ON
← Back to feed
Sojar: The City of Ljubljana's authorities have lost touch with the people
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative

Sojar: The City of Ljubljana's authorities have lost touch with the people

Ahead of the 2026 local elections in Ljubljana, Mojca Sojar, the joint candidate for mayor from the National Movement (NSi) and Focus parties, opened an election cafe to engage directly with residents. She argued that the current city administration has lost touch with citizens and criticized the management of municipal projects, specifically noting a tendency to start with low budgets that are later increased through numerous addenda. NSi leader Jernej Vrto reinforced this critique by stating that Ljubljana has lost its human face and become too focused on concrete, skyscrapers, and tourism rather than serving as a spiritual center for Slovenia. He emphasized the need to develop district communities outside the ring road, referring to them as part of Ljubljana's countryside. Former independence government president Lojze Peterle was highlighted as a prominent figure on their candidate list, adding weight to their campaign. Peterle joked that he supported Sojar’s candidacy partly because she promised to change the parking regime, which he described as exploitative.

2 reports

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 40
Democracy has to be stopped at some point.

The article opens by questioning whether Slovenia is currently experiencing a golden age or a severe crisis of local democracy while observing upcoming local elections. It notes that these elections serve as a major civic event where citizens elect over 212 mayors, 3,382 municipal council members, and approximately 7,000 representatives for local and district communities. The piece highlights the scale of participation required, citing more than 600 candidates for mayor and over 16,000 candidates for municipal councils, alongside thousands more running for smaller community boards. However, the provided text is truncated behind a paywall, limiting the available information to this introductory overview of the electoral landscape.

Bias read (Center): The visible portion of the text presents a balanced, rhetorical question regarding the state of local democracy without taking a definitive stance. It provides statistical context on the number of candidates and positions but does not exhibit clear ideological slant, loaded language, or one-sidedly.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (40): The tone is highly opinionated and provocative. The title 'We must stop democracy at some point' is an extreme rhetorical device that signals strong bias. The opening sentence frames the situation as a crisis or golden age, inviting the reader into a subjective debate rather than presenting neutral

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicConservative
Sojar: The City of Ljubljana's authorities have lost touch with the people

Ahead of the 2026 local elections in Ljubljana, Mojca Sojar, the joint candidate for mayor from the National Movement (NSi) and Focus parties, opened an election cafe to engage directly with residents. She argued that the current city administration has lost touch with citizens and criticized the management of municipal projects, specifically noting a tendency to start with low budgets that are later increased through numerous addenda. NSi leader Jernej Vrto reinforced this critique by stating that Ljubljana has lost its human face and become too focused on concrete, skyscrapers, and tourism rather than serving as a spiritual center for Slovenia. He emphasized the need to develop district communities outside the ring road, referring to them as part of Ljubljana's countryside. Former independence government president Lojze Peterle was highlighted as a prominent figure on their candidate list, adding weight to their campaign. Peterle joked that he supported Sojar’s candidacy partly because she promised to change the parking regime, which he described as exploitative.

Bias read (Conservative): The article exclusively features quotes from opposition candidates criticizing the incumbent administration, using loaded terms like 'exploitative' and 'lost contact,' while omitting any perspective from the ruling coalition.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories