocco. It focuses on political accusations rather than factual reporting on migration policies or legal framework

Why objectivity (50): The tone is clearly partisan, accusing the government of 'falsedades' and 'exageraciones'. The article frames the opposition's actions as justified while presenting the government's response negatively, showing clear bias towards the PP.

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 30Objective 4013 days ago
The agenda of the international far right hijacks Spanish politics

The article discusses how the international far-right agenda, particularly the concept of 'priority national,' has increasingly influenced Spanish politics, especially through the policies of the Vox party and its alignment with other far-right movements. It highlights how leaders like Alberto Núñez Feijóo have adopted this framework in regional governance agreements, emphasizing the prioritization of native citizens over immigrants in access to public services. The piece traces the origins of the 'priority national' idea back to France, where Jean-Marie Le Pen popularized it as part of his nationalist ideology. The article argues that this ideological shift reflects a broader trend in European far-right politics, with Spain’s conservative parties adopting similar strategies to address perceived threats to national identity. It also critiques the lack of a strong democratic counter-narrative and the inability of leftist forces to effectively challenge these narratives.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the adoption of 'priority national' by Spanish conservative politicians as a continuation of a broader international far-right movement, drawing parallels between Spain, France, Hungary, and Argentina. It emphasizes the influence of far-right rhetoric and policies, portraying them

Why factuality (30): The article discusses the influence of international far-right agendas but does not mention the creation of the new Argentine ministry under Milei or Sturzenegger. It focuses on Spain and Vox, making it unrelated to the primary source document. The facts presented are not aligned with the event desc

Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'secuestra la política' and frames the discussion around far-right influence in a biased manner. It presents the situation as if the far-right is dominating political discourse without providing balanced perspectives.

ABC (España) logoABC (España)IndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 3512 days ago
Paco Castañares 'fulminates' the Minister of Health after what was seen in Ceuta with the question that many ask themselves: Listen, it's alright

On August 17, 2026, Spanish health minister Mónica García visited Ceuta and denied claims of a 'health crisis' in the autonomous city, while rejecting the idea that immigration is linked to disease. Her remarks sparked controversy, particularly regarding her characterization of such concerns as 'unfair and xenophobic.' The discussion was featured on the Spanish TV show 'En boca de todos,' where former socialist leader Paco Castañares criticized García's stance, reflecting broader public skepticism about the government's handling of healthcare and migration issues.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of Minister García as a legitimate public concern, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize fairness and oppose xenophobia. Paco Castañares, a former socialist, represents a left-wing figure who challenges the minister’s position, suggesting the article

Why factuality (30): This article focuses on political commentary regarding health minister Mónica García's visit to Ceuta and her denial of a healthcare crisis. It does not address the primary source document or any related facts about child migration agreements between Spain and Morocco.

Why objectivity (35): The article presents a biased view of the minister's statements, using emotionally charged language and framing the discussion in a partisan manner. It lacks balance by only presenting one perspective.

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 17Objective 257 days ago
Putting Yourself in Another's Place

The article discusses various political issues across different countries. In Spain, Feijóo argues that the Law of the Minor cannot apply to children in Ceuta because they 'participated in an invasion,' suggesting they are responsible for entering another country illegally. This stance contrasts with Teresa Rodríguez’s perspective, who highlights the institutionalized racism against 500 Moroccan girls compared to the 350,000 Ukrainian children welcomed into Spain. The article also notes the rise of far-right parties in Israel, including the potential threat to Benjamin Netanyahu’s power. Additionally, it mentions Israeli Minister Ben Gvir announcing plans for an execution facility for Palestinians under a death penalty law. Other topics include election controversies in Colombia and Argentina, where Milei blames feminists for societal issues, and regional politics in Spain involving Ayuso appointing former politicians to advisory roles with significant financial benefits.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation in Spain through a critical lens, emphasizing institutionalized racism and contrasting policies toward different groups of children. It criticizes the PP and Vox for their hardline stances on immigration and highlights the rise of far-left voices like Teresa Rodríguz

Why factuality (17): This article contains highly inaccurate and misleading information. It falsely claims Feijóo said children from Ceuta 'participated in an invasion,' which is not supported by any primary source. The article also invents details such as 'the age penalty for the PP president being a few months of life

Why objectivity (25): The article uses emotionally charged language ('racismo', 'gobierno de los peores seres', '💩 de gente') and takes a strongly biased stance against right-wing policies while praising left-wing actions. It presents a one-sided narrative without presenting opposing viewpoints or contextualizing events

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservative6 days ago
PP and Vox encourage racist discourse in Ceuta and demand the Government break the law by returning minors

The article discusses the rise of racist and xenophobic rhetoric by Spain's conservative parties, specifically the People's Party (PP) and Vox, during the humanitarian crisis caused by thousands of migrants entering Ceuta from Morocco. The parties have used inflammatory language to describe migrants as disease carriers, criminals, and invaders, while pushing for the illegal deportation of minors despite legal protections. They have also attempted to stoke fear among residents by highlighting the lack of resources and the potential for security issues. The article notes that experts dispute these claims, emphasizing that migrants do not bring diseases but rather contract them due to poor conditions, and that mass deportation would be legally invalid. Some leaders have faced criticism for their remarks, including a call to 'fish' migrants from the sea and accusations of sexual abuse against young women.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the actions and rhetoric of PP and Vox as extreme and racially charged, using terms like 'invasores', 'ladrones', and 'violadores'. It highlights their push for illegal deportation of minors and their attempts to inflame public fear. These elements reflect a right-leaning framing,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories