Ecostani: Slow trial, no paper leak convictions hurt govt’s reform record The resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan as the Union education minister marked the end of nationwide protests led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) over systemic failures in examination governance. However, the issue of examination paper leaks persists, undermining efforts to improve transparency and accountability in academic assessments. Over 150 such incidents have occurred in the past decade, affecting nearly seven million students, according to information gathered by journalists from across the country. Despite the introduction of strict state-level laws, many of which include prison terms of up to ten years and fines of up to ₹10 crore, the problem continues to plague the system. In several states, particularly those in the Hindi-speaking region, stringent measures have been enacted since 2021 to combat examination fraud. These laws have led to the lodging of numerous cases related to paper leaks and other malpractices, including impersonation. Hundreds of individuals have been named in First Information Reports (FIRs). Yet, despite these legal actions, the pace of investigations and trials has remained sluggish, allowing many suspects to remain free and continue engaging in illegal activities. In some cases, trials have yet to begin, while others have concluded without resulting in convictions due to inadequate or flawed investigations. One notable example is the case of Sanjiv Kumar Singh, known as Sanjiv Mukhiya, a 52-year-old resident of Bihar accused of running a national examination crime network. According to police, Mukhiya was linked to the 2024 NEET-UG paper leak. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) recently cleared him in this case, citing lack of direct evidence connecting him to the leak. However, the Bihar Police's Economic Offences Unit (EOU), which initially charged him on May 2, 2024, claims to possess technical evidence indicating his presence in Lavana, Gujarat, during the alleged leakage of the paper from a printing press. A charge sheet has been filed against him in this case, but the Bihar police described the CBI's findings as a setback to the ongoing inquiry. Mukhiya faces at least five pending charges, including one related to the 2017 NEET-UG paper leak. All these cases are currently in the trial phase, according to police officials. A senior officer noted that over 140 hearings have taken place, yet the cases remain unresolved. He expressed hope that the fast-track special courts recently announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi might expedite the resolution of such cases. Government data reveals that approximately 862 fast-track courts (FTCs) and 775 fast-track special courts (FSTCs) operate across states and union territories. On average, each FSTC resolves about nine-and-a-half cases monthly, significantly faster than the typical rate of regular criminal courts. However, the majority of these courts are dedicated to handling cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act (POCSO), where the backlog of pending cases continues to grow. As of July 24, 2026, around 245,000 cases were pending with FSTCs, compared to 202,000 in 2024. The situation appears even more dire for FTCs. Special courts established specifically for the 2026 NEET-UG paper leak in Maharashtra, where the leak originated, may lead to quicker resolutions. Nevertheless, thousands of other examination-related malpractice cases remain pending in local courts throughout the country. Recent instances include the leaking of two subject papers from the Uttarakhand Technical University and the unauthorized release of the entrance exam paper for Sainik (Army) Schools from Rajasthan. While some institutions have acknowledged these breaches, they often deny them publicly.
2 reports
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday Ecostani: Slow trial, no paper leak convictions hurt govt’s reform recordThe resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan as India's Union education minister marked the end of nationwide protests led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) against examination governance issues. However, concerns remain over the persistent issue of exam paper leaks, with over 150 such incidents reported in the past decade affecting millions of students. Despite stringent new laws introduced by several Hindi-speaking states and recent federal legislation, investigations into paper leaks have been slow, resulting in few convictions. A notable case involves Sanjiv Kumar Singh, accused of running a national examination crime network, who was cleared by the CBI in the 2024 NEET-UG paper leak case despite claims of technical evidence by Bihar police. Five cases against Singh remain unresolved, highlighting systemic challenges in the judicial process. The government has proposed fast-track courts to expedite trials, though current case clearance rates suggest limited progress.
Bias read (Center): While the article highlights criticism of the government's handling of exam paper leaks and mentions specific political figures like Dharmendra Pradhan and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it presents both state-level actions and federal responses without overtly favoring any particular political side.
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan, the involvement of the CJP, and mentions of 150 paper leak incidents affecting 7 million students. These figures appear consistent with general reporting on the issue. However, some specifics like the name 'Sanjiv K
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the situation with a critical tone toward the government's handling of the issue, particularly highlighting the lack of convictions and slow trials. While it does not explicitly take sides, the emphasis on government failure may introduce a subtle bias.
Hindustan TimesIndependentConservative5 hr. ago 'First of kind' vs 'showpiece amendment': Fiery paper leak bill debate in ParliamentParliament resumed debates on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, aimed at imposing stricter penalties and expedited trials for exam paper leaks. The ruling party's representative, Union minister Jitendra Singh, praised the bill as a landmark effort to protect student welfare and enhance exam integrity, calling it a 'first of its kind' in independent India's history. He emphasized the government's commitment to ensuring 'speedy justice' through fast-track courts and special task forces. Opposition members criticized the government's handling of past incidents involving exam fraud and questioned the effectiveness of such measures. The bill proposes minimum five-year prison terms, two-month investigative limits, and dedicated courts for handling such cases.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the bill as a significant achievement of the ruling government, emphasizing its 'first of its kind' status and linking it to Prime Minister Modi's leadership. The narrative highlights the government's proactive stance on student welfare and exam integrity, using strong positive ad
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter