ON
← Back to feed
The correspondence between two film classics and two outlaws within their home cultures is a reader's experience for those who share their epoch.
Croatia🎭 CultureProgressive7 days ago

The correspondence between two film classics and two outlaws within their home cultures is a reader's experience for those who share their epoch.

The article discusses a book titled 'Velike priče' which features correspondence between two Serbian filmmakers, Goran Marković and Rajko Grlić, who were both former dissidents under the Yugoslav socialist regime. The book explores their contrasting personalities and experiences, highlighting their different paths after the fall of socialism. Marković was expelled from his academic position and faced restrictions on filmmaking under President Aleksandar Vučić, while Grlić had to leave Croatia in 1991 and later returned to work in Serbia. The book serves as a reflection on their shared historical epoch and personal journeys.

A pair of iconic filmmakers and two former dissidents have engaged in a unique form of cultural dialogue through a collaborative book project, offering readers an intimate glimpse into their shared historical moment. The work, published under the auspices of Velike priče, a long-running literary and intellectual platform based in Serbia, features correspondence between Goran Marković and Rajka Grlić, two veteran directors with contrasting political histories and artistic styles. Their exchanges, spanning nearly 18 months, capture the evolving landscape of Eastern European cinema and politics during a period marked by both personal reflection and broader societal change. The initiative was launched by editor Veljko Lalić, who encouraged the two longtime friends to engage in a series of letters through the Velike priče platform. The resulting book, released simultaneously in Belgrade and Zagreb, offers a dual narrative, one written by each filmmaker, yet deeply intertwined by the shared experiences and perspectives they bring to the table. The publication marks a rare convergence of two distinct cinematic voices, each shaped by their respective journeys through the tumultuous history of the region. Marković, born in 1947, has spent much of his career navigating the shifting political and cultural landscapes of Yugoslavia and its successor states. As a politically active figure, he became a target of repression under Slobodan Milošević’s regime, eventually being forced to resign from his academic position and curtail his filmmaking activities. In contrast, Grlić, born in 1953, left Croatia in 1991 after being pressured to flee the country, spending several years in exile before returning. His early career was similarly fraught, with films that often challenged the ideological norms of the time. Over the decades, both men have transitioned from figures of resistance within the socialist system to participants in the new national narratives that emerged after the collapse of Yugoslavia. Despite their divergent paths, Marković and Grlić share a deep commitment to cinema as an art form and a means of social commentary. Their letters reveal a mutual respect, tempered by a sense of irony and self-awareness. Marković, described as a depressive introvert, approaches his reflections with a critical eye, while Grlić, a more extroverted and humorous figure, injects levity into their conversations. Their dynamic reflects a broader tension between introspection and engagement, between the solitary act of creation and the public performance of identity. The book traces key moments in their lives, including the fall of the Yugoslav state apparatus, the rise of nationalist sentiments, and the global shifts brought about by the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent geopolitical realignments. It captures the emotional weight of living through these transitions, particularly for artists whose work has always been entangled with the political. Their correspondences offer insight into how individuals navigate the pressures of institutional change, whether through continued artistic output or through retreat into private reflection. As the book nears completion, it stands as a testament to the enduring power of dialogue, even when conducted across vast distances and changing political realities. The collaboration between Marković and Grlić exemplifies how personal stories can become part of a larger historical record, preserving the nuances of a rapidly evolving cultural and political environment. Their work invites readers to consider the ways in which individual agency intersects with collective memory, and how art continues to serve as both a mirror and a compass in times of uncertainty.

1 reports

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 907 days ago
The correspondence between two film classics and two outlaws within their home cultures is a reader's experience for those who share their epoch.

The article discusses a book titled 'Velike priče' which features correspondence between two Serbian filmmakers, Goran Marković and Rajko Grlić, who were both former dissidents under the Yugoslav socialist regime. The book explores their contrasting personalities and experiences, highlighting their different paths after the fall of socialism. Marković was expelled from his academic position and faced restrictions on filmmaking under President Aleksandar Vučić, while Grlić had to leave Croatia in 1991 and later returned to work in Serbia. The book serves as a reflection on their shared historical epoch and personal journeys.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the experiences of Marković and Grlić within the context of political dissent and repression under various regimes, emphasizing their struggles against authoritarianism. It portrays their artistic contributions as acts of resistance, aligning more closely with leftist values of批判性

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed background on the book 'Jesi li snimio ovo?' including its authors, Goran Marković and Rajko Grlić, their backgrounds as filmmakers and academics, and their political histories. It mentions the publication by Laguna and Telegram, and the editor Zoran Maljković. The info

Why objectivity (90): The tone is largely neutral and descriptive, focusing on the content and context of the book. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though the phrasing occasionally reflects admiration for the work and its creators without taking an explicit stance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories