The recent drama involving popular reality TV participants Marija and Miljana Kulić has sparked widespread attention, particularly after they found themselves in an unexpected situation during their vacation on the Croatian island of Brač. The pair had planned to spend their holiday away from the usual destinations, choosing instead the picturesque town of Bol on Brač, known for its stunning coastal views and tranquil atmosphere. However, their expectations were quickly dashed when the apartment they had reserved was suddenly canceled just before their arrival.
According to Marija Kulić, who shared her experience on her YouTube channel, the apartment was booked through a friend named Jaca, who resides on the island and is well-acquainted with local conditions. The initial arrangement went smoothly—everything from booking to pricing was agreed upon. Yet, within twenty minutes, the situation took a dramatic turn. As Jaca left to have coffee, the landlord, who turned out to be from Sarajevo, reviewed the documents and saw the names of Marija and Miljana Kulić. She then called Jaca back, informing her that another guest had unexpectedly arrived and the apartment was no longer available.
This sudden change led to confusion and frustration among the two women. Marija described the incident as shocking, emphasizing how quickly the situation shifted. She noted that the landlord's decision seemed to hinge solely on the identity of the guests, suggesting a bias based on their public recognition. Despite this setback, Marija stated that they managed to find an alternative accommodation, which she considered a better fit. She also pointed out that the original apartment did not justify the price they had been quoted.
The following day, Miljana Kulić offered her own interpretation of the situation. During a conversation with her mother over breakfast, she theorized that the landlord might have been influenced by her presence in reality shows. Miljana suggested that the landlord could have followed her career and assumed she would cause trouble, perhaps even creating chaos similar to what viewers had seen in past episodes. She further speculated that the landlord might have been wary of her due to previous conflicts with other participants from the Balkans, including a disagreement with someone named Ana. Miljana expressed disbelief that the landlord would have anything against her personally, claiming that she believed the landlord thought she was “crazy.”
Both women have since spoken about the experience, highlighting the emotional impact of being treated differently simply because of their fame. While the situation caused some distress, both have remained composed, focusing on finding solutions rather than dwelling on the negative aspects. Their ability to adapt and find new accommodations has been praised by fans and media alike.
Looking ahead, the Kulić sisters continue to focus on their work and personal lives, maintaining their active presence in the entertainment industry. They remain optimistic about future opportunities, especially given their recent success in earning substantial income from their television appearances. As they move forward, the incident serves as a reminder of the challenges that come with public visibility, but also of their resilience and resourcefulness in overcoming obstacles.
2 reports
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7513 days ago MARIA AND MILJAN KULIC DO NOT WANT TO HOME: "When she saw our papers, she immediately said that there were no rooms available"Marija and Miljana Kulić, participants in a reality TV show, faced an unpleasant situation during their vacation in Bol, Croatia. They had previously booked an apartment through a friend who lives on the island of Brač. However, shortly before their arrival, the apartment owner suddenly canceled the booking. According to Marija Kulić, the owner saw their documents, noticed their names, and called her friend to inform them that the accommodation was no longer available. The incident caused frustration among the pair, with Miljana later speculating that the owner might have been influenced by her behavior on the reality show, including past conflicts with other contestants. The two women reportedly earned €30,000 in just over a month from their participation in the show.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a personal experience involving private individuals and does not present any overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. It provides both perspectives from Marija and Miljana Kulić without taking a stance on the issue.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): This article presents the event clearly and concisely, citing Marija Kulić’s account directly. It avoids embellishment and sticks closely to the reported facts. While it does include some direct quotes, it maintains a more neutral tone compared to the first article, though it still focuses on the ce
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 6513 days ago KULIĆKE experienced a shock in Brač - they booked an apartment, followed by KAOS as soon as the owner saw the NAMES!Marija and Miljana Kulić, known reality TV participants, decided to spend their vacation in Croatia on the island of Brač instead of their usual destinations. They booked an apartment through a local friend named Jaca, but after the owner saw their names on the documents, she canceled the reservation. The sisters claimed the owner, who is originally from Sarajevo, changed her mind upon realizing they were famous reality show stars. According to Marija, the situation was resolved quickly, and they found a better accommodation option. Miljana speculated that the cancellation might have been due to her public reputation and past conflicts with other participants from the region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Marija's account of the owner's reaction and Miljana's speculation about the owner's possible biases—without overtly favoring one side. It does not take a clear stance on the issue, focusing instead on recounting the events and the participants' interpretations
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides detailed quotes from Marija Kulić and describes the events as she recounted them. However, it includes sensationalized language such as 'HAOS' and references to a separate unrelated story about 'ODSEKLA MU POLNI ORGAN I UBILA GA,' which may not be relevant to the main event. The
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter