Donald Trump je u srijedu, na tiskovnoj konferenciji na marginama samita skupine G7 u francuskome odmaralištu Evian-les-Bains, izrazio stalu povratnu liniju o napadu na školu za djevojčice u Iranu koji je nastupio 28. veljače. Prema informacijama koje su dostupne, američki predsjednik je rekao da "nitko nije namjerno" napao školu, što ukazuje na njegovu želju da osigura da se nekoliko ključnih aspekata događaja ne shvati kao direktna akcija Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Ova deklaracija dolazi nakon što je Reuters, novinski medij koji je prvi iznio detalje o događaju, izvijestio da je interna vojna istraga američke vojske pokazala da su snage SAD-a vjerojatno odgovorne za smrtonosan napad u Minabu na jugu Irana. Iako Pentagon nije potvrdio bilo kakve preliminarne nalaze, istraživanje je prošireno, ali još uvijek nije donijelo jasno zaključenje.
Napad je bio dio šireg sukoba između SAD-a i Iranu, koji je počeo nakon što su američke snage 8. februara 2020. udариše na iransku vojnu bazu u Bagdadu, ubijevši iranskog generala Qasem Soleimania. Reakcija Irana bila je brza – 28. veljače, američke snage su izvršile napad na Minab, grad u južnoj provinciji Hormuzdan, gdje je, prema iranskim dužnosnicima, ubijeno preko 175 djevojčica i nastavnika. Napad je bio izvršen tijekom prvog dana sukoba, što sugerira da je bio dio intenzivnog borbenog okreta između dvaju država.
Trump je u svojoj govoru naglasio da se u ratu griješi, što može biti interpretirano kao priznanje da su događaji poput ovog mogli nastati zbog pogrešnog razumijevanja situacije ili grešaka u logistici. Međutim, on je također izrazio duboko zabrinutost oko toga da bi bilo moguće da se dogodilo da se napad provodi namjerno, što je protivno njegovoj prethodnoj politici koja je izbjegavala priznanje zlačenja. Naime, Trump je u ranijim danima, bez dokaza, tvrdio da je Iran odgovoran za napad, što je izazvalo kritiku među međunarodnim strancima i unutar same američke vojske.
Istraživački proces nadalje je bio ozbiljan, a čelnik Središnjeg zapovjedništva američke vojske je prošlog mjeseca rekao da je istraga "zamršena" zbog toga što je škola bila blizu aktivne baze za iranske krstareće projektile. Ovo je dodatno komplikovalo utvrđivanje točne prirode napada, jer je bilo teško odrediti je li škola bila cilj ili je bila posljedična posledica promašenog udara. Arhivirane kopije internetske stranice škole pokazuju da je ustanova bila pored objekta kojim upravlja iranska Revolucionarna garda, jedan od najvažnijih granica iranske vojne strukture. Ovo je doprinijelo da se pojavi sumnja da je škola bila izložena rizičnom lokaciji, što je moglo dovesti do nesreće.
Reuters, prema upućenim izvorima, izvijestio je da su američki dužnosnici, prilikom pripreme ciljeva, koristili zastarjele obavještajne podatke. Ovo je moglo dovesti do pogrešnog ciljanja, što bi objašnjavao nesreću. Međutim, ova tvrdnja nije potvrđena ni jednim drugim izvorom, pa ostaje samo kao moguća hipoteza. Ovo je takođe izazvalo raspratu među analitičarima koji su pokušavali razumjeti kako je moguće da se takav događaj dogodio u modernoj vojnoj operaciji, posebno uz obzir da su američke snage imale pristup satelitskim sistemima i real-time podacima.
Reakcije na događaj bile su različite. Iranska vlada je izrazila ogroman žalost i optužbe prema SAD-u, a međunarodna zajednica je izrazila zabrinutost o tome da se u ratu ne treba koristiti civilne ciljeve. Međutim, Trump je, kao i prije, insistirao na tom da je istraga u tijeku i da će prihvatiti njene rezultate. Ovo je pokazalo da je njegovo stanje iznad svake države, iako je to moglo dovesti do daljnjeg izazivanja napetosti između SAD-a i Iranu. Neki analitičari smatraju da je Trumpov pristup, iako nekonzistentan, bio namjerni pokušaj da kontrolira medijsku percepciju i da održi visoku podršku svojoj politici.
4 reports
N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 93Objective 7016 days agoUS President Donald Trump stated that 'nobody intentionally' targeted an all-girls school in Iran in February, citing an investigation into the incident. The attack, which occurred on the first day of hostilities, killed over 175 girls and teachers according to Iranian officials. Reuters reported that an internal military investigation suggested US forces were likely responsible for the attack. The Pentagon has expanded its inquiry but has not confirmed any preliminary findings. Trump initially claimed Iran was responsible without evidence, later stating he does not know enough about the event
Bias read (Right): The article presents Trump's statements without critical evaluation, emphasizing his claims while providing limited context about the ongoing investigation. It frames Trump's remarks as definitive despite the lack of confirmed findings, potentially reinforcing his narrative.
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 70): The article presents the facts accurately, citing Reuters and quoting Trump's statements. It provides background information on the attack and the military investigation. The tone remains relatively neutral compared to the other articles, though it still focuses on Trump's comments.
Novi listIndependentRightFactual 92Objective 6816 days agoThe article discusses U.S. President Donald Trump's comments regarding the February attack on a girls' school in Iran, where over 175 students and teachers were killed. Trump stated that 'no one did it intentionally,' citing an ongoing military investigation. The article notes that Reuters first reported that a U.S. military inquiry suggested American forces might be responsible for the attack. The Pentagon has expanded the investigation but has not confirmed any preliminary findings. The school was located near an active Iranian missile base operated by the Revolutionary Guard.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Trump's statements without critical evaluation, emphasizing his claim that the attack was unintentional while noting the lack of confirmed findings from the Pentagon. It frames the situation through Trump’s perspective and does not provide balanced counterpoints or independent核实
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 68): This article closely mirrors the content of article 0, providing similar details about the investigation and Trump's remarks. It maintains a neutral tone overall but still emphasizes Trump's position more than counterpoints from other sources.
Telegram.hrIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 7516 days agoU.S. President Donald Trump stated that the bombing of a school for girls in Iran was unintentional, citing an ongoing military investigation. The attack occurred on February 28 during the first day of hostilities between the U.S. and Iran, killing over 175 girls and teachers according to Iranian officials. Trump initially claimed without evidence that Iran was responsible but later said he does not know enough about the attack and that the investigation is ongoing. The Pentagon has expanded the inquiry but has not confirmed any preliminary findings.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Trump’s statements with minimal contextualization or counter-narratives. It emphasizes Trump’s assertion that the attack was unintentional without providing direct rebuttals or alternative perspectives from other sources. The framing highlights Trump’s position while not equally
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports Trump's statements and references Reuters' report about the Pentagon investigation. It provides context about the attack and Trump's evolving position. However, it leans slightly toward presenting Trump's perspective without sufficient counterbalance.
tportalIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 6516 days agoUS President Donald Trump stated during a G7 summit press conference that the attack on a school for girls in Iran, which killed over 175 students and teachers, was not intentional, citing an ongoing military investigation. Reuters first reported that an internal US military inquiry suggested American forces might be responsible for the February attack in Minab, southern Iran. The Pentagon has expanded the investigation but has not confirmed any preliminary findings. Trump initially claimed Iran was responsible but later said he did not have enough information and would accept the results of a
Bias read (Right): The article presents Trump's statement that the attack was unintentional, without providing counterpoints or balancing perspectives from other sources. It emphasizes Trump's remarks while noting the lack of confirmed findings from the Pentagon, but does not present alternative viewpoints or evidence
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): The article accurately reports Trump's statements and the ongoing investigation by the US military. It cites Reuters as the first to report the findings. However, it leans slightly toward Trump's perspective by emphasizing his comments and using phrases like 'u ratu se griješi' which may imply justi
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
