An Indian consumer court ruled that Maruti Suzuki must either replace a customer's car or pay compensation after the customer claimed that the mandatory use of E20 ethanol-blended fuel damaged his vehicle. This decision could set a precedent, potentially increasing liability for automakers under India's ethanol policy. The E20 program, which blends 20% ethanol into gasoline, aims to reduce oil imports and lower emissions but has faced criticism for being implemented too rapidly without providing alternatives for drivers. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government and major carmakers have defended the policy as safe, though legal experts suggest this ruling might encourage more consumers to seek compensation for similar issues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing both the court's ruling and the government's defense of the E20 policy. It does not favor one side over the other, merely outlining the controversy and potential implications without overtly biased language or selective sourcing.




