ON
← Back to feed
Det ble kraftige reaksjoner da han skrev om svartmaling og manipulering av eksen. Nå svarer psykologen.
NO🏛️ Politics20 hr. ago

Det ble kraftige reaksjoner da han skrev om svartmaling og manipulering av eksen. Nå svarer psykologen.

The article discusses reactions to a previous column by Frode Thuen, a psychology professor, which addressed the issue of parents being excluded from contact with their children after a breakup, particularly in cases where one parent allegedly 'blackmails' or manipulates the child against the other. The piece highlights both supportive responses from parents who feel understood and criticisms arguing that the column oversimplifies a complex situation. A female reader is mentioned as having expressed criticism, though the full letter remains behind a subscription wall.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Aftenposten logoAftenpostenIndependent🔒Center20 hr. ago
Det ble kraftige reaksjoner da han skrev om svartmaling og manipulering av eksen. Nå svarer psykologen.

The article discusses reactions to a previous column by Frode Thuen, a psychology professor, which addressed the issue of parents being excluded from contact with their children after a breakup, particularly in cases where one parent allegedly 'blackmails' or manipulates the child against the other. The piece highlights both supportive responses from parents who feel understood and criticisms arguing that the column oversimplifies a complex situation. A female reader is mentioned as having expressed criticism, though the full letter remains behind a subscription wall.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the controversy surrounding the column, acknowledging both positive and critical responses. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on the differing perspectives of those involved. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the debate over

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories