ON
← Back to feed
ED searches 14 premises across seven states, UTs in NHAI toll fraud case
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

ED searches 14 premises across seven states, UTs in NHAI toll fraud case

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted searches at 14 locations across seven Indian states and union territories as part of a money-laundering investigation into alleged fraudulent toll collection by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The probe alleges that unauthorized software was used at toll plazas to generate fake toll receipts, allowing toll payments to bypass the official accounting system. Forensic analysis of digital systems and NHAI records confirmed these allegations, prompting the ED to expand its investigation to trace the broader network involved in diverting toll revenues. The searches aim to gather digital and documentary evidence to determine how the manipulation occurred, who was responsible, and where the misappropriated funds went. The ED has not disclosed specific names, entities, or the amount of toll revenue allegedly diverted.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted searches at 14 locations across seven states and one Union Territory on Wednesday as part of an investigation into alleged fraudulent toll collection at National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) toll plazas. The operations took place in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, the National Capital Region and West Bengal. The probe focuses on money laundering related to the alleged misuse of unauthorised software applications at toll plazas to generate receipts outside the official system, enabling toll collections to be diverted without appearing in the formal accounting process. The investigation began with a case registered in January 2025, and the ED’s Ahmedabad Sub-Zonal Office submitted an Enforcement Case Information Report in May 2025. Forensic analysis of digital systems, combined with data from NHAI, confirmed the use of such software. This led the ED to expand its inquiry to trace the wider network involved in the alleged misappropriation of toll revenues. Searches aimed to secure digital and documentary evidence to determine how the manipulation occurred, who operated the unauthorised applications, and where the diverted funds went. Officials noted the focus on electronic devices, financial records, transaction details, and software-related materials to track the money trail and identify those implicated. The ED has not released the names of individuals or entities under scrutiny, nor the amount of toll revenue reportedly diverted.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 909/2/2026
ED searches 14 premises across seven states, UTs in NHAI toll fraud case

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted searches at 14 locations across seven Indian states and union territories as part of a money-laundering investigation into alleged fraudulent toll collection by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The probe alleges that unauthorized software was used at toll plazas to generate fake toll receipts, allowing toll payments to bypass the official accounting system. Forensic analysis of digital systems and NHAI records confirmed these allegations, prompting the ED to expand its investigation to trace the broader network involved in diverting toll revenues. The searches aim to gather digital and documentary evidence to determine how the manipulation occurred, who was responsible, and where the misappropriated funds went. The ED has not disclosed specific names, entities, or the amount of toll revenue allegedly diverted.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a legal investigation led by the Enforcement Directorate, focusing on procedural actions and findings without overtly criticizing or praising any political entity or ideology. It reports on the methodology and scope of the investigation without taking a

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the ED's actions, including the number of locations searched, the legal basis (PMLA Section 17), and references to the timeline of the case (registered in January 2025, with an ECI report in May 2025). It cites sources like officials and mentions foren

Why objectivity (90): The article presents facts in a neutral tone, focusing on the ED's procedural actions and findings without expressing personal opinion or bias. It uses formal language and avoids emotionally charged terms.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 859/2/2026
ED raids multiple states in fraud NHAI toll plaza collection case

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has conducted raids across multiple states as part of an investigation into alleged fraudulent activities related to toll plaza collections by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The operation targets individuals suspected of misappropriating funds collected at toll plazas, which are managed by NHAI. Authorities allege that these financial irregularities have led to significant revenue losses for the organization. The raids are part of broader efforts to combat corruption within infrastructure management sectors. No specific details about the scale of the alleged fraud or the number of individuals involved have been disclosed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the ED's actions against alleged fraud involving NHAI, a government agency. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on particular political groups. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the legal and administrative aspects of the investigation

Why factuality (80): The article confirms the ED's multi-state raids related to the NHAI toll fraud case but lacks specific details such as the number of locations searched or the legal framework used. It aligns with the general consensus from other reports but is less comprehensive than the first article.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, reporting the raid without apparent bias. However, it is more concise and less detailed compared to the first article, which may slightly affect perceived objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories