Editor's Choice: Intervention buys time, but won't fix yen's fundamental problem
Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent coordinated a yen-buying intervention for the first time in 28 years, as the yen fell to historic lows against the dollar, reaching 164 yen to the dollar. This intervention, reminiscent of past crises like the Asian financial crisis and post-2011 Tohoku earthquake, aims to prevent excessive yen depreciation and mitigate risks for Asian currencies like the South Korean won. While the move signals continued U.S.-Japan cooperation, analysts argue it does not address the yen's fundamental weaknesses. Japan's expansionary fiscal policies and the Bank of Japan's perceived lag in interest rate hikes are seen as key underlying issues. Persistent demand for dollars due to high global energy prices also pressures the yen. Despite the intervention, the yen weakened again to 158 yen to the dollar, with Toyota adjusting its expected exchange rate for the fiscal year ending March 2027.
The U.S. dollar fell sharply against the Japanese yen following coordinated market interventions by the United States and Japan. On Monday, the dollar traded at 156.34 yen, down about 1% from previous levels, marking a notable reversal from its peak of 163 yen, which had reached a 40-year high before late last week. The intervention was confirmed by both U.S. President Donald Trump and Japan’s finance minister, who stated that their respective governments had worked together to stabilize the yen. The yen had been experiencing prolonged weakness against the dollar, which raised concerns in Tokyo due to the country's heavy reliance on imported goods. A weaker yen increases import costs, contributing to higher inflation. Earlier efforts to strengthen the yen had failed to make a significant impact on the exchange rate. However, recent developments suggested that both nations had taken decisive steps to counter the yen’s decline. President Trump acknowledged the U.S. involvement in supporting the yen, describing it as a "signal of friendship" that would provide financial benefits to the United States and promote global economic stability. He emphasized the strong financial relationship between the U.S. and Japan, noting that Japan had sought assistance with its weakening currency. Trump also referenced historical ties, mentioning Japan's past actions, including the attack on Pearl Harbor, while highlighting current cooperation. Japan’s Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama confirmed the intervention, stating that the finance ministry had purchased yen in coordination with the U.S. Treasury Department. She noted that the move aimed to counter excessive volatility and disorderly movements in the Japanese yen over recent months. The ministry indicated it would not hesitate to take further action if needed. The intervention marked a rare instance of explicit acknowledgment of market manipulation by major economies. Analysts pointed out that such coordinated efforts had previously occurred, notably after the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Neil Newman, managing director and head of strategy at Astris Advisory Japan, highlighted the significance of the move, suggesting that the U.S. and Japan share aligned interests in stabilizing the yen. The U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent supported the intervention, emphasizing the importance of maintaining economic security and the strength of the U.S.-Japan alliance. His comments underscored the strategic considerations behind the move, which included addressing potential pressures on Japan’s trade policies and interest rates. Japanese authorities had already engaged in substantial forex interventions prior to the coordinated effort with the U.S. Data revealed that Japan spent a record 6.28 trillion yen on April 30 alone to support the yen, with additional operations taking place in May. These interventions significantly impacted the exchange rate, pushing the dollar down to the 155 yen range from the upper 160 yen zone. Despite these efforts, the dollar later recovered, reaching 163.99 yen, its highest level in approximately 40 years. The coordinated intervention on July 30 and 31 represented the first such collaboration between the U.S. and Japan in 15 years. Analysts estimated that Japan’s total intervention over the two-day period amounted to around 11 trillion yen to 12 trillion yen. The yen continues to face selling pressure amid concerns about Japan’s fiscal health, particularly as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi implements aggressive fiscal spending measures. Japanese carmakers anticipate the yen will remain near the post-intervention levels, viewing the recent actions as a means to prevent extreme fluctuations rather than indicating a fundamental shift in the currency’s trajectory. The ongoing situation highlights the complex interplay between economic strategies and geopolitical dynamics, with the U.S. and Japan navigating shared challenges through coordinated financial interventions.
Japan and the United States conducted a coordinated foreign exchange intervention to support the yen on Friday, according to government sources. This marks the first such joint action since 2011. The move indicates alignment between Tokyo and Washington on addressing yen weakness, which has been a concern for both economies. The intervention involved efforts to stabilize the currency through collaborative measures, reflecting shared economic priorities. The event highlights the ongoing importance of bilateral cooperation in managing global financial markets.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a coordinated economic action between Japan and the U.S., focusing on foreign exchange management. It presents factual information without apparent ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. The content is neutral in tone and focuses on the economic decision,
Why factuality (95): This article confirms the joint intervention between Japan and the U.S. as the first since 2011, providing specific dates and roles of officials. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and includes direct quotes from government sources, ensuring accuracy.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and factual tone, presenting the intervention without emotional language or bias. It focuses on the event and its significance without injecting personal views.
The Japan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9029 days ago
Japanese financial authorities are believed to have intervened to stabilize the yen after it unexpectedly surged against the dollar on Thursday night. Analysts suggest this intervention may have involved coordination with the United States to prevent excessive volatility in currency markets.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an objective assessment of potential central bank intervention without overtly favoring any particular political stance or ideology. It focuses on economic actions rather than ideological positions, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (95): This article clearly states that Japan and the U.S. conducted a joint intervention for the first time since 2011, supported by government sources and media reports. It is highly factual and aligned with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the facts objectively, without emotional language or clear bias, maintaining a balanced tone throughout.
Japan TodayIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8026 days ago
President Donald Trump stated that the United States had intervened jointly with Japan to support the yen, describing the action as a 'signal of friendship' that benefits both nations and the global economy. The intervention, reported by the Financial Times, marks the first such collaboration between the U.S. and Japan in nearly three decades. Trump emphasized the strong U.S.-Japan relationship and noted that Japan sought assistance due to a weakening yen. According to reports, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York sold euros to buy yen on behalf of the U.S. Treasury, while Japan's Finance Minister confirmed the coordinated purchase of yen to counter excessive volatility. Analysts estimate Japan's intervention amounted to around 6–8.45 trillion yen. Both U.S. and Japanese officials indicated they may take further joint action to stabilize the yen.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the U.S.-Japan joint intervention in the yen market, quoting both President Trump and Japanese officials. It includes direct quotes from Trump and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the U
Why factuality (95): The article confirms the U.S. intervention with direct quotes from Trump and mentions the Financial Times report, aligning with the cross-source consensus on the intervention's timing and purpose.
Why objectivity (80): The emphasis on Trump's 'signal of friendship' may subtly favor the U.S. perspective, though the overall tone remains factual.
The Japanese government intervened in foreign exchange markets by buying yen and selling dollars on Thursday, aiming to stabilize the yen's value against the dollar. This action coincided with U.S. authorities conducting a rate check, which is typically viewed as a potential precursor to monetary intervention. Market observers suggest that both nations may have coordinated efforts to prevent the yen from depreciating further against the dollar, bringing the yen-dollar exchange rate into the 157 range at one point.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the joint actions between Japan and the U.S., focusing on market interventions and rate checks without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the coordination between central banks without taking a clear ideological stance, thus leaning toward center.
Why factuality (90): Provides detailed figures on past interventions, including the record amount spent on April 30 and estimates for July 30. These figures are corroborated by official statements and cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article presents factual data objectively, detailing past interventions and their impacts. It avoids subjective commentary and sticks to reported events and figures.
The U.S. and Japan coordinated a yen intervention where the U.S. lent dollars using Treasury bonds as collateral to stabilize the currency. This approach was chosen to avoid triggering a potential sell-off of U.S. Treasury securities by Japanese authorities. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama discussed this strategy, which was framed as a pragmatic measure rather than a symbolic gesture of 'friendship' as highlighted by President Donald Trump.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the yen intervention as a pragmatic economic decision, focusing on financial mechanisms and risk management. While it mentions President Trump's characterization of the action as a 'signal of friendship,' it does not frame the intervention through ideological or partisan lenses.
Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details about the intervention mechanism (repo facility) and quotes officials like Scott Bessent and Satsuki Katayama. It accurately describes the method used and includes context about the purpose of the intervention.
Why objectivity (85): The mention of Trump calling the intervention a 'signal of friendship' adds a slightly more diplomatic tone, but overall the reporting remains objective and focused on facts.
The recent coordinated intervention by Japan and the U.S. central banks to support the yen has shown limited success in reversing its decline. Market analysts point to growing skepticism toward Japan's economic policies as a key factor behind the yen's continued weakness. The intervention, which involved coordinated efforts between the two nations, failed to significantly alter the currency's downward trend. This reflects broader concerns about the effectiveness of Japan's fiscal and monetary strategies in stabilizing the economy.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation, highlighting both the actions taken by Japan and the U.S. and the resulting market skepticism. It does not overtly favor one side or another but focuses on the outcomes and underlying factors affecting the yen. There is no strong ideological sl抗
Why factuality (85): The article discusses the BOJ board's split over JGB purchases and cites the minutes of the June meeting. It accurately represents the debate among board members and the stated rationale for continuing purchases.
Why objectivity (85): The reporting is balanced, presenting different viewpoints within the BOJ without taking a clear stance on which perspective is correct.
The Japan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8526 days ago
Japan has confirmed a joint yen intervention with the United States, marking the first such action since 2011. This move follows the 2011 earthquake in eastern Japan, during which both nations coordinated efforts to weaken the yen. The intervention suggests a willingness by Japan and the U.S. to take further measures to manage currency fluctuations, likely aimed at supporting economic stability and trade relations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update on a joint economic policy decision between Japan and the U.S. without overtly favoring either side. It provides historical context but does not emphasize ideological positions or frame the intervention through a particular political lens. The tone remains neutr
Why factuality (85): The article confirms the joint intervention and notes it as the first since 2011. This aligns with historical records and other reports. It provides context about the timing and significance of the action.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral, presenting the information without overt bias. It focuses on the event itself rather than taking a stance on its implications.
The Japan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8527 days ago
Japan's Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama is anticipated to highlight collaborative efforts between Japan and the United States to address concerns over the yen's significant depreciation. The joint action underscores the two nations' shared interest in stabilizing currency values, which they believe could negatively impact economic stability and trade relations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about coordinated actions between Japan and the U.S. regarding the yen's decline without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the stated goals of both governments without emphasizing ideological differences or taking a clear stance on the effectiveness of the措
Why factuality (85): The article states Japan will announce joint action with the U.S., which is consistent with other reports. It does not add new details but aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The language is neutral, focusing on the expected announcement without taking sides on the implications of the intervention.
The Japanese yen surged to a high of 157 against the US dollar on July 30, 2026, marking its strongest level since mid-May. This sharp increase followed a period of depreciation driven by concerns over Japan's fiscal policy and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Some market analysts speculate that this movement could indicate potential central bank intervention to stabilize the currency. The yen's rise has sparked discussions among financial experts about whether authorities might step in to curb excessive volatility.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the yen's fluctuation as a market-driven event, citing economic factors such as fiscal policy concerns and geopolitical risks. It does not take a clear ideological stance on the cause or implications of the yen's rise, nor does it emphasize any particular political agenda. The报道
Why factuality (85): States that the yen surged to the 157 range, possibly due to intervention. This aligns with other reports on the yen's movement and the possibility of intervention. Cross-source consensus supports the correlation between the yen's strength and intervention.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the yen's movement as a potential indicator of intervention without taking a definitive stance. Language remains neutral and factual.
The U.S. Treasury Department has informed currency market participants that further interventions could occur after Japan's recent actions to support the yen. On Thursday, Japanese authorities intervened in foreign exchange markets by buying yen and selling dollars, leading to the yen reaching its highest level since mid-May. This development comes amid ongoing concerns over currency fluctuations and their impact on global financial markets. The move highlights the close coordination between major economic powers in managing currency stability.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a coordinated international monetary policy decision involving the U.S. Treasury and Japanese authorities. It presents factual information without overtly favoring any side, focusing on the actions taken and their immediate effects on the yen's value. There is no evident bias,
Why factuality (85): Article reports that the U.S. Treasury told banks to prepare for potential yen intervention following Japan's action, and mentions the yen surged. This aligns with multiple sources indicating coordinated intervention and yen strengthening. No primary source is available, but cross-source consensus s
Why objectivity (80): The article presents information neutrally, reporting actions taken by both Japan and the U.S. without overt bias. However, it uses phrases like 'potential operation' which might imply uncertainty, though this is standard in financial reporting.
Japan and the United States conducted a coordinated foreign exchange intervention to support the yen on Friday, according to Japan's Finance Ministry, which confirmed the action on Monday. This marks the first such joint intervention since 2011. The move was reportedly prompted by concerns over the yen's weakness against the dollar, with Japanese officials seeking some level of assistance from the U.S. during discussions. The intervention involved both governments working together to stabilize the currency market.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the event as a factual update without overtly favoring either Japan or the U.S. It focuses on the confirmation of the intervention and its historical significance, without emphasizing ideological or partisan perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the economic and
Why factuality (85): Reports that Japan and the U.S. conducted a coordinated intervention, supported by official confirmation from Japan's Finance Ministry. This aligns with other articles on the same topic. Cross-source consensus confirms the timing and nature of the intervention.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts without clear bias, focusing on the outcome of the intervention and its impact on the yen. Language remains neutral and factual.
The yen rose to around 155 against the dollar after Japan and the United States coordinated currency intervention efforts. Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama confirmed that Japan had purchased the yen in coordination with the U.S. Department of the Treasury. This move comes amid ongoing concerns among traders about potential further interventions. The yen's strengthening was accompanied by rising Japanese government bond (JGB) yields and falling stock prices, indicating market uncertainty. Traders remain cautious about future actions by both countries regarding currency management.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a joint economic action between two nations involving currency intervention, which is inherently a political decision. However, the tone remains neutral, presenting the event factually without apparent ideological framing or biased language. It does not favor one side over the
Why factuality (85): States that the yen strengthened to the lower 155 range and that Japan and the U.S. are expected to intervene again. This is consistent with other reports on the coordinated intervention and its effects. Cross-source consensus supports these claims.
Why objectivity (80): The article provides a balanced view of the situation, noting both the immediate effect of the intervention and the ongoing concerns among traders. Tone remains neutral.
Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent coordinated a yen-buying intervention for the first time in 28 years, as the yen fell to historic lows against the dollar, reaching 164 yen to the dollar. This intervention, reminiscent of past crises like the Asian financial crisis and post-2011 Tohoku earthquake, aims to prevent excessive yen depreciation and mitigate risks for Asian currencies like the South Korean won. While the move signals continued U.S.-Japan cooperation, analysts argue it does not address the yen's fundamental weaknesses. Japan's expansionary fiscal policies and the Bank of Japan's perceived lag in interest rate hikes are seen as key underlying issues. Persistent demand for dollars due to high global energy prices also pressures the yen. Despite the intervention, the yen weakened again to 158 yen to the dollar, with Toyota adjusting its expected exchange rate for the fiscal year ending March 2027.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the yen's challenges, citing both the intervention efforts and the structural issues within Japan's economic policies. It attributes the yen's weakness to multiple factors including fiscal policy, central bank actions, and global market dynamics without overt褒
Why factuality (85): Reports the coordinated intervention as the first in 28 years, citing historical context and quotes from officials. This matches other accounts of the event and is supported by cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, providing historical background and quoting officials without apparent bias. It focuses on the significance of the event without taking sides.
Japan TodayIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8022 days ago
Japanese authorities conducted significant foreign exchange interventions in April and July 2024 to stabilize the yen against the US dollar. On April 30, they spent a record 6.28 trillion yen ($40 billion) in a single day, surpassing previous records. Additional interventions occurred on May 4 and May 6, totaling 5.46 trillion yen, and another major operation took place on July 30, with estimates ranging from 6 to 7 trillion yen. These actions were aimed at preventing the yen from depreciating further, which had reached a 40-year high against the dollar. In late July, Japan coordinated with U.S. authorities for the first time in 15 years to support the yen. Concerns about Japan’s fiscal sustainability persist due to increased government spending under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data regarding Japan's foreign exchange interventions without overtly favoring any political perspective. It includes context about the yen's value, the scale of interventions, and mentions concerns about fiscal health but does not take a clear ideological stand
Why factuality (85): Reports that U.S. support for the yen increases expectations for a September rate rise in Japan. This aligns with other articles discussing the implications of the intervention on monetary policy. Cross-source consensus supports the link between intervention and policy changes.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the implications of the intervention without overt bias, focusing on market reactions and policy expectations. Tone remains neutral.
Japan TodayIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8028 days ago
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed anticipation to meet Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda at the end of August during a G20 meeting in Asheville, North Carolina. In an X post, Bessent referred to Ueda as his 'longtime friend' and praised Japan's economic performance under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and the BOJ's commitment to monetary stability. Earlier, Bessent noted the Japanese yen's recent surge against the U.S. dollar, attributing the rapid increase to a large-scale currency intervention by Japanese authorities. The yen reached its strongest level in over three decades before the intervention, which followed a period where it had been at its weakest in over 39 years. Bessent highlighted the strong bilateral relationship between the U.S. and Japan but did not specify the reasons for his eagerness to meet Ueda.
Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced reporting on Bessent's remarks and the yen's fluctuation, citing both U.S. and Japanese perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from Bessent and mentions market reactions, but does not exhibit clear ideological leaning in its framing or sl抗
Why factuality (85): The article confirms the yen's spike and the subsequent intervention by Japanese authorities, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It cites market sources and provides context about the yen's historical weakness. The information is consistent with other reports.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts clearly and without significant bias. It reports on the intervention and its effects without injecting personal views or emotional language.
Japan's Bank of Japan preliminary data indicates that approximately $31.8 billion was spent to buy yen during a currency intervention on Friday, as part of a coordinated effort with U.S. authorities who also traded euros for yen. The yen surged against the dollar, reaching the 158 range from around 160 earlier in the day. This intervention followed previous actions by both central banks to stabilize exchange rates and manage market pressures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a monetary intervention by the Bank of Japan and U.S. authorities without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on economic activity and does not take a stance on policy preferences or political outcomes, maintaining a balanced frame.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on preliminary money market data from the Bank of Japan suggesting Japan spent $31.8 billion buying yen during a two-country intervention with the U.S. This aligns with the cross-source consensus of coordinated currency interventions between Japan and the U.S., though the exact f
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts neutrally, citing the Bank of Japan's data and the involvement of both countries. However, it slightly emphasizes the scale of the intervention without providing contrasting viewpoints or additional context.
The Japan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7525 days ago
The article discusses the potential implications of the U.S. supporting Japan in stabilizing the yen, which has fallen to nearly four-decade lows against the dollar. Analysts highlight various U.S. interests involved, including economic pressures related to trade and interest rates. The focus is on how U.S. intervention could influence Japan's monetary policies and broader economic relationships.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view by discussing the U.S. interests without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the economic implications rather than taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the interplay between U.S. and Japanese economic policies.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes U.S. interests in supporting the yen, citing analysts' views and referencing the broader context of trade and rates. It aligns with the cross-source consensus on U.S. motivations.
Why objectivity (75): The language leans toward highlighting U.S. interests, which may give a slight tilt toward American perspectives, though not overly biased.
Preliminary data from the Bank of Japan indicates that between 6 trillion to 7 trillion yen ($37.5 billion to $44 billion) was spent on yen-buying interventions on Thursday. This action contributed to the yen's 3% appreciation against the US dollar during early New York trading. The intervention comes after a previous round of yen purchases totaling $73 billion in April and May, highlighting ongoing efforts by the central bank to manage exchange rates.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data regarding the Bank of Japan's intervention in the foreign exchange market without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on monetary policy actions and their impact on currency values, which are typically considered non-partisan. While the yen-
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the preliminary estimates of yen-buying intervention and provides context about the yen's movement. It aligns with other sources regarding these points.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without apparent bias. It avoids using emotionally charged language and presents the events objectively without suggesting a particular viewpoint.
Japan TodayIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8528 days ago
The Japanese yen briefly rose to 157.24 against the U.S. dollar on Friday, reaching its strongest level since mid-May, according to reports. Japanese government sources confirmed that authorities intervened by buying yen and selling dollars to stabilize the currency. This follows a previous surge in the yen, which gained nearly 5 yen from nearly four-decade lows. The U.S. Treasury also participated in the intervention, with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York selling euros to purchase yen, marking the first joint effort between Tokyo and Washington to support the yen in over 30 years. Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama did not confirm the intervention but emphasized vigilance. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent previously noted that the yen appeared undervalued.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the yen's movement and the interventions by both Japanese and U.S. authorities. It includes quotes from Japanese officials and mentions U.S. Treasury actions without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on factual developments
Why factuality (80): The article reports on analysts' belief in Japan's intervention with possible U.S. assistance, which is consistent with other accounts. It lacks direct confirmation but aligns with the broader narrative.
Why objectivity (85): The language is neutral, presenting analysts' views without injecting personal opinion or bias.
The U.S. Treasury Department has informed financial institutions to prepare for potential further intervention in currency markets following Japan's recent action to support the yen by purchasing it and selling dollars. This follows Japan's decision to intervene in the foreign-exchange markets on Thursday, which aimed to stabilize the yen against the dollar. The move by Japanese authorities reflects ongoing efforts to manage exchange rates, potentially influenced by broader economic considerations. The U.S. warning suggests that further coordinated actions between central banks could be considered if market conditions warrant.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about potential U.S. Treasury intervention in currency markets based on Japan's recent actions. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports on the possibility of further intervention, suggesting a balanced approach to the situation without overtly favorit
Why factuality (80): The article reports that the U.S. Treasury has instructed banks to prepare for further intervention, based on information from Nikkei. It aligns with other reports on the topic and presents the situation as ongoing.
Why objectivity (80): The language is neutral, presenting the information as a current development without expressing personal opinion or bias.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Japan
