ON
← Back to feed
Economist said formal wages lost 17% and explained why "the changueros" are growing
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Economist said formal wages lost 17% and explained why "the changueros" are growing

Economista Martín Rapetti afirmó que cerca de 14 millones de argentinos con ingresos registrados han perdido entre un 16 y 17% de su poder adquisitivo durante el mandato de Javier Milei. Basándose en datos del SIPA, destacó una caída sistemática en el poder de compra desde principios del año anterior, con una recuperación parcial en 2024 y una nueva caída a partir de mediados de 2025. Rapetti señaló que el 'ingreso disponible' sigue cayendo fuertemente, aunque el desempleo no ha aumentado significativamente. Además, mencionó que el empleo informal, conocido como 'changueros', ha crecido considerablemente, con aproximadamente 500.000 personas adicionales, lo cual compense parcialmente la pérdida de empleo formal. Advirtió sobre la necesidad de precaución al interpretar los datos oficiales debido a posibles distorsiones en las estadísticas.

Economist Martin Rapetti stated that formal wages have lost 17% in purchasing power since the start of President Javier Milei’s government, while informal employment, referred to as “changueros”, has grown significantly. According to Rapetti, nearly 14 million individuals earning registered incomes have experienced a decline of between 16 and 17% in their buying power over the past year. This assessment was shared during an interview with Radio Rivadavia, which was later broadcast by NA. Rapetti based his analysis on data from the Argentine Integrated Social Security System (SIPA), which includes records of approximately six million private sector workers, three million public employees, and five million retirees and pensioners. He emphasized that the drop in purchasing power has been consistent since early last year, with a noticeable acceleration in recent months. The economist noted that the impact of this decline is not just its scale, but also its intensity, particularly in the initial phase of Milei’s administration. The situation became more complex after a brief recovery in 2024, followed by stagnation at the beginning of 2025. From mid-2025 onwards, the trend resumed its downward trajectory. Rapetti highlighted that the most concerning aspect is the decline in “disposable income,” which refers to the amount left after all fixed expenses have been paid. While he acknowledged that unemployment has not risen sharply, he pointed out that formal private-sector jobs have decreased by around 240,000 positions. In response to these economic challenges, the Association of Private Insurance Companies (APICC) warned that family debt levels are hindering sales in the province of Corrientes. This suggests that financial strain among households is becoming increasingly pronounced, further complicating efforts to stabilize the economy. Rapetti explained that the decline in formal wages has been partially offset by the growth of informal employment. He described this shift as a rise in independent work, including self-employed individuals and those who operate without contributing to social security systems. These workers, whom he referred to as “changueros,” include people engaged in casual labor or those who manage to make ends meet through other means. Rapetti estimated that this group has expanded by roughly 500,000 people. He cautioned that caution must be exercised when interpreting official salary statistics, as they often include increases in informal income that may not accurately reflect reality. Additionally, he pointed out that the National Institute of Statistics (INDEC) survey collects direct responses about income, which could lead to overestimations due to the reduced inflation rate. The growing reliance on informal employment reflects broader economic pressures, with many families struggling under rising debt burdens. As the situation continues to evolve, experts warn that the long-term implications of these trends remain uncertain, requiring careful monitoring and policy adjustments to address the underlying issues affecting Argentina's workforce and household finances.

1 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 78yesterday
Economist said formal wages lost 17% and explained why "the changueros" are growing

Economista Martín Rapetti afirmó que cerca de 14 millones de argentinos con ingresos registrados han perdido entre un 16 y 17% de su poder adquisitivo durante el mandato de Javier Milei. Basándose en datos del SIPA, destacó una caída sistemática en el poder de compra desde principios del año anterior, con una recuperación parcial en 2024 y una nueva caída a partir de mediados de 2025. Rapetti señaló que el 'ingreso disponible' sigue cayendo fuertemente, aunque el desempleo no ha aumentado significativamente. Además, mencionó que el empleo informal, conocido como 'changueros', ha crecido considerablemente, con aproximadamente 500.000 personas adicionales, lo cual compense parcialmente la pérdida de empleo formal. Advirtió sobre la necesidad de precaución al interpretar los datos oficiales debido a posibles distorsiones en las estadísticas.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo presenta una crítica al gobierno de Javier Milei, destacando la caída en el poder adquisitivo y el aumento del desempleo formal, mientras resalta el crecimiento del empleo informal ('changueros') como una consecuencia negativa. El lenguaje utilizado sugiere una preocupación por las polít

Why factuality (85): The article reports on an economist's estimate regarding wage loss under President Milei, citing data from SIPA as a source. It provides specific figures and trends over time, aligning with broader economic narratives about inflation and purchasing power decline. While there is no primary source doc

Why objectivity (78): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards presenting the economist's perspective as authoritative. The article uses terms like 'caída sistemática' and 'fuertemente' which carry emotional weight, suggesting a somewhat critical view of the government's economic policies.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories