ON
← Back to feed
‘Our loved ones still in captivity despite raising N155m ransom’  —  Kidnap victims’ families
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter19 days ago

‘Our loved ones still in captivity despite raising N155m ransom’  —  Kidnap victims’ families

Families of victims of a May 2026 attack on Woro and Nuku communities in Kwara State, Nigeria, say they paid over N155 million in ransom but were denied the release of their abducted relatives. The attack, attributed to over 100 armed assailants, resulted in at least 260 deaths, 30 homes destroyed, and 176 people kidnapped. Community leaders report that the ransom was rejected by the kidnappers, who claimed it was insufficient. Families now demand government action, noting that victims from a similar kidnapping in Oyo State were rescued by authorities. The attack followed local resistance to an extremist religious group attempting to establish itself in the region. Survivors describe the attackers as wearing military-style uniforms and using motorcycles. The incident highlights rising insecurity in North-Central Nigeria.

Families of victims in the Woro and Nuku communities of Kaiama Local Government Area, Kwara State, have expressed despair after five months of uncertainty, stating that more than N155 million collected as ransom failed to secure the release of their abducted relatives. The families, speaking through community leaders, revealed that the money was rejected by the kidnappers, leaving them powerless to act further. They have called upon both the federal and state governments to intervene urgently, citing the prolonged absence of their loved ones. The attack occurred on February 3, 2026, when over 100 heavily armed assailants launched a violent assault on the two communities. According to local reports, the attackers, believed to be members of an armed group, killed more than 260 people, set fire to over 30 homes, and abducted 176 residents. This marked one of the deadliest and most destructive incidents in the region in recent years. Community leaders described the attack as a coordinated operation, noting that the perpetrators wore military-style uniforms and used motorcycles to evade detection. Alhaji Abdul Ibrahim, acting on behalf of the affected families, recounted the emotional toll of the tragedy. He shared that he personally lost ten relatives and still has 35 family members held captive. Despite the community's collective effort to raise N155 million in ransom, the funds were rejected by the kidnappers, who claimed the amount was insufficient. The families returned the money and have not received any communication from their missing relatives since. Ibrahim emphasized that the government must take immediate action, as the families feel abandoned and unable to resolve the situation themselves. Nigerian law prohibits the payment of ransom to kidnappers, yet the families' attempt highlights the desperation of those impacted by such crimes. The case has drawn comparisons to another recent incident in Oyo State, where a high court judge was successfully rescued by security forces after his family allegedly paid a ransom. In contrast, the families of the Woro and Nuku victims remain in limbo, adding to their sense of helplessness and anger. Community leader Alhaji Sulaiman Bukata, known as Dan Sadaukin Kaiama, noted that residents recently organized a peaceful demonstration to demand attention for the abducted individuals, many of whom are women, children, and nursing mothers. He alleged that the kidnappers had issued threats against the captives, warning that some would be forced into marriages and others might face harm if the government did not act. While these claims have not been independently verified, they underscore the heightened risks faced by the hostages. Lawmaker Hon. Sa’idu Baba Ahmed, representing the area in the Kwara State House of Assembly, echoed the families’ concerns, urging the federal government to increase its efforts to locate and rescue the captives. He pointed out that the lack of progress has exacerbated the suffering of the affected families, emphasizing the need for swift governmental response. The attack on Woro and Nuku appears to have stemmed from tensions between the local population and an armed group seeking to expand its influence in the area. Residents reportedly rejected the group’s attempts to establish an extremist religious presence, leading to the violent confrontation. Survivors described how the attackers systematically killed residents, destroyed property, and abducted numerous individuals before escaping. This incident reflects the broader pattern of insecurity in North-Central Nigeria, where armed groups continue to target rural communities with increasing frequency.

3 reports

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7524 days ago
‘Our loved ones still in captivity despite raising N155m ransom’  —  Kidnap victims’ families

Families of victims of a May 2026 attack on Woro and Nuku communities in Kwara State, Nigeria, say they paid over N155 million in ransom but were denied the release of their abducted relatives. The attack, attributed to over 100 armed assailants, resulted in at least 260 deaths, 30 homes destroyed, and 176 people kidnapped. Community leaders report that the ransom was rejected by the kidnappers, who claimed it was insufficient. Families now demand government action, noting that victims from a similar kidnapping in Oyo State were rescued by authorities. The attack followed local resistance to an extremist religious group attempting to establish itself in the region. Survivors describe the attackers as wearing military-style uniforms and using motorcycles. The incident highlights rising insecurity in North-Central Nigeria.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, quoting directly from affected families, community leaders, and a state legislator. It does not favor any political side, nor does it editorialize or omit critical context. The focus is on the humanitarian crisis and the failure of authorities to act,

Why factuality (90): The article reports on a mass kidnapping in Kwara State, citing a local leader's statements and aligning with broader narratives about ransom payments and government inaction. It references a specific date, casualty figures, and legal prohibitions on ransom payments, which are consistent with typica

Why objectivity (75): The tone is sympathetic and highlights the distress of the families, using emotive language like 'lamented' and 'renewing calls for urgent government intervention.' While it presents facts, it frames the situation as a failure of government action, potentially influencing reader perception.

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7027 days ago
Why I blocked terrorists when my wife was abducted – Oyo principal’s husband

The husband of Rachael Alamu, an Oyo State school principal kidnapped by gunmen in May 2026, shared his experiences at a thanksgiving service following her release after over 50 days in captivity. He explained that blocking the kidnappers' phone numbers during negotiations was necessary due to their threatening behavior affecting his health. Alamu described the ordeal as the most challenging moment for his family, disrupting their peaceful, faith-centered life. He praised the quick response of security agencies and emphasized the importance of maintaining faith during hardship, urging others to remain steadfast in their beliefs.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a sensitive issue involving terrorism and government response, the framing remains balanced. It presents the husband's personal account without overtly criticizing or praising any political entity. The focus is on individual experience and religious reflection rather than

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed accounts from the husband of the abducted school principal, including his physical and emotional state, and corroborates the timeline of the abduction and subsequent rescue. It cites previous reporting from PUNCH Online, enhancing credibility. However, it omits details

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language describing the impact on the family and the husband's health, which may sway readers' perceptions. While it acknowledges the government's role in the rescue, it emphasizes the personal struggle rather than presenting a balanced view of all parties involv

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6519 days ago
How we secured Kebbi High Court judge’s release – Family

Justice Faruku Bunza, a Kebbi High Court judge kidnapped for ransom, was released after negotiations between his family and kidnappers. The family claims they paid ₦50 million along with soft drinks and biscuits, while the Kebbi State Police Command denies any ransom was paid. Relatives confirm the judge returned home in good health, and the incident has reignited concerns about kidnapping for ransom in Nigeria. A family member described seeing the judge exit a vehicle, suggesting his release occurred around 8 am on Monday.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the family's claim of paying a ransom and the police command's denial, without overtly favoring either side. It includes multiple perspectives, family members, police, and a relative, and does not exhibit strong ideological leaning. The focus remains on the factual dispute, a

Why factuality (75): The article presents conflicting accounts regarding the ransom payment for Justice Bunza's release, one from the police command and another from the family. It includes quotes from both sides but does not resolve the discrepancy, leading to potential misinformation. The lack of corroboration between

Why objectivity (65): The narrative leans toward the family's version of events, emphasizing their relief and celebration, while downplaying the police's official stance. This creates a biased portrayal favoring the family's perspective, suggesting a lack of neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories