DOJ asking secretive court to remove Afghan woman allegedly tied to terror plot

CBS News (US)IndependentConservative12 hr. ago

The U.S. Department of Justice is requesting the deportation of Nazira Haji Zada, a 47-year-old Afghan woman living in Fort Worth, Texas, through a specialized court known as the Alien Terrorist Removal Court. This is the first case ever brought before the court, which was established in 1996 to handle deportation cases involving classified national security information. Zada is accused of supporting her son and son-in-law, both of whom pleaded guilty to plotting a mass shooting during the 2024 U.S. election under the influence of ISIS. The FBI alleges that Zada pledged loyalty to ISIS and helped indoctrinate her children with extremist ideologies while concealing plans to relocate to ISIS-controlled territory. Unlike standard deportation processes, Zada cannot review the classified evidence against her or challenge the government’s methods of gathering it. The case highlights the secrecy and limited due process associated with these special removal proceedings.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the case as a national security threat, emphasizing the involvement of ISIS and the potential danger posed by Zada's actions. The language used ('alien terrorist,' 'mass casualty attack,' 'radicalize') carries a strong law-and-order tone. While the facts are presented neutrally, a

CBS News (US)IndependentConservativeyesterday

The U.S. Department of Justice has initiated the first-ever use of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, a rarely utilized federal immigration court established in 1996 to handle deportation cases involving classified national security information. The court allows for the deportation of noncitizens deemed 'alien terrorists' without public disclosure of evidence or the right to challenge the collection methods. The Justice Department filed a sealed application to remove an individual, which was initially reported by Court Watch. The application remained confidential until a court website launched, preventing public scrutiny during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. A federal judge has requested additional information, but the case remains shrouded in secrecy. Legal experts warn this sets a dangerous precedent, allowing detention based on secret evidence without due process.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the use of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court as a significant and controversial development, emphasizing the lack of transparency and due process. While it presents both the legal framework and concerns raised by experts, the emphasis on national security and the potential for det

Fox News (World)IndependentConservativeyesterday

An Iran expert has urged the UK government to close the Islamic Center of England, claiming it functions as an office of Iran's supreme leader and facilitates the smuggling of Iranian operatives into the UK. The claim follows reports that the center sponsors visas for imams under the guise of skilled workers, raising concerns about national security and immigration policies. The expert, Kasra Aarabi, accused the center of being an 'Islamist extremist infrastructure' and called for its immediate shutdown and deportation of non-British staff. This comes amid a broader context of alleged Iranian-linked activities in the UK, including reports of human trafficking routes controlled by Iranian officials and threats against British interests.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Islamic Center of England as a potential threat to national security, aligning with conservative narratives that view such organizations as extremist. It emphasizes the role of Iranian state actors and uses terms like 'Islamist extremist infrastructure' and 'revolutionary' to污

The HillIndependentConservative2 days ago

The article discusses the potential legal strategy involving a 'zombie court' that could be used to expedite the deportation of suspected terrorists. It suggests that if this approach is successful, it might transform the otherwise inactive court into a significant mechanism for removing foreign nationals accused of terrorism.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the potential use of a 'zombie court' as a tool for enhancing national security through more aggressive deportation policies. This aligns with conservative priorities regarding immigration control and homeland security, suggesting a right-leaning perspective on the issue.