ON
← Back to feed
by Sinnen about comedians: I wonder if Mr. Nuhr will keep his job
Germany🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives13 hr. ago

by Sinnen about comedians: I wonder if Mr. Nuhr will keep his job

Schauspielerin Hella von Sinnen kritisiert Komiker Dieter Nuhr für seine Äußerungen in einer ARD-Sendung, in der er die Zahl der Femizide in Deutschland minimiert hat. Von Sinnen beschreibt Nuhrs Kommentare als 'unfassbare Unverschämtheit' und fragt, ob er seinen Job bei der ARD behält. Nuhr hatte gesagt, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit, bei 300 bis 350 Femiziden pro Jahr auf einen Frauenmörder zu treffen, praktisch null sei, und fügte hinzu, dass es sicherer sei, den Partner vor dem Geschlechtsverkehr erst einmal kennenzulernen. Die Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik für 2024 meldete 308 tödliche Gewaltakte gegen Frauen, doch die genaue Zahl der Femizide bleibt schwierig zu bestimmen, da Gerichte diese Taten unterschiedlich bewerten. Eine Recherche der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung aus 2024 zeigte, dass einige Richter den Begriff 'Femizid' für rechtlich unbrauchbar halten, während andere die hohe Rate von Frauenmorden in Beziehungen betonen.

The documentary film „Was haben wir gelacht“, directed by Eva Müller and Isabel Schneider, offers a critical look back at German television humor from the 1990s, revealing how sexism permeated even the most seemingly lighthearted moments. The film features interviews with former comedians and performers who recall their experiences in a male-dominated industry, highlighting both the challenges they faced and the gradual shift toward more inclusive representation over time. The documentary begins with familiar tropes, interviewees seated in front of black backgrounds, recounting their memories of a bygone era. Many of them cite their mothers as early role models for female humor, reflecting a cultural norm that equated comedy with masculinity. Hella von Sinnen, one of the interviewees, recalls being treated disrespectfully during her early performances as “Putzfrau Schmitz” in Cologne’s carnival events. She describes how male audience members would often leave the venue to eat sausages while she performed, and some organizers refused to pay her because they believed women had no place in such settings. Von Sinnen calls this treatment “respectless,” emphasizing the lack of recognition for female comedic talent. Despite these early struggles, the 1990s marked a turning point. Female comedians such as Hella von Sinnen, Gaby Köster, Maren Kroymann, Esther Schweins, and Bettina Böttinger began to gain visibility, bringing fresh perspectives to the genre. Their presence challenged traditional norms, gradually reshaping the landscape of German television humor. However, the film makes clear that progress was far from complete. It reveals that many of the same patterns persisted, albeit in different forms. Müller and Schneider go beyond personal recollections by incorporating archival footage and other evidence. They juxtapose historical clips with contemporary commentary, creating a dynamic narrative that underscores the persistence of gender bias. One particularly striking sequence shows a segment from the late 1990s edition of the talk show „Nachtcafé“ featuring Wieland Backes. A man dressed in a jester’s costume attempts to explain why Hella von Sinnen should not perform in the carnival, suggesting that her presence was somehow inappropriate. This moment captures the lingering attitudes that shaped the industry long after the initial wave of change. The filmmakers also highlight the emotional toll of navigating a sexist environment. Many of the interviewees describe feeling isolated or dismissed, especially when trying to assert themselves in spaces dominated by men. Yet, despite these obstacles, they managed to carve out space for themselves, paving the way for future generations. The documentary does not shy away from the discomfort of these revelations, presenting them as part of a broader conversation about the evolution, and ongoing limitations, of media representation. By combining personal stories with historical context, „Was haben wir gelacht“ provides a nuanced portrait of a changing industry. It acknowledges the strides made toward inclusivity while also confronting the uncomfortable realities that still linger. The film serves as both a tribute to past pioneers and a call for continued reflection on the role of gender in shaping public discourse. Its raw honesty and layered storytelling make it a compelling contribution to the ongoing dialogue about equality in entertainment.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

taz – die tageszeitung logotaz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
You're providing evidence.

The documentary 'What Have We Laughed About?' by Eva Müller and Isabel Schneider explores the evolution of German television humor during the 1990s, focusing on the presence and challenges faced by women in comedy. The film highlights how sexism was pervasive in earlier decades, with male comedians dominating the scene and often objectifying female colleagues through sexist remarks. In the 1990s, women like Hella von Sinnen, Gaby Köster, and Maren Kroymann began breaking into the field, bringing new perspectives and challenging traditional norms. However, the film questions whether progress has truly been made, pointing out ongoing issues such as the problematic joke by Dieter Nuhr about femicide, which sparked controversy. Through interviews with comedians, the documentary reflects on both the struggles and achievements of women in stand-up comedy.

Bias read (Progressive): The article critiques the historical prevalence of sexism in German television humor and highlights the marginalization of women in the industry. It frames this issue within a broader social and cultural critique, emphasizing systemic gender inequality and questioning whether true progress has been

Why factuality (85): The article discusses a documentary film titled 'Was haben wir gelacht' by Eva Müller and Isabel Schneider, focusing on the German television humor of the 1990s and its sexist tendencies. It references specific examples like Dieter Nuhr’s joke about femicide and mentions historical figures from the

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans toward critical commentary on past media practices, particularly highlighting sexism. While informative, the language carries a somewhat judgmental undertone, especially when describing the historical context of male-dominated entertainment. This suggests a slight bias towards condemn

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒Progressive13 hr. ago
by Sinnen about comedians: I wonder if Mr. Nuhr will keep his job

Schauspielerin Hella von Sinnen kritisiert Komiker Dieter Nuhr für seine Äußerungen in einer ARD-Sendung, in der er die Zahl der Femizide in Deutschland minimiert hat. Von Sinnen beschreibt Nuhrs Kommentare als 'unfassbare Unverschämtheit' und fragt, ob er seinen Job bei der ARD behält. Nuhr hatte gesagt, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit, bei 300 bis 350 Femiziden pro Jahr auf einen Frauenmörder zu treffen, praktisch null sei, und fügte hinzu, dass es sicherer sei, den Partner vor dem Geschlechtsverkehr erst einmal kennenzulernen. Die Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik für 2024 meldete 308 tödliche Gewaltakte gegen Frauen, doch die genaue Zahl der Femizide bleibt schwierig zu bestimmen, da Gerichte diese Taten unterschiedlich bewerten. Eine Recherche der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung aus 2024 zeigte, dass einige Richter den Begriff 'Femizid' für rechtlich unbrauchbar halten, während andere die hohe Rate von Frauenmorden in Beziehungen betonen.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism of a comedian's remarks on femicides, highlighting concerns about gender-based violence and questioning the adequacy of legal frameworks. The tone emphasizes the seriousness of the issue and critiques the downplaying of femicides, aligning with a left-leaning focus on女

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories