On the site of the Chemistry Institute in Ljubljana, more than 20 meters of reinforced concrete diaphragm was constructed before the building permit for the new facility had been issued. Although the project documentation describes this structure as temporary and part of the demolition phase, it was originally planned to protect the excavation during the construction of the new object. The Building Inspection received a report in December, but their response does not clarify whether they have already assessed whether the diaphragm was legally justified within the scope of demolition work. The Chemistry Institute began preparatory works for the construction of the Centre for Gene and Cell Therapy Technologies (CTGCT) last December, which aims to develop advanced therapies for cancer, rare genetic diseases, and immune system disorders. The project is funded by European and national funds, including €15 million from the European Commission and another €15 million from the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation. The new building will replace the former Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology building on Hajdrihova Street. The first phase involved relocating utility线路
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about construction activities at the Chemistry Institute and the legal status of the diaphragm construction. It includes both the concerns raised by the situation and the responses from the Building Inspection without overtly favoring any side. There is no明显的
Why factuality (75): The article provides factual information about the construction of a diaphragm at the Chemistry Institute before a building permit was issued. It mentions the project's purpose, funding sources, and the phase of work completed. While there is some ambiguity regarding the building inspection's assess
Why objectivity (68): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards promoting the significance of the new research center. Phrases like 'pospešil razvoj personaliziranih terapij' suggest a positive outlook on the project's impact, which may reflect institutional priorities rather than purely objective reporting.



