ON
← Back to feed
Denial of justice for those refused bail, says High Court
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 hr. ago

Denial of justice for those refused bail, says High Court

The High Court in Ireland has ruled that individuals denied bail in the District Court due to the absence of legal representation during a solicitors' dispute experienced a 'fundamental denial of justice.' The ruling applies to 11 out of 21 cases reviewed, where applicants successfully argued for their immediate release after being initially refused bail. The court emphasized the right to liberty and the need for remedies in such situations, stating that the issue was not about the legal aid system itself but the individual treatment of each case. Many of these individuals later obtained bail through the High Court, challenging the legality of their initial detention via Article 40 applications. The State’s legal representatives previously contended that proceeding without legal counsel was lawful and that systemic issues required separate resolution. Additional Article 40 cases remain pending, and the full judgment will be published soon.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenter8 hr. ago
Denial of justice for those refused bail, says High Court

The High Court in Ireland has ruled that individuals denied bail in the District Court due to the absence of legal representation during a solicitors' dispute experienced a 'fundamental denial of justice.' The ruling applies to 11 out of 21 cases reviewed, where applicants successfully argued for their immediate release after being initially refused bail. The court emphasized the right to liberty and the need for remedies in such situations, stating that the issue was not about the legal aid system itself but the individual treatment of each case. Many of these individuals later obtained bail through the High Court, challenging the legality of their initial detention via Article 40 applications. The State’s legal representatives previously contended that proceeding without legal counsel was lawful and that systemic issues required separate resolution. Additional Article 40 cases remain pending, and the full judgment will be published soon.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's ruling neutrally, emphasizing the judicial perspective without overtly favoring either the applicants or the state. It includes both the court's findings and the opposing arguments from the State's legal team, providing balanced coverage of the legal debate.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories