ON
← Back to feed
Despite years of confiscations, the Met still holds hundreds of pieces linked to alleged trafficking and looting figures
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

Despite years of confiscations, the Met still holds hundreds of pieces linked to alleged trafficking and looting figures

Despite the seizure of over $95 million worth of antiquities from New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art (Met), the museum continues to hold hundreds of additional items linked to individuals accused of trafficking and looting cultural artifacts. A report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) reveals that many of these items were acquired from collectors connected to known traffickers such as Subhash Kapoor and Robert E. Hecht. The Met has acknowledged the issue and stated it is conducting extensive research into its collection to identify and address any potentially illicitly obtained items. However, the museum still retains pieces once owned by figures like Douglas Latchford, who was implicated in the looting of Cambodia’s cultural heritage. The Met has emphasized its commitment to ensuring its collection does not include stolen art and has undertaken significant efforts to trace the origins of its artifacts.

Despite years of confiscations, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York continues to hold hundreds of artworks linked to individuals accused of trafficking and looting cultural treasures. A new analysis by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalism reveals that even after authorities seized over $95 million worth of antiquities from the museum in recent years, the institution still retains numerous items connected to alleged criminals in the global art trade. The confiscated works primarily originated from a select group of collectors known to be associated with smuggling networks that targeted historical sites ranging from Rome to rural Cambodia. Previous investigations by the ICIJ uncovered more than a thousand pieces in the Met's collection tied to individuals who faced indictment or conviction for antiquities-related offenses. Among them were Subhash Kapoor, described by U.S. authorities as one of the world’s leading commodity smugglers, and Robert E. Hecht, who was charged by Italian authorities with trafficking. The latest findings indicate that the Met still possesses hundreds of objects previously owned by the same individuals responsible for many of the recently seized items. This includes Hecht, Kapoor, and others implicated in illicit activities. Kapoor was arrested in Germany in 2011 and later convicted in India for trafficking crimes. Hecht denied involvement in the illegal export of art and passed away in 2012. In response to inquiries from the ICIJ, the Met stated it has initiated and accelerated research into several hundred works associated with specific dealers as part of a wider examination of its collection. The museum emphasized its object-by-object approach to the investigation and highlighted two pieces linked to Hecht that possess thorough documentation of their origins. Lucian Simmons, the museum’s head of provenance research, confirmed in an email that the Met does not wish to have any stolen artwork within its walls. He noted that the institution has invested considerable resources into researching the provenance of its holdings and has shared these findings globally. These efforts have led to the return of objects to various nations. The Met, which houses over 1.5 million objects, is the largest museum in North America. Its annual Met Gala attracts high-profile guests such as billionaires and celebrities. For much of its history, the museum adopted a relatively lenient attitude towards the origins of its acquisitions, according to prior reports by the ICIJ. In March 2023, the ICIJ and Finance Uncovered disclosed that the Met held more than 1,100 pieces previously owned by collectors who had been either indicted or convicted of antiquities crimes. The analysis found that less than half of these items had detailed records explaining how they left their countries of origin, particularly from regions with stringent export regulations. Following the publication of that report, the Met announced the formation of a dedicated team of investigators to collaborate with curators, conservators, and other researchers to enhance the examination of its collection. This marks the largest such team at any museum. However, the New York Times reported in June that government investigators have expressed frustration with the progress made in reviewing the museum’s collection. Advocacy groups argue that the Met, as a leader in the field, could adopt a more proactive stance regarding artifacts connected to trafficking. Tess Davis, executive director of the Antiquities Coalition, remarked that the museum seems to be awaiting legal action from U.S. prosecutors or foreign governments with conclusive evidence. She suggested that the focus should be on whether these objects should remain in one of the world’s premier museums rather than solely on meeting the highest legal standard.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

ICIJ logoICIJIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 783 days ago
Despite years of confiscations, the Met still holds hundreds of pieces linked to alleged trafficking and looting figures

Despite the seizure of over $95 million worth of antiquities from New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art (Met), the museum continues to hold hundreds of additional items linked to individuals accused of trafficking and looting cultural artifacts. A report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) reveals that many of these items were acquired from collectors connected to known traffickers such as Subhash Kapoor and Robert E. Hecht. The Met has acknowledged the issue and stated it is conducting extensive research into its collection to identify and address any potentially illicitly obtained items. However, the museum still retains pieces once owned by figures like Douglas Latchford, who was implicated in the looting of Cambodia’s cultural heritage. The Met has emphasized its commitment to ensuring its collection does not include stolen art and has undertaken significant efforts to trace the origins of its artifacts.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the Met's holdings and responses to allegations of possessing looted artifacts. It cites specific examples and quotes from the Met, providing balanced coverage without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the findings of I

Why factuality (85): The article cites a report by the ICIJ and provides specific names of individuals involved in antiquities trafficking, including Subhash Kapoor and Robert E. Hecht. It references legal actions taken against these individuals and mentions the Met's response to the findings. While no primary source do

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the findings of the ICIJ analysis but also includes quotes from the Met's representative, which adds a balanced perspective. However, there is some emphasis on the controversy surrounding the Met's acquisitions and the legal status of the individuals involved, which may slightly

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories