ON
← Back to feed
Deselected candidate claims Lib Dems’ religious discrimination cost him £790,000
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 days ago

Deselected candidate claims Lib Dems’ religious discrimination cost him £790,000

A former Liberal Democrat candidate, David Campanale, is suing the party for alleged religious discrimination, claiming it cost him £790,000 in lost income and opportunities. The case centers on Campanale's removal as the party's candidate for Sutton and Cheam in 2023, following allegations of mockery and exclusion due to his Christian beliefs. The Liberal Democrats admit to breaches of the Equality Act but argue the claim is 'grossly inflated,' offering only £14,000 for emotional distress. Campanale's claim includes lost earnings, pension, counseling costs, and 'loss of political capital.' His replacement, Luke Taylor, won the seat, and the area has since become more favorable for the Lib Dems. Senior party members and religious leaders have criticized the handling of the case, calling for an independent inquiry.

David Campanale, a former BBC journalist and former Liberal Democrat candidate, has filed a civil lawsuit against the party, claiming that religious discrimination cost him £788,740.75 in losses. The case is currently before the Central London County Court, where both parties have presented conflicting estimates of the financial impact of the alleged discrimination. Campanale was selected as the Liberal Democrats' candidate for Sutton and Cheam in 2021 but was deselected in August 2023. His claim alleges that the party discriminated against him on grounds of religion or belief, violating the Equality Act. According to Campanale's schedule of loss, the total includes injury to feelings, aggravated damages, lost earnings, the loss of an MP’s pension, counselling costs, and the “loss of a chance,” or “loss of political capital.” The figure includes interest and totals £788,740.75. In response, the Liberal Democrats submitted a counter-schedule, describing Campanale’s claim as “grossly inflated and egregious.” Their legal team argues that £14,000 should be awarded for injury to feelings, and they assert that as a volunteer political party member, Campanale should have been prepared to endure “rigorous political debate and criticism.” They put aggravated damages, past and future loss of earnings, an MP’s pension, and the loss of political capital at £0. Campanale alleges that he was subjected to mockery and abuse due to his Christian beliefs and faced an organized campaign to remove him from the candidacy. At a meeting in January 2022, he claims he was questioned about his Christianity by around 30 individuals, who asked whether he was enjoying his “martyrdom just like Jesus did.” He also asserts that he was excluded from election leaflets and instructed not to campaign in certain wards due to disagreement among activists regarding his beliefs. In a phone call in March 2022, Campanale claims that his replacement, Luke Taylor, informed him that he had no right to a conscience based on his faith and that a “secular party” was being built with no place for Christians. After Campanale was removed, Taylor won the seat with a majority of 3,801. The constituency has since become more secure for the Liberal Democrats, with recent polling indicating the party is well ahead of the Conservatives. The case has drawn criticism from within and beyond the Liberal Democrats. Former leader Tim Farron and former deputy leader Simon Hughes have called for an independent inquiry into the allegations. Farron has urged the party to issue an apology, stating that there was “manifest discrimination” against Campanale and that party figures at all levels failed to intervene. Former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams has expressed concern over the party’s stance, warning that it could make it “impossible” for Christians and others with strong religious beliefs to represent the party. Before admitting the claims, the Liberal Democrats stated that they could deselect candidates whose expressions of religious beliefs conflicted with the party’s policies or values. They also noted that the era associated with prominent Christian Liberal Democrats such as Shirley Williams and Charles Kennedy was over. A Lib Dem spokesperson commented prior to the submission of the counter-schedule, noting that the case is ongoing and thus comments would not be appropriate. The spokesperson emphasized that the party welcomes members of all faiths and none, including many Christians. They pointed out that three Liberal Democrat MPs in neighboring constituations to Sutton and Cheam are practicing Christians, including party leader Ed Davey.

1 reports

The Guardian (UK) logoThe Guardian (UK)IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
Deselected candidate claims Lib Dems’ religious discrimination cost him £790,000

A former Liberal Democrat candidate, David Campanale, is suing the party for alleged religious discrimination, claiming it cost him £790,000 in lost income and opportunities. The case centers on Campanale's removal as the party's candidate for Sutton and Cheam in 2023, following allegations of mockery and exclusion due to his Christian beliefs. The Liberal Democrats admit to breaches of the Equality Act but argue the claim is 'grossly inflated,' offering only £14,000 for emotional distress. Campanale's claim includes lost earnings, pension, counseling costs, and 'loss of political capital.' His replacement, Luke Taylor, won the seat, and the area has since become more favorable for the Lib Dems. Senior party members and religious leaders have criticized the handling of the case, calling for an independent inquiry.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the dispute as a clear case of religious discrimination, emphasizing the personal and professional harm suffered by Campanale. While the Liberal Democrats acknowledge wrongdoing, they dismiss the claim as exaggerated, which the article portrays as a defensive stance rather than a誠

Why factuality (85): The article presents the details of the legal dispute between David Campanale and the Liberal Democrats, citing both parties' positions. It references the claim amounts, the admission of discrimination by the party, and the specific allegations from Campanale. While no primary source is available, t

Why objectivity (70): The article frames the dispute as a conflict between Campanale and the Liberal Democrats, presenting both sides but giving more detailed coverage of Campanale's claims. There is some emotional language around the impact of discrimination, but overall the tone remains journalistic. The article does n

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories