ON
← Back to feed
Delhi HC tells Centre to decide within 15 days on removing Dhruv Rathee's video on Hindu deities
India🏛️ Politics17 hr. ago

Delhi HC tells Centre to decide within 15 days on removing Dhruv Rathee's video on Hindu deities

The Delhi High Court has instructed the Union government's Grievance Appellate Committee to decide within 15 days whether to remove a video by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, which discusses the dietary habits of Hindu deities like Ram and Krishna. The video, uploaded on March 21, claims these deities consumed meat and alcohol, leading to an appeal by lawyer Amita Sachdeva who alleges the content is derogatory and inflames communal tensions. The government's counsel argued that YouTube should remove the video, citing potential harm to religious sentiments, while Google's representative stated the company had responded to the complaint. The court emphasized that failure to comply would be treated seriously, and Sachdeva has also filed a criminal complaint alleging distortion of Hindu scriptures.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentRightFactual 85Objective 7517 hr. ago
Delhi HC tells Centre to decide within 15 days on removing Dhruv Rathee's video on Hindu deities

The Delhi High Court has instructed the Union government's Grievance Appellate Committee to decide within 15 days whether to remove a video by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, which discusses the dietary habits of Hindu deities like Ram and Krishna. The video, uploaded on March 21, claims these deities consumed meat and alcohol, leading to an appeal by lawyer Amita Sachdeva who alleges the content is derogatory and inflames communal tensions. The government's counsel argued that YouTube should remove the video, citing potential harm to religious sentiments, while Google's representative stated the company had responded to the complaint. The court emphasized that failure to comply would be treated seriously, and Sachdeva has also filed a criminal complaint alleging distortion of Hindu scriptures.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the issue through the lens of protecting religious sentiments and communal harmony, emphasizing the 'derogatory' nature of the video and the potential harm to the 'majority community.' The language used suggests a concern for maintaining social cohesion and religious respect, with

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the court's directive and the details of the case, aligning closely with the primary source. It presents both sides of the argument, though it leans slightly towards the legal proceedings and the concerns raised by Sachdeva.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories