ON
← Back to feed
Dhoni’s ₹100-crore defamation suit: Madras High Court directs Registry to number retired IPS officer’s plea
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Dhoni’s ₹100-crore defamation suit: Madras High Court directs Registry to number retired IPS officer’s plea

The Madras High Court has directed its Registry to assign numbers to three legal applications filed by retired IPS officer G. Sampath Kumar, who seeks to video record cricketer M.S. Dhoni's testimony in a ₹100-crore defamation lawsuit Dhoni initiated in 2014. The applications aim to ensure the recording process involves a judicial officer, occurs in a secure location like a court or government building, and produces unedited video records. The court will allow Dhoni to submit a counter affidavit once the applications are processed. The case involves multiple defendants including Zee Media Corporation, journalist Sudhir Chaudhary, and News Nation Network. Earlier, a single judge had appointed an advocate commissioner to record Dhoni's evidence, which was upheld by a Division Bench despite Kumar's challenge.

1 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Dhoni’s ₹100-crore defamation suit: Madras High Court directs Registry to number retired IPS officer’s plea

The Madras High Court has directed its Registry to assign numbers to three legal applications filed by retired IPS officer G. Sampath Kumar, who seeks to video record cricketer M.S. Dhoni's testimony in a ₹100-crore defamation lawsuit Dhoni initiated in 2014. The applications aim to ensure the recording process involves a judicial officer, occurs in a secure location like a court or government building, and produces unedited video records. The court will allow Dhoni to submit a counter affidavit once the applications are processed. The case involves multiple defendants including Zee Media Corporation, journalist Sudhir Chaudhary, and News Nation Network. Earlier, a single judge had appointed an advocate commissioner to record Dhoni's evidence, which was upheld by a Division Bench despite Kumar's challenge.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings objectively, focusing on procedural aspects of the court's handling of the defamation case. It does not take a clear ideological stance on either the plaintiff (Dhoni) or defendant (Kumar), nor does it emphasize particular political narratives. The framing,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories