ON
← Back to feed
Differences emerge between TDB president, Devaswom min over Sabarimala Onam sadya
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/3/2026

Differences emerge between TDB president, Devaswom min over Sabarimala Onam sadya

Conflicting accounts have emerged regarding the serving of Onam sadya during the Sabarimala festival, with differing claims between the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) president K Jayakumar and Devaswom Minister K Muraleedharan. Jayakumar asserts that sadya was served to approximately 3,000 people, denying reports that devotees were given pulao instead. Muraleedharan counters that only pulao was provided to devotees, while officials received sadya, citing photographs and questioning the disruption of longstanding traditions. Both parties emphasize their positions, with Jayakumar attributing discrepancies to misinformation and Muraleedharan stressing adherence to established customs.

Thiruvananthapuram, Sept 13 Differences have surfaced between Travancore Devaswom Board president K Jayakumar and Devaswom Minister K Muraleedharan regarding the serving of Onam sadya to devotees at Sabarimala. Reports suggest that during the three-day Onam celebration, some devotees were served pulao instead of the traditional sadya. Jayakumar denied these claims, stating that sadya was served to approximately 3,000 individuals. Muraleedharan countered by asserting that only pulao was offered to devotees, while officials received sadya. Jayakumar told reporters that describing the situation as a major failure was inaccurate. “It is incorrect to label this as an incident involving a significant failure,” he stated. “Many have misinterpreted the situation. We can clarify the details.” He added that the police did not prepare the sadya as they typically do, since their participation is voluntary. “We could not compel them to act,” he explained. When confronted with Muraleedharan’s remarks, Jayakumar noted that the minister had been informed by multiple individuals, including those who shared photographs. Muraleedharan argued that altering long-standing traditions was inappropriate. “Why disrupt a practice observed for years?” he questioned. “The Devaswom Board may claim otherwise, but that was not how it transpired.” He highlighted that sadya was limited to specific days and criticized the presentation of certain dishes as misleading. “They showed me images of yellow curry mixed with rice, claiming it was ‘pulao,’” he said. “Is that how an Onam sadya should be prepared?” Muraleedharan emphasized the importance of adhering to established customs. “The sadya on Uthradam, Thiruvonam, and Avittom days has always been customary. What was achieved by halting it?” he concluded. “Our stance is that the Devaswom Board must rectify this.”

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 609/3/2026
Differences emerge between TDB president, Devaswom min over Sabarimala Onam sadya

Conflicting accounts have emerged regarding the serving of Onam sadya during the Sabarimala festival, with differing claims between the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) president K Jayakumar and Devaswom Minister K Muraleedharan. Jayakumar asserts that sadya was served to approximately 3,000 people, denying reports that devotees were given pulao instead. Muraleedharan counters that only pulao was provided to devotees, while officials received sadya, citing photographs and questioning the disruption of longstanding traditions. Both parties emphasize their positions, with Jayakumar attributing discrepancies to misinformation and Muraleedharan stressing adherence to established customs.

Bias read (Center): The article presents conflicting perspectives from both the TDB president and the minister without overtly endorsing either side. While there is some emphasis on tradition and governance, the framing remains balanced, presenting both claims without clear ideological leaning. Neither side is clearly贬

Why factuality (65): The article reports conflicting accounts from both the TDB president and the Devaswom minister regarding the type of food served during Onam sadya at Sabarimala. While it presents both perspectives, there is no clear resolution or verification of either claim. The article mentions that Jayakumar den

Why objectivity (60): The tone remains neutral, presenting both sides of the disagreement without overt bias. However, the language carries some emotional weight when Jayakumar refers to 'misled many' and describes the situation as 'contrary to truth.' This suggests a slight editorial lean towards defending the TDB presi

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 459/3/2026
Differences emerge between TDB president, Devaswom min over Sabarimala Onam sadya

The article reports on emerging differences between the President of the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) and the Kerala Deputy Chief Minister regarding the management and preparation of the Sabarimala Onam sadya, a significant religious offering during the annual festival. The disagreement appears to center around administrative responsibilities and cultural practices associated with the event. The situation highlights potential tensions within the state government concerning religious traditions and their governance. No specific details about the nature of the dispute or resolution efforts are provided.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a disagreement between two officials without overtly favoring either side. It does not include strong ideological language or emphasize particular viewpoints beyond the stated conflict. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the emergence of differences in官

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (45): Given the brevity and lack of content, it is challenging to assess objectivity. However, the absence of any apparent bias or loaded language suggests a relatively neutral approach, albeit with very little substance to analyze.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories