Ebola: FG plans state treatment centres as contacts hit 53
Nigeria’s Federal Government has initiated plans to establish and equip Ebola treatment centers in states with designated ports of entry after the number of identified contacts linked to the country’s single confirmed case rose to 53. Authorities are currently assessing the isolation capacity at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and preparing an infection prevention and control evaluation for Karu General Hospital to handle potential surges in patient numbers. The strategy includes creating referral mechanisms to transfer suspected cases from detection sites to specialized treatment facilities and enhancing surveillance at international entry points. To address economic concerns among those undergoing mandatory isolation, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention approved an emergency stipend of N100,000 per week for individuals in quarantine. This financial measure aims to cover basic living costs and encourage compliance with public health protocols. The national incident management system remains active under the coordination of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare.
Go to the primary sources (3)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has approved a weekly stipend of N100,000 for individuals placed in isolation or quarantine during the current Ebola outbreak in the Federal Capital Territory. NCDC Director-General Dr. Jide Idris announced the measure at a press briefing in Abuja, stating it was an emergency intervention designed to alleviate financial burdens related to feeding, accommodation, and family upkeep for those undergoing mandatory public health monitoring. The decision followed complaints from contacts regarding the costs associated with their confinement. While the funds are currently being provided by the federal authority for the FCT, Idris emphasized that state governments must independently prepare financial and logistical resources to handle similar emergencies in their respective jurisdictions. Health officials have identified 53 primary contacts, including healthcare workers and household members, linked to a single confirmed imported case detected in Abuja on October 20.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific public health administrative decision and budgetary allocation. It relies heavily on direct quotes from the NCDC Director-General to explain the rationale behind the stipend and the broader implications for state-level preparedness. There is no evidence of partisan,
Why factuality (100): Accurately reports the specific policy decision regarding the N100,000 stipend, citing the correct official (Dr. Jide Idris) and context (emergency measure for Ebola contacts in FCT). All details align with standard reporting on this specific Nigerian health announcement.
Why objectivity (100): Maintains a strictly neutral, journalistic tone. Presents the facts of the policy change and the rationale provided by the official without injecting opinion, judgment, or sensationalism.
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) announced the identification of 53 primary contacts associated with a confirmed Ebola case in the Federal Capital Territory. NCDC Director-General Jide Idris stated that these individuals include healthcare workers, the patient's family members, and sample collection teams, all of whom are currently under monitoring. As of the briefing, none of the tracked contacts have tested positive for the virus or exhibited symptoms. The agency also reported that a separate suspected case in Rivers State tested negative, confirming that only one active case remains in the country. Public health officials emphasized that contact tracing is ongoing and that identified individuals will be monitored for 21 days to align with the disease's incubation period. Additionally, the NCDC highlighted efforts to strengthen national laboratory capacities and ensure the availability of necessary testing reagents to manage potential future outbreaks.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency using standard journalistic practices. It relies exclusively on official statements from the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention regarding contact tracing and laboratory capabilities. There is no evidence of partisan framing, ideological
Why factuality (100): Correctly details the breakdown of the 53 identified contacts (healthcare workers, household members, etc.) and accurately conveys the status of testing (none positive yet). The information is precise and consistent with the official briefing described.
Why objectivity (100): Objective and informative. The article focuses on the data provided by the NCDC director-general, using neutral language to describe the contact tracing process and the categorization of individuals.
The PunchIndependentCenterFactual 100Objective 100
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has authorized an emergency weekly stipend of N100,000 for individuals placed under isolation or quarantine due to an Ebola outbreak in the Federal Capital Territory. NCDC Director-General Dr. Jide Idris announced the measure during a press briefing, stating it was implemented to address complaints regarding the costs of feeding and family maintenance while under public health monitoring. Although the agency covers accommodation and meals, the additional cash support aims to alleviate financial hardship for contacts, including healthcare workers and household members. Idris emphasized that this unplanned intervention is specific to the current emergency and urged other Nigerian states to prepare similar financial and logistical resources for potential future outbreaks. As of the briefing, Nigeria has reported one confirmed imported case in Abuja, with 53 primary contacts currently being monitored and categorized based on their level of exposure.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health crisis management decision involving government funding and inter-jurisdictional responsibilities. While the subject matter (Ebola containment and state obligations) is politically significant, the reporting relies exclusively on direct quotes from the NCDC DG.
Why factuality (100): Faithfully reproduces the core facts of the N100,000 stipend announcement, including the quotes from Dr. Jide Idris and the justification based on complaints from contacts. No inaccuracies or omissions of key context found.
Why objectivity (100): Neutral and balanced. The piece reports the administrative decision and the official's statements directly, avoiding any editorializing or value judgments regarding the adequacy of the amount or the necessity of the measure.
The Lagos State government announced heightened preparedness measures following the confirmation of an imported Ebola case in Nigeria's Federal Capital Territory. Health Commissioner Akin Abayomi stated that the state is on high alert due to Lagos serving as a major transit hub connected to Abuja. The administration reported that its Emergency Operations Centre has implemented protocols for surveillance, isolation, and rapid laboratory testing, including a target for results within 24 hours. Simulation exercises are currently underway for response teams, while airport screenings and digital health surveillance systems have been strengthened in coordination with federal authorities. Residents were advised to monitor for specific symptoms such as fever and unexplained bleeding, and instructed to contact emergency services rather than self-medicating if exposure is suspected.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency response involving government officials. While the subject involves state action, the content consists primarily of factual updates regarding medical protocols, infrastructure upgrades, and public safety advice. There is no significant ideological slt
Why factuality (100): Accurately summarizes the preparedness measures taken by the Lagos State government, including the upgrade of isolation centers and the establishment of a research committee. The attribution to Commissioner Akin Abayomi is correct.
Why objectivity (100): Balanced and professional. While the content is inherently promotional (a government statement on readiness), the article presents these claims neutrally as reported actions rather than endorsing them as effective or sufficient.
Kenya has recorded its second death from the Bundibugyo virus, a strain of Ebola, bringing the total fatalities in the country to two. The deceased was a 65-year-old woman who was a close contact of the initial patient, a traveler from the Democratic Republic of the Congo who passed away earlier in October. According to the Kenyan Ministry of Health, the woman developed symptoms while under quarantine and was treated in an isolation facility before dying. Seven other confirmed patients remain hospitalized, and authorities state that all cases are part of a single cluster with no evidence of community transmission. The World Health Organization notes that these cases are epidemiologically linked to the index case, highlighting the effectiveness of contact tracing. The outbreak has prompted regional concern regarding cross-border transmission, as Nigeria has also reported an imported case linked to travel through Uganda.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency using neutral, factual language derived directly from official statements. It does not take a stance on political policies, blame specific governments, or frame the event in terms of partisan interests. The focus remains strictly on the medical facts,
Why factuality (100): Correctly reports the second death in Kenya, the age of the victim, and the link to the initial DRC-imported case. Accurately cites the WHO timeline for the first death and the Kenyan Ministry of Health for the second, ensuring proper sourcing for both events.
Why objectivity (100): Dispassionate and respectful. The tone is somber but objective, focusing on the clinical and administrative aspects of the outbreak (quarantine, burial protocols) without sensationalizing the tragedy or speculating beyond the provided facts.
Nigeria’s federal government has identified 53 contacts associated with the country’s single confirmed Ebola case in the Federal Capital Territory, increasing the count from an earlier figure of 44. The administration approved an emergency stipend of N100,000 per week for individuals undergoing isolation or quarantine to cover basic living expenses. Dr. Jide Idris, Director-General of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, stated that the confirmed patient is improving and that no contacts have tested positive for the virus. While a suspected case in Rivers State tested negative, investigations continue regarding another suspected case in the FCT. Regional responses include enhanced surveillance at Lagos’ international airport and activation of monitoring protocols in Zamfara State after a passenger arrived with a high fever.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health crisis managed by the federal government, which falls under the politics category due to the involvement of state institutions and policy decisions. However, the tone remains strictly informational and neutral. It relies heavily on direct quotes from the heady,
Why factuality (95): Precisely reports the update on contact numbers (44 to 53) and the specific financial figure (N100,000). Accurately summarizes the DG's statements and the status of the Lagos response.
Why objectivity (95): Objective and straightforward. Focuses strictly on the administrative actions and figures released by the government.
Nigeria’s Federal Government has initiated plans to establish and equip Ebola treatment centers in states with designated ports of entry after the number of identified contacts linked to the country’s single confirmed case rose to 53. Authorities are currently assessing the isolation capacity at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and preparing an infection prevention and control evaluation for Karu General Hospital to handle potential surges in patient numbers. The strategy includes creating referral mechanisms to transfer suspected cases from detection sites to specialized treatment facilities and enhancing surveillance at international entry points. To address economic concerns among those undergoing mandatory isolation, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention approved an emergency stipend of N100,000 per week for individuals in quarantine. This financial measure aims to cover basic living costs and encourage compliance with public health protocols. The national incident management system remains active under the coordination of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health crisis response involving government agencies and specific policy actions like funding for quarantined citizens. While the subject involves state action, the tone is strictly informational and administrative. It cites official reports and statements without pej
Why factuality (95): Correctly details the strategic plan for treatment centers and the specific hospitals mentioned (University of Abuja, Karu General). Faithfully represents the contents of the situation report cited.
Why objectivity (95): Neutral reporting style. Conveys the government's logistical plans without injecting bias or judgment.
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has reinstated mandatory health declarations for all international travelers entering the country following the confirmation of an Ebola case in the Federal Capital Territory. NCDC Director-General Jide Idris announced the reversal of previous restrictions, which had limited declarations to arrivals from specific outbreak regions like the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda. The measure follows the identification of a 42-year-old Ugandan woman infected with the Bundibugyo strain of the virus, who arrived in Nigeria on October 3. Authorities have identified 53 primary contacts, including healthcare workers and household members, and are monitoring them for the 21-day incubation period. Coordination efforts involve the Federal Airports Authority, the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority, and port health services across five major international airports to enhance screening protocols.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency response involving government agencies. While it involves state actors (NCDC, FAA, NCAA), the content focuses strictly on procedural measures, epidemiological data, and logistical coordination rather than partisan politics, policy debates, or election
Why factuality (95): Accurately describes the policy reversal regarding health declarations and lists the correct airports and agencies involved. Direct quotes are attributed correctly.
Why objectivity (95): Balanced and professional. Reports the procedural changes and operational challenges without taking a stance on the effectiveness of the measures.
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has directed all public and private healthcare facilities across the country to immediately isolate suspected Ebola cases and enhance infection prevention protocols prior to receiving laboratory confirmation. This directive follows the recent confirmation of Nigeria’s first Ebola case in over a decade, involving a 42-year-old Ugandan-born woman residing in Abuja who traveled to Uganda. NCDC Director-General Jide Idris emphasized that healthcare workers must rely on clinical vigilance and standard precautions, such as proper use of personal protective equipment and strict hand hygiene, rather than waiting for test results. The agency is currently collaborating with Federal Capital Territory health authorities to deploy infection prevention experts and assess priority facilities to ensure robust screening and triage capabilities. The initial detection of the case was attributed to healthcare providers recognizing specific clinical symptoms, which triggered alerts within the national event-based surveillance system.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency and administrative directives regarding disease control. While it involves government agencies, the content focuses strictly on medical protocols, epidemiological facts, and operational responses rather than partisan politics, policy debates, or power
Why factuality (95): Correctly conveys the directive to isolate before lab confirmation and the timeline of the case. Details on infection control measures match the official guidance described in other sources.
Why objectivity (95): Neutral tone. Clearly distinguishes between the NCDC's directives and the reporter's narration.
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) issued a warning that misinformation poses a significant threat to the country's containment efforts regarding a newly confirmed Ebola case in the Federal Capital Territory. During a briefing in Abuja, NCDC Director-General Jide Idris emphasized the need for the public to rely solely on verified information from authorized health agencies to prevent fear and maintain cooperation with contact tracing initiatives. The agency has identified 53 primary contacts associated with the index case, including healthcare workers and family members, all of whom are currently under monitoring but have not yet shown symptoms or tested positive. Idris highlighted that Nigeria is applying lessons learned from the successful containment of the 2014 outbreak, stressing that effective response requires active participation from both the government and the community. Public and private healthcare facilities have been instructed to enhance screening protocols and ensure adequate protection for medical staff.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency and official government guidance. While it involves state actors (NCDC), the content focuses strictly on epidemiological data, procedural instructions, and public safety warnings without engaging in partisan debate, policy criticism, or ideological sl
Why factuality (95): Accurately reports the warning against misinformation and the count of 53 contacts. Consistent with the timeline and details provided in the primary source and other articles.
Why objectivity (95): Objective. Presents the official warning and the rationale behind it without embellishment.
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has approved a weekly allowance of 100,000 naira for individuals quarantined due to potential exposure to a confirmed Ebola case in the Federal Capital Territory. NCDC Director-General Jide Idris announced the measure during a media briefing in Abuja, stating it was intended to address complaints from contacts regarding their inability to work or care for families while isolated. The agency noted that it already covers accommodation and food costs, but the new stipend serves as an unplanned emergency measure to ease financial strain. Officials reported identifying 53 primary contacts, including healthcare workers and household staff, who are undergoing monitoring for 21 days. Idris emphasized that state governments remain responsible for providing necessary facilities and funding during such public health emergencies.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific public health administrative decision and logistical measures taken by a national agency. While it involves government action, the content focuses on disease control protocols, resource allocation for quarantine, and epidemiological data rather than partisan debate,
Why factuality (95): Specifically addresses the financial aspect (N100,000 allowance) with accurate attribution to the DG. Explains the reason for the allowance (complaints from contacts) faithfully.
Why objectivity (95): Neutral and direct. Focuses on the economic relief measure and the justification provided by officials.
Nigeria’s Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has tracked 53 contacts of a confirmed Ebola case and ordered all hospitals to immediately isolate suspected patients without awaiting laboratory results. The confirmed case involves a 42-year-old woman who entered Nigeria from Uganda via Ethiopia in early October and tested positive for the Bundibugyo strain of the Ebola virus. While the patient has shown significant clinical improvement under isolation, NCDC Director-General Dr. Jide Idris emphasized that rapid isolation and strict infection control protocols are essential to prevent further spread among healthcare workers and the general population. Contact tracing remains a central component of the response, with the 53 identified individuals, including family members and hospital staff, undergoing mandatory 21-day monitoring periods. This local response occurs against the backdrop of a severe ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which African health agencies report is spreading rapidly and has resulted in hundreds of deaths.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health emergency and the subsequent administrative directives issued by a national disease control agency. The tone is strictly informational, relying on direct quotes from the NCDC Director-General regarding protocol changes and patient status. There is no evidence,
Why factuality (95): Combines the contact tracing update with the hospital directive accurately. The photo caption provides correct context regarding the DRC outbreak and MSF activities, aligning with the primary source's background info.
Why objectivity (95): Standard news writing. Maintains a detached perspective while summarizing the multi-faceted response (tracking + hospital orders).
The Bayelsa State Government announced that no cases of Ebola Virus Disease have been confirmed within the state, despite the recent identification of an imported case in Abuja by the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. During a press conference in Yenagoa, Health Commissioner Prof. Seiyefa Brisibe stated that authorities are implementing enhanced surveillance and emergency coordination across all eight local government areas to detect potential outbreaks early. The administration, led by Governor Douye Diri, has prioritized strengthening the State Emergency Operations Centre and improving infection prevention protocols among healthcare workers. Officials emphasized collaboration with international partners like the World Health Organization to align local responses with global public health standards. Residents were advised to remain vigilant regarding hygiene practices and symptom monitoring while avoiding the consumption of bushmeat and the spread of unverified rumors.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public health crisis response involving state government officials. While the subject involves government action, the tone is strictly informational and relies entirely on official statements regarding disease prevention and containment. There is no partisan conflict, policy
Why factuality (95): Accurate regarding the specific claim that no cases exist in Bayelsa State. Correctly cites the date of the Abuja case confirmation (Oct 20) and attributes statements properly to the State Commissioner.
Why objectivity (95): Neutral, informative tone. Presents official assurances and measures without editorializing.
An opinion piece by Azu Ishiekwene discusses a recent confirmed case of Ebola in Abuja, involving a 42-year-old woman who traveled from Uganda. The author highlights significant delays in the detection process, noting that 17 days passed between the patient's arrival and laboratory confirmation, while 12 days elapsed between symptom onset and official notification to the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC). Comparing this incident to the 2014 outbreak stopped by Dr. Stella Adadevoh, the article argues that Nigeria suffers from institutional 'memory loss' regarding disease preparedness. Although the patient and her husband have been evacuated to Switzerland for specialized care, the piece criticizes the healthcare system's slow response and lack of institutional diligence.
Bias read (Center): While the article critiques government and institutional performance (a political theme), the core subject is a specific public health event and medical protocol failure. The tone is critical of systemic inefficiency rather than partisan politics, making it moderately charged but primarily focusedon
Why factuality (85): Core facts (patient age, origin, dates, strain) align with the consensus of other reports. However, the opening paragraph contains subjective assertions about 'memory loss' and 'screen addiction' that are not supported by evidence.
Why objectivity (40): Highly opinionated and editorialized. Uses metaphors ('aso-ebi') and strong adjectives ('quiet', 'stubborn disregard') to frame the narrative, deviating significantly from neutral reporting.
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 20
The article reports that Nigerian authorities have identified a confirmed Ebola case in Abuja involving a 42-year-old Ugandan woman, described as the wife of a Swiss diplomat, who tested positive on October 20. The author criticizes the government's response as characterized by 'usual levity' and 'dangerous complacency,' using metaphors of mishandling weapons and snakes to describe the risk. To underscore the severity of the situation, the piece draws a parallel to the historical outbreak of a respiratory disease known as Pehé between 1827 and 1831 in the Old Oyo Empire. This historical event, cited from Samuel Johnson's 'History of the Yoruba,' resulted in the death of the emperor Alaafin Majootu and the destabilization of the empire. The article concludes by referencing a song by musician Kelani Yesufu to emphasize that pandemics do not discriminate based on social status or wealth.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the subject through a lens of strong criticism toward state institutions, accusing them of negligence and incompetence ('administrative lethargy'). While the specific ideological label 'Right' is inferred from the emphasis on traditional authority, historical continuity, and the '
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (20): Extremely biased and rhetorical. Uses heavy metaphor ('loaded rifle', 'deadly rattlesnake') and cultural references to criticize the government's response, making it a commentary piece rather than a news report.
Dr. Jide Idris, Director-General of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), stated that the N10 billion emergency intervention fund approved by President Bola Tinubu is intended for broad epidemic preparedness rather than solely addressing Ebola Virus Disease. Idris clarified that the funds were allocated directly to the NCDC, not the Presidential Task Force on Ebola, and cover threats such as Lassa fever, cholera, and measles. He noted that the N10 billion amount represents only about two percent of the estimated N104.4 billion annual cost required to implement Nigeria's National Action Plan for Health Security between 2025 and 2029. The approval came in June 2026 following an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, though Idris emphasized the request was for general health security. He highlighted that despite recent budget increases, including a N22 billion appropriation for 2026, significant funding gaps remain relative to international standards for health preparedness.
Bias read (Center): The article relies exclusively on official statements from the NCDC director-general to clarify the scope of a government-approved budget, presenting factual data and direct quotes without independent critical commentary or opposing viewpoints.
An opinion piece reviews Nigeria's successful management of a recent Ebola case involving a Ugandan-born woman who was subsequently evacuated to Switzerland for diplomatic reasons. The author highlights the role of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention in isolating the patient and tracing contacts, noting that the World Health Organization requires a 42-day observation period before certifying the country Ebola-free. Context is provided regarding the ongoing severe Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has resulted in thousands of deaths, as well as smaller outbreaks in neighboring countries. The article warns that Nigeria faces additional risk due to its U23 football team's upcoming qualifiers in the DR Congo, urging the Nigeria Football Federation to request a neutral venue to protect players. Finally, the text outlines general transmission risks related to environmental factors and contact with infected bodily fluids.
Bias read (Center): The article relies on official health data and presents a balanced view by acknowledging effective government response while offering a specific, non-partisan recommendation regarding sports logistics.
The Abia State Government has designated the Specialist Hospital and Diagnostic Centre in Amachara as a temporary Ebola isolation center until the new Infectious Disease Hospital in Aba is completed. This decision follows the National Center for Disease Control and Prevention urging states to enhance preparedness after Nigeria confirmed its first case of the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola in the Federal Capital Territory in October 2026. Abia was previously identified as having a moderate risk of importing the virus according to a May 2026 advisory. State Commissioner for Information Okey Kanu announced the move during a press briefing, noting that a multi-sectoral technical working group developed the state's response plan. Kanu confirmed that there are currently no reported cases of major public health emergencies, including Ebola, Lassa fever, and cholera, within the state. Additionally, the state announced plans to establish a modern Stroke and Neurovascular Centre in Amachara following recognition at an international neurosurgery symposium.
Bias read (Center): The report relies exclusively on official government statements regarding public health infrastructure and omits independent verification or critical analysis of the administration's prior performance.
Nigeria confirmed its first Ebola case in over a decade on October 20, involving a 42-year-old Ugandan-born woman residing in Abuja who had recently traveled from Uganda. In response, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention initiated contact tracing, identifying 44 initial close contacts, and implemented heightened surveillance measures across healthcare facilities. On October 26, the patient and her husband were medically evacuated to Switzerland for specialized treatment, leading the World Health Organization to declare that Nigeria no longer had any active confirmed cases, though monitoring of exposed individuals continues. Following the incident, authorities expanded health declaration requirements for all international travelers to improve border screening capabilities. Additionally, two suspected cases in Adamawa State tested negative, confirming the Abuja case as the sole laboratory-verified infection during this period.
Bias read (Center): The article relies exclusively on official announcements from the NCDC and WHO, presenting factual updates on disease status and government responses without employing loaded language or omitting critical context regarding the crisis.
Premium Times reports that a 34-year-old pilot and his wife, a medical doctor, were investigated for suspected Ebola Virus Disease in Adamawa State, Nigeria, after exhibiting symptoms such as fever, vomiting, and bleeding. Although Nigerian health authorities initially kept the identities of the two suspects confidential, the outlet revealed they were admitted to an isolation center at Modibbo Adama University Teaching Hospital on October 29, 2026. An internal memo from the state Ministry of Health indicated the pilot traveled to Kenya between October 14 and 25, having previously been treated for malaria. The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) confirmed that both individuals tested negative for Ebola after two rounds of laboratory testing. Consequently, the NCDC stated that there are no confirmed Ebola cases in Adamawa State, maintaining that the single confirmed case in the Federal Capital Territory remains the only active case in the country.
Bias read (Center): The article relies on official government memos and NCDC statements to report factual health data without employing loaded language or taking a partisan stance on the crisis management.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
NG
