The article reports on concerns raised by the Human Rights Agency regarding the mental health of children and adolescents in Slovenia. It highlights a lack of pediatric psychiatrists and clinical psychologists, long waiting times, and incomplete network of centers for youth mental health. The agency visited a counseling center in Ljubljana and emphasized the importance of early recognition of stress, accessible support in schools, and collaboration between healthcare, education, and social services. They also called for preventive measures and inclusive education that goes beyond physical presence in school, advocating for tailored support based on individual needs. Despite some progress with new legislation requiring schools to provide support upon identifying learning difficulties, challenges remain, including insufficient standards, documentation, and monitoring of interventions.
Bias read (Center): While the issue of child mental health is politically sensitive, the article presents a balanced account of the problem without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It cites official sources such as the Human Rights Agency and references legal frameworks like the Convention on theRights
Why factuality (75): The article discusses mental health issues among children and youth but does not mention anything related to data protection policies or privacy statements. The primary source document is about data protection policies for Delo media websites, so there is no overlap in content. However, the article
Why objectivity (85): The article presents information from the Ombudsman for Human Rights and quotes officials from a counseling center. It uses neutral language overall, though it includes some evaluative statements like 'težje dostopna' (more difficult to access) which slightly affects neutrality.





