The secretary of state is said to be under investigation for alleged corruption.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 100Objective 954 days ago

The article reports on allegations of serious corruption against Državni sekretar Damijan Jaklin, who is accused of abusing his position, accepting bribes, and money laundering during the construction of an 8 million euro section of the water supply system in Pomurje. Jaklin, who has been under criminal investigation in the Dars affair led by then Minister for Defense Valentin Hajdinjak, is now allegedly receiving over 60,000 euros illegally, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. The project, valued at over 300 million euros and involving 27 municipalities and 120,000 residents, was divided into three parts, with Jaklin overseeing the approximately 10 million euro 'System A' portion. The article cites unconfirmed information suggesting Jaklin will soon face charges from the Specialized State Prosecution Office (SDT). It describes communication between Jaklin and contractor Jan Habjan via SMS and emails, including references to fictitious contracts and financial arrangements. A detailed Excel table outlining these activities was reportedly found in Habjan’s home computer.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the corruption allegations as a significant political issue, emphasizing the involvement of high-ranking officials and the potential legal consequences. While it presents factual claims about Jaklin's alleged misconduct, the tone suggests a critical stance toward those in power, a

Why these scores (Factual 100 · Objective 95): Directly mirrors the primary source document, accurately reporting the allegations against Jaklin, the nature of the alleged crimes, and the status of the investigation. Maintains neutrality in tone.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 953 days ago

The article reports on a response by Slovenian State Secretary Damijan Jaklin to allegations of corruption. Jaklin denies any wrongdoing, stating he has never abused his public position for personal gain. He claims to be unaware of any criminal investigations or indictment against him and asserts that he will provide a full response once fully informed. However, the article also mentions that according to unverified information from POP TV, a specialized state prosecutor is investigating Jaklin over corruption allegations. It suggests that Jaklin allegedly accepted nearly 62,000 euros in cash through fictitious contracts and companies to secure contracts for a Serbian firm and another local enterprise. The article further notes that investigators reportedly found a contract draft suggesting Jaklin would receive a 15% commission for securing EU-funded projects, and that Jaklin questions how such information could surface in the media before being disclosed to those involved in the investigation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin in a manner that emphasizes potential misconduct and corruption, using terms like 'podkupnine' (bribes) and 'pranje denarja' (money laundering). While it presents both Jaklin’s denial and the accusations, the tone leans toward highlighting the legal,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 95): Accurately reports Jaklin's denial of wrongdoing and his refusal to comment further. Provides context about his legal stance and maintains an objective tone.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 903 days ago

The article discusses allegations of corruption against Damijan Jaklin, the state secretary under Infrastructure Minister Jernej Vrtovec of the New Slovenia party. According to leaked documents obtained by the publication, Jaklin allegedly received over €60,000 in bribes, including cash payments and gifts such as LEGO bricks valued at €662 for his son. The alleged bribes were linked to a contract involving European Union funds for a water pipeline project in Pomurje. The documents suggest that Jaklin was supposed to receive a 15% commission from the value of the work. Jana Habjan, owner of the company involved in the project, reportedly handed over the money to Jaklin. Jaklin has denied the allegations, stating he did not request or accept any undue benefits and did not abuse his public position for personal gain. Jana Habjan also denies the claims, asserting that the contracts were never finalized and that the documents were fabricated by an individual who is also under suspicion. The New Slovenia party frames these revelations as a political witch hunt rather than addressing the accusations directly.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents detailed evidence suggesting corruption within a prominent political figure and his associates, focusing on financial transactions and legal documents. It highlights the potential misuse of public office for private benefit, which aligns with left-leaning concerns about systemic

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Accurately presents the allegations against Jaklin and his denial. Includes direct quotes from Jaklin's response, maintaining objectivity while presenting both sides of the story.

Info360IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 903 days ago

The article reports on an investigation into Damijan Jaklin, the state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, who is accused of corruption related to the construction of an eight million euro section of the Pomur water pipeline. According to POP TV, Jaklin is alleged to have illegally received 60,000 euros through fictitious contracts and shell companies, primarily in cash. The investigation, led by the Specialized State Prosecutor’s Office, claims he abused his position, accepted bribes, and engaged in money laundering. Jaklin's lawyer denies any knowledge of the proceedings and asserts that his client has always acted legally and professionally. The case involves a Serbian construction company, MPP Jedinstvo, and another firm under the leadership of Jane Habjan, which was overseeing the pipeline project. Habjan allegedly received a 15% commission from the fake contract, and evidence was reportedly found during home searches and on Habjan's computer. Jaklin has denied all allegations in the preliminary hearing, while a director from the Serbian firm Mića Mićić claims that nothing illegal occurred. Minister Jernej Vrtovcu has not yet commented on the matter.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the accusations against Jaklin in a manner that emphasizes potential misuse of power and systemic corruption, aligning with left-leaning narratives that often highlight institutional misconduct. While the facts are presented neutrally, the focus on the role of state officials and壳

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Accurate summary of the primary source, covering the alleged corruption, the role of SDT, and the involvement of fake companies. Maintains a neutral and objective tone.

Siol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 903 days ago

The article reports that a specialized state prosecutor has initiated an investigation into the corruption allegations against Damijan Jaklin, the State Secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, and Zupan of Velika Polana. According to POP TV, the criminal investigators allege that Jaklin abused his position, accepted bribes, and engaged in money laundering related to the construction of an approximately eight million euro section of the Pomurska water pipeline. The report claims Jaklin illegally received over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and companies used as shell entities. The alleged fictitious contracts involved Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and the company JHP under the leadership of Jane Habjan, who was overseeing the construction project. Habjan allegedly received a 15% commission. The report mentions that investigators had access to SMS messages between the alleged parties and a table describing their alleged conduct, which one of the parties provided and was later found on Habjan’s computer during home searches. Jaklin denied any involvement, stating he was not aware of any proceedings or home searches and claimed他曾

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin and Habjan using terms like 'corruption,' 'bribes,' 'money laundering,' and 'fictitious contracts,' which carry strong negative connotations typically associated with left-leaning narratives. It emphasizes the legal violations and potential illegitim

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article accurately reports the allegations against Jaklin, including the fake contracts, the involvement of Jane Habjan, and the potential indictment. It also includes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and mentions the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The content matches the

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 903 days ago

The article reports on a corruption scandal involving Jaklin, who is alleged to have received over 60,000 euros in cash through fictitious contracts and shell companies during the construction of an 8 million euro section of the water pipeline in Murau. Criminal investigators under the Specialized State Prosecution Office accuse him of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering. They claim he colluded with Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and the company JHP led by Jane Habjan, which was overseeing the project. Most of the funds from the fictitious contract allegedly ended up in Jaklin’s hands via four shell companies, with Habjan receiving a 15% commission. Evidence includes SMS messages between key figures and a table detailing their actions, found during home searches. Jaklin denies any wrongdoing, stating he has not been informed of any proceedings and claims to have acted lawfully. Habjan disputes all allegations, and a Serbian company director confirms he was interviewed but believes the investigation will find no illegality. The minister for infrastructure and energy, Jernej Vrtovec, has not yet commented.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the scandal as a clear case of corruption, emphasizing the involvement of political figures and the misuse of public funds. It highlights the legal violations and presents the evidence against Jaklin and Habjan, suggesting a systemic issue within political circles. While it does公正

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Accurately summarizes the primary source, including the alleged bribery, involvement of SDT, and Jaklin's denial through his lawyer. Maintains a neutral tone throughout.

Žurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 904 days ago

Damijan Jaklin, a prominent member of the NSi party and mayor of Velika Polana, is reportedly under investigation by the Specialized State Prosecution for alleged corruption related to the construction of a section of the Pomur water pipeline. According to unconfirmed reports from POP TV, Jaklin is accused of abuse of office, accepting bribes, and money laundering, allegedly receiving over €60,000 in cash through fictitious contracts and shell companies. The investigation suggests he facilitated a €100,000 fake contract between a Serbian construction firm and another company overseeing the pipeline project. Much of the money was allegedly funneled through four shell companies into Jaklin’s possession, while the contractor received a 15% commission. A table detailing transactions was reportedly provided to investigators, later found during house searches at the contractor’s residence. Jaklin denied any knowledge of the proceedings and stated no house searches were conducted. His lawyer claimed he has always acted legally and professionally. The contractor involved confirmed being questioned but believes the investigation will ultimately find no wrongdoing. Minister Jernej Vrtovec, a

Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on allegations of corruption involving a high-profile politician from the NSi party, which is a center-right political entity in Slovenia. The framing emphasizes the accusations against Jaklin, including bribery and money laundering, using terms like 'fictitious contracts' and 'b

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, mentioning Jaklin's alleged corruption, the involvement of fake contracts, and the potential indictment. It quotes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and references the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The content ali

DeloIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 904 days ago

The article reports that a specialized state prosecutor has initiated an investigation into State Secretary Damijan Jaklin of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, along with the mayor of Velika Polana, over corruption allegations. The investigation centers on accusations of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight-million-euro section of the Pomurski water pipeline. Jaklin allegedly received over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. Investigators claim he colluded in signing over 100,000 euros worth of fake contracts between Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and JHP, which was under state control. Most of the funds reportedly ended up in Jaklin’s hands, while Habjan received a 15% commission. Evidence included SMS messages and a table detailing the transactions, found during home searches. Jaklin faces direct charges of corruption, while Habjan’s legal team has rejected all allegations. A Serbian company director confirmed being interviewed but believes the case will ultimately show no wrongdoing. Minister Jernej Vrtovec has not yet been informed and thus does not have

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the corruption allegations against Jaklin and Habjan in a manner that emphasizes their alleged involvement in illegal activities, including bribery and money laundering. It highlights the role of state-controlled entities and the potential misuse of public funds, which aligns with

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, mentioning Jaklin's alleged corruption, the involvement of fake contracts, and the potential indictment. It quotes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and references the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The only minor

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 904 days ago

The specialized state prosecution is reportedly investigating Damijan Jaklin, the secretary of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy and mayor of Velika Polana, over alleged corruption related to the construction of an 8 million euro section of the Pomur water pipeline. According to reports by POP TV, Jaklin is accused of abusing his position, accepting bribes, and money laundering through fictitious contracts involving Serbian construction firm MPP Jedinstvo and company JHP led by Jane Habjan. The investigation suggests Jaklin received over 60,000 euros in cash via shell companies, while Habjan allegedly received a 15% commission. A table detailing these transactions was reportedly provided by one of the parties involved and later found during house searches on Habjan’s computer. Jaklin denied any knowledge of the proceedings and stated he has always acted legally and professionally. Habjan claimed all allegations were rejected during the preliminary process. The minister for infrastructure and energy, Jernej Vrtovec, stated he had not been informed of the matter yet.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the investigation into a high-ranking official and a member of the NSi party, which is generally considered a center-right political entity in Slovenia. The framing emphasizes potential wrongdoing by a prominent figure within a conservative party, suggesting a critical stance. S

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Accurate summary of the primary source, includes key details like the alleged corruption involving Jaklin, the 60,000 euro bribe, and the involvement of SDT. Slightly less detailed than the primary source but still faithful.

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 904 days ago

The article reports on allegations of corruption against Državni sekretar Damijan Jaklin, who was previously the mayor of Velika Polana. According to a report by 24ur, criminal investigators under specialized prosecutors accuse Jaklin of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight million euro section of the Pomurska water supply system. The accusations include receiving over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. Investigators claim that Jaklin facilitated and collaborated in signing over 100,000 euros worth of fictitious contracts between Serbian contractor MPP Jedinstvo and the company JHP Jane Habjan. Most of the funds from these fictitious contracts were funneled into four shell companies specifically set up for this purpose, which ended up in Jaklin’s hands. Evidence includes SMS messages and Excel tables provided by one of the bribe recipients, later found during home searches. Jaklin has denied involvement, claiming he was unaware of any proceedings, while his lawyer stated that without the active participation of whistleblowers, there would be no criminal prosecution. Meanwhile,Š

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the allegations against Damijan Jaklin in a manner that emphasizes the seriousness of the corruption charges, citing detailed evidence such as SMS messages and Excel tables. It highlights the involvement of high-profile figures like the minister and the director of a Serbian公司,并

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article accurately reports the allegations against Jaklin, including the fake contracts, the involvement of Jane Habjan, and the potential indictment. It also includes Jaklin's denial through his lawyer and mentions the SMS exchanges and Excel table found during searches. The content matches the

Svet24IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 904 days ago

The article reports that Damijan Jaklin, the State Secretary, is at the center of a new corruption scandal. The focus is on allegations involving Jaklin, who holds a prominent governmental position. The specifics of the accusations, such as the nature of the alleged misconduct or evidence presented, are not detailed in the provided text. The situation has likely sparked public interest and scrutiny regarding potential misuse of power or unethical behavior within the government. Further investigation or official statements would be necessary to fully understand the scope of the allegations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on a high-ranking official involved in a corruption scandal, which is inherently politically charged. The framing suggests criticism of a government figure, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that often highlight issues of accountability and anti-corruption efforts. However,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Provides accurate information from the primary source, including the alleged bribery and involvement of SDT. The title is slightly sensational but the content remains factual and balanced.

Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 854 days ago

The article reports that a specialized state prosecutor's office is investigating the head of Velika Polana municipality, Damijan Jaklin, along with a state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, over allegations of corruption. The investigation centers on suspected abuse of position, acceptance of bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight million euro section of the Pomurski water pipeline. Jaklin is alleged to have received over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. The investigation also involves the case of Dars, where Jaklin was allegedly involved in the signing of over 100,000 euros worth of fictitious contracts between Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and JHP, which was under state control. Most of the funds from these fictitious contracts reportedly ended up in Jaklin’s hands through four shell companies, while Habjan received a 15% commission. Jaklin denied knowledge of any proceedings and stated he has always acted lawfully and professionally. The minister for infrastructure and energy, Jernej Vrtovec, has not yet been informed of the matter.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin and others in a manner that emphasizes systemic corruption and misuse of public funds, aligning with left-leaning critiques of political elites and bureaucratic misconduct. While the facts are presented objectively, the focus on corruption within the

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Includes accurate details from the primary source but adds some commentary about Jernej Vrtovec not being informed, which isn't explicitly stated in the original text. Tone leans slightly towards narrative style.

Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 854 days ago

The article reports that a special state prosecutor's office is investigating the mayor of Velika Polana, Damijan Jaklin, and a state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy over corruption allegations related to a €8 million water pipeline project. Jaklin claims he is unaware of any proceedings and asserts he has always acted lawfully and professionally. The investigation alleges that Jaklin received over €60,000 illegally, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. It also accuses him of colluding with Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and local company JHP under the supervision of Jane Habjan, who allegedly received a 15% commission. Evidence reportedly includes SMS messages and a table detailing the transactions, which were found during home searches. Habjan denied all accusations, stating they were rejected in the preliminary hearing, while a director of the alleged Serbian company confirmed he was interviewed. The minister involved has not yet commented.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin and Habjan in a manner that emphasizes their potential wrongdoing, using terms like 'fictitious contracts,' 'illegal receipt of money,' and 'corruption.' While it presents both parties' responses, the focus on the alleged misconduct and the detailed,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Accurately reports the allegations against Jaklin, including the 60,000 euro bribe and the involvement of SDT. Adds minor details about the Lego bricks, which are present in the primary source but not central to the core facts.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 804 days ago

The article reports that Damijan Jaklin, a prominent member of the NSi party and state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, is under investigation by the specialized state prosecutor’s office for corruption allegations. The investigation centers around accusations of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering related to the construction of an eight-million-euro section of the Pomurski water pipeline. According to the report, Jaklin allegedly received over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash, through fictitious contracts and shell companies. The investigation suggests he was involved in arranging more than 100,000 euros worth of fictitious contracts between Serbian construction company MPP Jedinstvo and JHP, which was supervised by Jane Habjan. Most of the funds from these fictitious contracts reportedly ended up in Jaklin’s hands, while Habjan received a 15% commission. The alleged activities were detailed in a table provided by one of the parties involved, and the table was later found during home searches on Habjan’s computer. Jaklin denied any knowledge of the proceedings and stated that his work has always been legal and professional. Habjan and other

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the investigation as a legitimate legal process targeting a high-ranking political figure, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges (corruption, bribery, money laundering). While the article presents factual claims without overtly attacking Jaklin personally, it highlights the '

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately reflects the corruption allegations against Jaklin, including the role of fictitious contracts and cash payments. It maintains an objective tone but ends abruptly, possibly affecting completeness.

Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 604 days ago

The article discusses Branko Grims, a prominent Slovenian politician, who has faced significant criticism or sanctions at the European level. The term 'rdeč karton' translates to 'red card,' suggesting a formal reprimand or expulsion from a European institution or political group. Grims has been involved in various controversies, including allegations of corruption and misuse of public funds. This development highlights ongoing scrutiny of his actions within the European context.

Bias read (Center): The article appears to present the event factually without overtly favoring any particular side. It mentions the red card as a sanction but does not provide explicit commentary or biased language that would indicate a clear leaning towards either supporting or criticizing Grims.

Why these scores (Factual 50 · Objective 60): This article is unrelated to the main event and discusses an entirely different topic (Branko Grims' exclusion from a European committee). It provides no relevant information about Jaklin or the corruption allegations. The factuality score is very low because it does not address the subject at all.

+Portal (Portal Plus)IndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 404 days ago

The article criticizes former Slovenian Prime Minister Alenka Bratušek for allegedly overlooking significant corruption allegations against her own party. While her commission is investigating potential illegal funding of the Fokus party, the article highlights that no action has been taken regarding a 2.5 million EUR alleged corrupt transfer into her personal account from the 'second track' project, which was publicly disclosed by a former secretary of the Freedom Movement. The author suggests this could be a deliberate attempt to divert attention from these issues.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a deliberate attempt to shift focus away from corruption within Bratušek's party, implying a lack of accountability. It emphasizes the contrast between the investigation into Fokus and the ignored allegations against Bratušek, suggesting a biased narrative favoring揭露（

Why these scores (Factual 30 · Objective 40): Irrelevant to the main event, focuses on unrelated political criticism rather than the corruption allegations against Jaklin. Contains no factual information related to the primary source.