Congress sanctions Vito Quiles and Bertrand Ndongo again and withdraws their accreditation for another month

elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday

The Spanish Congress has renewed sanctions against ultra-right activists Bertrand Ndongo and Vito Quiles, revoking their press credentials for another month. This marks the second formal sanction against Quiles, who previously received a three-month suspension in May for disrupting press conferences and violating regulations by recording and sharing unauthorized footage of former President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Ndongo, meanwhile, received his first formal sanction after interrupting a press conference in November 2023. The Congress cited a significant deterioration in press room conditions and an increase in complaints against both activists. While the ruling was supported by PSOE and Sumar, it was opposed by the PP. The decision reflects ongoing efforts to regulate disruptive behavior within parliamentary institutions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the actions and rulings of the Congress regarding two activists without overtly endorsing or condemning their political affiliations. It reports on procedural decisions made by the Congress, including the application of rules and penalties, while maintaining neutrality in its ph

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article provides detailed information about the renewed sanctions against Quiles and Ndongo, including previous actions and the reasoning behind the current measures. It aligns with the cross-source consensus. However, the language uses terms like 'agitadores de extrema derecha' which may imply

El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 65yesterday

The Congress has again sanctioned Vito Zoppellari Quiles, extending his press accreditation suspension by a month, which will prevent him from accessing the lower house in September. The decision follows an incident on February 10th, where Quiles interrupted a press conference led by Podemos leader Ione Belarra. Sources within the parliament indicate that this action was taken due to his disruptive behavior during the event.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the sanctioning of Vito Quiles as a consequence of his disruptive actions at a political event, but does not explicitly frame the issue as partisan or take a clear ideological stance. It reports the factual outcome of the sanction and the reason behind it without overtly favorit

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): This article confirms the sanctioning of Quiles but frames it as an attempt to remove his accreditation permanently. While factual, the phrasing 'agitar ultra' suggests a biased perspective, reducing objectivity.