ON
← Back to feed
Calling for the digital dependence of banks
GR🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

Calling for the digital dependence of banks

The article discusses growing concerns over digital vulnerabilities in Europe’s financial sector, highlighting a shift from traditional banking risks like insolvency to systemic threats posed by technological infrastructure. In 2025, the first year of tracking 'digital risks' under the DORA regulation, 3,383 serious incidents were recorded across the EU, averaging around 282 per month. These incidents primarily stem from internal system failures, external service disruptions, and operational inefficiencies, rather than cyberattacks. The report underscores the increasing reliance on third-party technology providers such as AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, raising concerns about the stability of the financial system. Regulators now emphasize the importance of digital resilience alongside cybersecurity.

Digital dependence has emerged as a significant concern for the banking sector across Europe, marking a shift in the primary risks faced by financial institutions. What once centered around the threat of bank bankruptcies now revolves around vulnerabilities within the digital infrastructure underpinning the continent's financial systems. This transformation highlights how reliance on technology—particularly cloud services and payment platforms—has introduced new layers of complexity and potential failure points into the financial ecosystem.

In 2025, the European financial landscape witnessed a substantial rise in incidents linked to digital operations. According to data compiled by the three European supervisory authorities, there were 3,383 serious incidents involving the technological and digital infrastructures of financial institutions throughout the year. This equates to approximately 282 incidents each month, underscoring the frequency and severity of these disruptions. These figures represent the first comprehensive pan-European assessment of such issues, conducted under the framework of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). DORA aims to establish a unified regulatory approach to ensure the digital operational resilience of the financial sector across Europe.

The focus of these incidents lies primarily in the technological infrastructure rather than external threats such as hacking attempts. While cyber-attacks remain a persistent issue, regulators have noted that financial institutions are increasingly encountering challenges stemming from internal technical malfunctions, system failures, and operational issues. The root cause of many of these incidents appears to be the complex interdependencies among various digital components used by banks, including third-party service providers and cloud computing platforms. When one element fails, it can trigger cascading effects that impact multiple institutions simultaneously.

The implications of this trend extend beyond individual banks, raising concerns about systemic risk within the broader financial system. A major disruption in a critical digital infrastructure—such as a cloud provider experiencing downtime or a central payment processing platform malfunctioning—could potentially affect numerous banks across Europe. This interconnectedness means that a single point of failure could ripple through the financial network, leading to widespread instability and economic repercussions.

Regulatory bodies are now tasked with addressing these emerging challenges. Under DORA, they are working to implement measures that enhance the resilience of financial institutions against digital risks. This includes requiring banks to conduct thorough assessments of their dependencies on third-party technologies and to develop robust contingency plans. Additionally, there is a growing emphasis on fostering collaboration between financial institutions and technology providers to improve overall system reliability and response capabilities during crises.

Looking ahead, experts anticipate continued scrutiny of digital infrastructure vulnerabilities as part of ongoing regulatory efforts. Financial institutions are being encouraged to invest in advanced monitoring tools and redundancy mechanisms to mitigate the likelihood and impact of system failures. As the reliance on digital platforms deepens, ensuring the stability and security of these systems will become even more crucial for maintaining trust and functionality within the banking sector.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

ekathimerini.com logoekathimerini.comIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 907 days ago
Digital dependance is the new risk for the banking sector

The article discusses growing concerns over digital dependencies within the European banking sector, highlighting how risks have shifted from traditional threats like bank bankruptcies to vulnerabilities in digital infrastructure. In 2025, under the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), 3,383 serious digital incidents were recorded across European financial institutions—approximately 282 per month. These incidents include technical malfunctions, system failures, and operational issues rather than cyberattacks. The European supervisory authorities are now focusing on ensuring the resilience of digital systems, recognizing that a failure in a cloud provider or payment platform could impact multiple banks simultaneously, creating a new form of systemic risk.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on digital risks in the financial sector without overtly favoring any political perspective. It focuses on regulatory efforts under DORA and highlights systemic risks without using loaded language or emphasizing one side over another.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Factual accuracy is high, aligning with cross-source consensus on DORA, digital risks, and the shift from bank failure to infrastructure concerns. The article presents data consistently with other sources. Objectivity is strong, though slightly less than perfect due to emphasis on 'new' risks.

Kathimerini logoKathimeriniIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 907 days ago
Calling for the digital dependence of banks

The article discusses growing concerns over digital vulnerabilities in Europe’s financial sector, highlighting a shift from traditional banking risks like insolvency to systemic threats posed by technological infrastructure. In 2025, the first year of tracking 'digital risks' under the DORA regulation, 3,383 serious incidents were recorded across the EU, averaging around 282 per month. These incidents primarily stem from internal system failures, external service disruptions, and operational inefficiencies, rather than cyberattacks. The report underscores the increasing reliance on third-party technology providers such as AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, raising concerns about the stability of the financial system. Regulators now emphasize the importance of digital resilience alongside cybersecurity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and regulatory findings without overt ideological slant. It reports on technical and operational challenges within the financial sector, focusing on risk management and regulatory responses. While the issue has political implications due to its impact on economic稳定性

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Factual content matches cross-source consensus on DORA, incident numbers, and causes. The Greek version maintains consistency with English sources. Objectivity is similar to the first article, with minor subjective phrasing like 'φόβος' which adds slight emotional weight.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories