ON
← Back to feed
End of 'total peace': communities uneasy and rulers optimistic
CO🏛️ PoliticsConservative20 days ago

End of 'total peace': communities uneasy and rulers optimistic

The article discusses the end of peace talks between the Colombian government under President Gustavo Petro and armed groups in the Amazon region. The new president, Abelardo de la Espriella, has declared dialogue efforts 'completely exhausted,' signaling a shift toward military action against armed groups. This move has caused concern among communities fearing potential conflict, while some regional governors express optimism about the government’s tougher stance. Former negotiator Armando Novoa highlights ongoing successes in disarmament but notes lack of communication with the new administration. Despite efforts to reach out, there has been no engagement with the incoming government regarding continued negotiations.

President Abelardo de la Espriella has declared the end of Colombia’s so-called “total peace” strategy, a diplomatic approach aimed at negotiating with armed groups through dialogue. Speaking before military units of the Pichincha Battalion in Cali, he stated that the option of dialogue had been exhausted and that the state would take a firm stance against crime under his leadership. His remarks marked the official closure of negotiations initiated by the previous government led by President Gustavo Petro, which sought to reach agreements with armed factions operating in the Amazon region. The strategy known as “total peace” included two main negotiation tables: one involving dissidents linked to the group known as “Calarcá” and the Eastern Bolivarian Army (EMBF), and another with the Frontline Commands affiliated with the National Bolivarian Army (CNEB). Despite expectations that these groups might present their reports to the new administration, they were left empty-handed after the government decided to terminate the talks. The delegates returned to secrecy, while communities in the Amazon region expressed mixed feelings, some welcoming the new government's shift toward a more forceful approach, others fearing potential negative consequences. Last Wednesday afternoon, leaders from both sides met for the final time to assess the progress made during the negotiations. Armando Novoa, who was previously the chief negotiator for the table involving the National Bolivarian Army, noted that dismantling the institutional framework established by the peace process would not be easy. He mentioned that resources and funds already committed to the initiative could not simply be discarded. Novoa recently visited the Valley of Guamuez, where he accounted to local communities for achievements such as the destruction of 14.5 tons of explosives, the demobilization of 99 fighters, who remain in a Temporary Location Zone, and a nearly 50 percent reduction in homicides in Putumayo and Nariño. However, there was no contact made with the incoming government. Novoa explained that various channels had been used to establish communication with the new administration, including reaching out to the vice president and the minister of justice. He expressed hope that the interior minister would listen to their concerns to ensure decisions were made based on informed knowledge rather than hastily. So far, however, these efforts have gone unanswered. The only confirmation received was the president's reaffirmation that all negotiation tables would be terminated. Attempts to get responses from the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Justice, and the official spokesperson of the new government yielded no results. Effectively, even without formally revoking the decrees that allowed these discussions to proceed, the negotiation tables ceased to function. There is currently no contact between government delegates and representatives of the armed groups in the table involving the CNEB. Numbers associated with spokespeople who once engaged with the press are no longer active. The suspension of the table not only halts the negotiations but also affects related projects. Specifically, in Putumayo and Nariño, the RenHacemos program, which aims to replace illicit crops, has been implemented with 8,000 families enrolled. Additionally, a Temporary Location Zone (ZUT) was set up where 99 individuals from the Frontline Commands reside. Following the arrival of the new government and anticipating the end of the negotiations, residents of the ZUT have distanced themselves from the group to continue their reintegration process independently, avoiding possible conflicts with public forces or the extradition of alias “Araña,” the leader of the group who was captured during the negotiations. They will stay until December 25, provided the incoming government allows it. Residents of the ZUT have extended an invitation to the new government to visit them directly. They emphasized that their doors remain open for any officials interested in understanding their situation firsthand.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

La Silla Vacía logoLa Silla VacíaIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 6020 days ago
End of 'total peace': communities uneasy and rulers optimistic

The article discusses the end of peace talks between the Colombian government under President Gustavo Petro and armed groups in the Amazon region. The new president, Abelardo de la Espriella, has declared dialogue efforts 'completely exhausted,' signaling a shift toward military action against armed groups. This move has caused concern among communities fearing potential conflict, while some regional governors express optimism about the government’s tougher stance. Former negotiator Armando Novoa highlights ongoing successes in disarmament but notes lack of communication with the new administration. Despite efforts to reach out, there has been no engagement with the incoming government regarding continued negotiations.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the government's decision to end peace talks as a necessary and justified shift toward military strength, emphasizing state authority and security over negotiation. It portrays the previous peace strategy ('paz total') as ineffective and the current approach as more decisive. The

Why factuality (75): The article references the end of 'paz total' but does not explicitly mention Resolución 298 de 2026 or the specific names of individuals removed from the dialogue. It discusses the broader policy shift under President De la Espriella but lacks precise details from the primary document. Some context

Why objectivity (60): The article presents a clear political stance favoring military action over peace negotiations, using phrases like 'el Estado bajo el régimen que ha terminado fue suficientemente cómplice' and 'contundente y certero contra el crimen.' This framing leans toward supporting the new government’s approac

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories