ON
← Back to feed
Diana's brother insists he's 'telling truth' about King
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive

Diana's brother insists he's 'telling truth' about King

Charles Spencer, the brother of Princess Diana, has reiterated his claims that King Charles III told him shortly after Diana's death in 1997 that the royal family would 'forget her soon enough.' These allegations appear in Spencer's new memoir, which includes detailed accounts of conversations with Prince Charles during this time. Spencer described the king's remarks as 'monstrous' and recounted a heated phone call in which the king criticized Spencer's family for their sense of duty. The claims have sparked controversy, with Buckingham Palace responding that the king's reaction was due to 'fraternal grief.' Spencer emphasized that he shared these claims with close friends and family immediately and insists they are true. Other parts of the memoir include claims that Diana suspected her husband was in love with his valet and that Queen Elizabeth II once considered reinstating her title.

Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, has reiterated his claims that King Charles made disparaging remarks about his late sister shortly after her death, insisting he is "telling the truth." According to a recent BBC interview, Spencer described the alleged comments as "monstrous," claiming the then Prince Charles told him, "rest assured, we'll forget her soon enough," during a heated conversation. This assertion comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the royal family's public response to the allegations. Spencer, whose memoir Swan Song: Diana, My Sister is being serialised in the Daily Mail, detailed the emotional toll of the encounter. He recalled the moment with vivid clarity, stating that the King "went ballistic" and launched a verbal attack on his family, focusing on their perceived lack of duty. After a prolonged exchange, the King reportedly calmed down and delivered the controversial remark. Spencer, taken aback, responded with disbelief and ended the call. Buckingham Palace swiftly responded to the claims, issuing a statement that acknowledged the potential impact of "fraternal grief" on memory and judgment. The palace emphasized that it does not comment on books but noted that the King was aware of the possibility that emotions might influence recollections. Despite this, Spencer maintained that his account was accurate, asserting that the exact words were spoken by the King. In the same interview, Spencer expressed skepticism about the palace's stance, questioning whether the King was "furious" or "embarrassed" by the remarks. He highlighted that he had only had two conversations with Prince Charles throughout his life and was fully attentive during the call. "Those are exactly the words he said," he stated, vowing to the BBC that his version of events was truthful. Spencer also shared additional insights from the memoir, including his concerns for Prince Harry during the funeral. He described the young boy as "too small to be doing this" and noted the lack of apparent care extended to him. During the train ride from London to Althorp following the funeral, Spencer focused on Harry's emotional state, believing he required comfort that was not provided. Other revelations from the memoir include claims that Queen Elizabeth II once offered to restore Diana's title of "Her Royal Highness" after her divorce from Prince Charles. This suggestion came through a conversation with the late queen's private secretary, Robert Fellowes. Spencer found the proposal "very kind" but ultimately dismissed its significance, noting Diana's passing rendered the gesture moot. Spencer also recounted the Queen's reaction upon hearing initial news of Diana's accident, describing her as "tetchily" inquiring about Diana's activities. These accounts add layers to the narrative surrounding the royal family's handling of Diana's legacy and personal relationships. Meanwhile, the royal family continues to engage publicly. King Charles recently presided over a gathering of global AI leaders, warning of the "existential dangers" associated with the misuse of emerging technologies. The Prince and Princess of Wales visited the Isle of Bute, participating in local events and engaging with residents. Meanwhile, the Princess Royal attended an opening ceremony at a historical center in Staffordshire, while the Duchess of Edinburgh continued her tour in Zambia. The Duke of Sussex, who has been officially removed from active royal duties, made his first public appearance since returning to the UK at the inaugural Invictus Spirit Awards in London. His involvement includes a planned school visit and the launch of an educational initiative tied to the upcoming Invictus Games in Birmingham. In London, Sotheby's is set to host a media call for the first public display of Diana's iconic black silk "revenge dress" since 1997. The garment, worn by Diana during a confrontation with paparazzi, has become a symbol of her resilience and public persona. These developments underscore the ongoing relevance of Diana's legacy within both the royal family and broader cultural discourse. As the memoir continues to unfold, the public awaits further details on the nature of the relationship between the royal family and the wider public, especially in light of the controversies and disclosures surrounding Diana's life and death.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 70
Diana's brother insists he's 'telling truth' about King

Charles Spencer, the brother of Princess Diana, has reiterated his claims that King Charles III told him shortly after Diana's death in 1997 that the royal family would 'forget her soon enough.' These allegations appear in Spencer's new memoir, which includes detailed accounts of conversations with Prince Charles during this time. Spencer described the king's remarks as 'monstrous' and recounted a heated phone call in which the king criticized Spencer's family for their sense of duty. The claims have sparked controversy, with Buckingham Palace responding that the king's reaction was due to 'fraternal grief.' Spencer emphasized that he shared these claims with close friends and family immediately and insists they are true. Other parts of the memoir include claims that Diana suspected her husband was in love with his valet and that Queen Elizabeth II once considered reinstating her title.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Charles Spencer's claims directly without overtly favoring either side. It quotes Spencer's statements and includes the official response from Buckingham Palace, providing both perspectives without apparent bias. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the content of the claims

Why factuality (85): The article reports claims made by Charles Spencer in his memoir, which are presented as allegations. It references the memoir's serialization in the Daily Mail and mentions the BBC interview. While there is no primary source document, the claims align with public knowledge of the dispute between Sp

Why objectivity (70): The article presents Spencer's account as emotionally charged, using phrases like 'monstrous' and 'giddily elated.' It also includes quotes from Spencer expressing shock and disbelief, which may reflect the emotional tone of the narrative rather than presenting a neutral perspective. The article fra

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 65
Princess Diana's brother doubles down on claims about King Charles

Earl Spencer, brother of Princess Diana, has reiterated claims that King Charles III said 'we'll forget her soon enough' shortly after Diana's death in 1997. In a new memoir, Spencer describes a heated argument with the king over funeral arrangements for Diana, where he alleges the monarch made the controversial remark. The claim has drawn an 'unprecedented' response from Buckingham Palace, which warned that 'the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason.' Spencer recounted the emotional turmoil of the funeral, expressing concerns about the treatment of his nephew Prince Harry, who was 12 years old at the time. He described the king's behavior as erratic and emphasized that he shared his account with close family members immediately upon learning of the remarks.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against King Charles III using emotionally charged language ('monstrous,' 'went ballistic,' 'lack of obvious care') and emphasizes the personal trauma experienced by the royal family. While the subject involves royalty, the framing leans left by highlighting the 'g

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports Earl Spencer's claims about King Charles III saying 'we'll forget her soon enough' regarding Diana. However, these are allegations from Spencer's memoir and not confirmed by any independent evidence. The article does not explicitly state that these claims are unverifie

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the claims in a somewhat biased manner, using terms like 'damning claims' and describing the king's comments as 'monstrous.' While it includes quotes from both Spencer and Buckingham Palace, the overall tone leans toward emphasizing Spencer's perspective without providing equal

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories