ON
← Back to feed
Netflix sued over the disappearance of a Nicolas Cage film
MX🎭 Cultureyesterday

Netflix sued over the disappearance of a Nicolas Cage film

A film producer has sued Netflix over the disappearance of a World War II movie starring Nicolas Cage titled 'Fortitude.' The lawsuit was filed by writer and producer Simon Afram in a federal court in California, alleging that Netflix lost an unencrypted copy of the film stored on a hard drive. The movie was delivered to Netflix in mid-June for screening and purchase, but shortly after, Netflix informed the producers that several hard drives had been stolen from their Los Angeles offices, including 'Fortitude.' Afram claims he invested over $45 million into the production, which took seven years to complete and was in the process of being sold to distributors. Netflix responded by stating it would not take responsibility for the loss of a film distributed without standard industry security measures.

Simon Afram, a film producer and screenwriter, has filed a lawsuit against Netflix over the disappearance of a World War II movie starring Nicolas Cage titled Fortitude. The legal action was submitted last Wednesday before a federal court in California, alleging that Netflix lost an unencrypted hard drive containing the film after it was handed over to the streaming giant’s headquarters in Hollywood. According to the complaint, the movie was delivered to Netflix in mid-June for screening and potential purchase. A few days later, Netflix reportedly sent an email to the plaintiffs informing them of the theft of “a significant number” of hard drives from its offices in Los Angeles, including Fortitude. Afram claims that Netflix refused to disclose whether it had reported the incident to authorities or sought assistance from security agencies to recover the footage. Afram alleges he invested more than $45 million into the production of Fortitude, which took seven years to complete and was in the process of being sold to distributors. He is seeking compensation of at least $105 million, according to the filing. The lawsuit highlights concerns over the handling of physical media by major studios and raises questions about the adequacy of security measures used during the transfer and storage of high-value content. Netflix responded to the allegations through a spokesperson who stated in a statement shared by Deadline that the company would not accept responsibility for the loss of a film distributed without adhering to standard industry security protocols. The statement did not confirm or deny whether the hard drive was ever reported to law enforcement or if any recovery efforts were undertaken. The case centers around the physical delivery of the film, which was reportedly handed over to Netflix in June. While the company acknowledged the theft of multiple hard drives, it did not specify whether Fortitude was among them or how it was handled internally. The lack of transparency regarding the incident has fueled further scrutiny over how such valuable assets are managed within large entertainment corporations. Afram’s legal team argues that the loss of Fortitude represents a substantial financial and creative setback, given the time and resources invested in the project. They claim that Netflix failed to take appropriate steps to safeguard the material once it entered their possession. The lawsuit seeks not only monetary damages but also accountability for the alleged negligence in securing the film. The dispute comes amid growing concerns in the entertainment industry about the risks associated with digital and physical media distribution. As more content moves online, the need for robust security measures becomes increasingly critical. This case could set a precedent for how companies handle similar situations involving lost or stolen intellectual property. Industry experts have noted that while digital distribution has become the norm, physical media still plays a role in certain aspects of film production and distribution. The handling of such materials often involves complex logistics and requires strict adherence to security guidelines to prevent losses. The outcome of this lawsuit may influence future practices in how films are transferred and stored by major studios. As the legal proceedings unfold, both parties are expected to provide further evidence and testimony regarding the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of Fortitude. The case will likely draw attention from the entertainment sector, particularly concerning the responsibilities of platforms like Netflix in protecting the content they receive for distribution.

1 reports

El Universal logoEl UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Netflix sued over the disappearance of a Nicolas Cage film

A film producer has sued Netflix over the disappearance of a World War II movie starring Nicolas Cage titled 'Fortitude.' The lawsuit was filed by writer and producer Simon Afram in a federal court in California, alleging that Netflix lost an unencrypted copy of the film stored on a hard drive. The movie was delivered to Netflix in mid-June for screening and purchase, but shortly after, Netflix informed the producers that several hard drives had been stolen from their Los Angeles offices, including 'Fortitude.' Afram claims he invested over $45 million into the production, which took seven years to complete and was in the process of being sold to distributors. Netflix responded by stating it would not take responsibility for the loss of a film distributed without standard industry security measures.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal dispute involving a film production and streaming platform, focusing on the loss of a movie rather than any political issue, figure, or policy. There is no indication of political framing or bias in the reporting.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a lawsuit filed by Simon Afram against Netflix over the disappearance of a Nicolas Cage film titled 'Fortitude'. It cites the claim that Netflix lost an unencrypted hard drive containing the movie, and that the production cost $45 million over seven years. The article also men

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the lawsuit from the perspective of the plaintiff, Simon Afram, and includes his allegations against Netflix. While it quotes both sides (Netflix's denial), the tone leans toward portraying Netflix as negligent, which introduces some bias. The language used ('demandan', 'exige u

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories