Ecclestone's in trouble. He's been detained at the airport with a gun.
Bernie Ecclestone, dolgoletni šef Formule 1, je bil pridržan na portugalskem letališču zaradi neregistriranega orožja. Policisti so zahtevali, naj predloži ustrezne dokumentacije za puško, ki je bila namenjena streljanju na glinaste golobe. Ecclestone je objasnil, da je puško prinesel iz Švice, da bi lahko streljal na glinaste golobe v Portugalsku. Njegova žena je s carinskim uradnikom odšla v Lizbono, kjer je puško predala pristojnim oblastim. To je drugič, da je Ecclestone zaradi orožja doživel težave – pred štirimi leti je bil pridržan na brazilskem letališču zaradi neregistrirane puške.
Bernie Ecclestone, the former chief of Formula One, was detained at a regional airport in Lisbon after authorities discovered a shotguns in his possession during a routine check. The 95-year-old British businessman arrived in Portugal aboard his private aircraft and was questioned by police and customs officials following the discovery. According to reports, the incident occurred on Monday, September 7, 2026, at the Tires Aerodrome near Cascais, outside Lisbon. Ecclestone explained to reporters that he had brought the firearm from Switzerland, intending to participate in a clay pigeon shooting competition held in the area. He stated that he had previously transported the weapon from England to Switzerland and believed he had all necessary documentation for its importation. However, upon arrival, he was required to surrender the gun due to missing paperwork. Ecclestone described the process as “unnecessary hassle,” though he denied being formally arrested. This is not the first time Ecclestone has faced such issues. Four years earlier, in 2022, he was briefly detained in Brazil after a small handgun was found in his luggage during a flight to Switzerland. At that time, he claimed he was unaware the weapon was in his baggage and later paid a fine of approximately £1,000 to local authorities. He has consistently downplayed these incidents, referring to them as “small and completely insignificant.” During the current incident, Ecclestone’s wife, Fabiana Flosi, accompanied him to the airport and later joined him in Lisbon to hand over the firearm to the relevant authorities. She reportedly traveled with a customs officer to ensure the proper procedures were followed. Ecclestone confirmed that he had signed the necessary documents and that the situation had been resolved without further complications. Local media in Portugal initially reported the incident, citing police sources who stated that the firearm was discovered during a routine inspection. Ecclestone, however, clarified that he had passed through customs without issue and that the police had simply requested additional information about the weapon. He emphasized that the encounter was brief and did not result in formal arrest. In a separate account, a report from the BBC noted that Ecclestone was questioned by four officers and customs personnel for around an hour. He reiterated that he had no intention of violating any laws and that the presence of the firearm was purely for recreational purposes. The report also highlighted that the airport staff knew him well, which he hoped would prevent any unnecessary delays. Additional coverage from international outlets, including Spanish and Croatian media, echoed similar accounts. These reports detailed how Ecclestone had transported the weapon from England to Switzerland before bringing it to Portugal, and how the lack of proper documentation led to the temporary detention. Some sources mentioned that the firearm was a model known for use in shooting competitions, reinforcing the claim that it was intended for sport rather than illicit activity. Despite repeated encounters with law enforcement over firearm-related matters, Ecclestone has maintained that his actions were always lawful and that the incidents were minor inconveniences. His spokesperson has not issued a public statement, but his remarks to journalists suggest a continued focus on resolving the situation quickly and without further escalation. The incident underscores the challenges faced by high-profile individuals when traveling with restricted items, even when the intent is non-violent. As Ecclestone continues to navigate these logistical hurdles, the broader implications remain unclear, with no indication of further legal action or public scrutiny beyond the immediate circumstances.
Bernie Ecclestone, dolgoletni šef Formule 1, je bil pridržan na portugalskem letališču zaradi neregistriranega orožja. Policisti so zahtevali, naj predloži ustrezne dokumentacije za puško, ki je bila namenjena streljanju na glinaste golobe. Ecclestone je objasnil, da je puško prinesel iz Švice, da bi lahko streljal na glinaste golobe v Portugalsku. Njegova žena je s carinskim uradnikom odšla v Lizbono, kjer je puško predala pristojnim oblastim. To je drugič, da je Ecclestone zaradi orožja doživel težave – pred štirimi leti je bil pridržan na brazilskem letališču zaradi neregistrirane puške.
Bias read (Center): Čeprav gre za znano osebo in pomembno područje (orožje), artikel ne prikazuje nobene stranske pozicije ali politične agende. Poudarek je na dejstvih in objasnitvah Ecclestonea, brez dodatnih ocen ali kritike. Vsebina je neutralna in informativna, zato se uvrsti v sredino.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Bernie Ecclestone was detained at a Portuguese airport due to unregistered firearms. It includes direct quotes from Ecclestone explaining his possession of the gun for clay shooting. The article also references a similar incident four years prior in Brazil, aligni
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts and direct quotes from Ecclestone. While it uses some descriptive language like 'težavah' (troubles) and 'puške' (gun), these are standard journalistic terms. There is no clear bias or editorializing, though the phrasing suggests a sl
Nekdanji šef Formule 1 Bernie Ecclestone je bil ponovno aretiran na portugalskem letališču, ko so policiste našli puško šibrovko v njegovi prtljagi. To je drugačen primer njegovega preteklostega vedenja, kjer je pred štirimi leti v Braziliji bil aretiran zaradi podobne skene. Ecclestone je ob odkritju orožja razlagal svojo dejavnost kot 'želenje streljati na glinaste golobe', kar je poudarjal kot smehotvoren razlog. Njegov vedenje je bilo v nasprotju z zakoni o nošenju orožja, kar je povzročilo njegovo aretacijo.
Bias read (Center): Čeprav je tematika povezana z zakonodajo in varnostjo, je artikel neutralen v svojem okviru. Ne predstavlja nobene strani ali politične pozicije, ampak samo poroča o dogodku in Ecclestoneevih razlagah. Vsebina ne vključuje politične kritike ali podpore, zato se uvrsti v sredino.
Why factuality (80): This article correctly states that Ecclestone was detained in Portugal over an unregistered firearm and mentions the previous incident in Brazil. It provides Ecclestone’s explanation regarding the purpose of the gun. However, it omits specific dates for the most recent event and relies more on summa
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts neutrally but uses phrases such as 'aretirali' (detained) and 'hodil po letališču' (walking around the airport with a gun), which may imply a slight negative tone toward Ecclestone. The mention of his age ('zdaj že 95-letni') adds context but could subtly influence per
Bernie Ecclestone, nekdanji šef Formule 1, je bil aretiran na regionalnem letališču v Lizboni po poročanju otoških medijev, ko so lokalne oblasti pri njem našli puško. Incident se je zgodil, ko je pristal s svojim zasebnim letalom. Podoben dogodek je bil pred štirimi leti na brazilskem letališču, kjer je trdil, da ni vedel za puško v svoji prtljagi. Ecclestone je opisal situacijo kot 'majhen in popolnoma nepomemben incident', kar je hudo vznemirilo njegovo družino med izstopanjem iz Sao Paula. Še posebej je opozoril na to, da je puško kupil od neznanca.
Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja dejstvo, da je Bernie Ecclestone aretiran zaradi puške, kar je politično narekovanje, vendar pa ne izraža nobene stranske podpore ali kritike. Vsebina je neutralna in informativna, brez izrazitega stališča ali polemik. Poudarja dejstva in reakcije, ne pa tudi politične implikacij
Why factuality (75): The article reports an arrest of Bernie Ecclestone at Lisbon airport based on local media accounts. It mentions a routine operation where authorities found a gun, aligns with previous incidents in Brazil, and includes quotes from Ecclestone. While there is no primary source, the information appears
Why objectivity (60): The tone leans towards a somewhat sympathetic portrayal of Ecclestone, especially through his quote explaining the gun purchase. The article frames the situation as 'minor' but acknowledges the impact on his family, suggesting some editorial influence rather than purely factual reporting.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
