A Delhi Police constable named Hukamchand, who lost approximately Rs 6-7 lakh in online gaming, allegedly planned and organized a series of ATM thefts to recover his losses. He recruited individuals skilled in gas cutting, including his nephew Arvind and Vikas Kumar from Bihar, and provided them with guidance through YouTube tutorials on how to access ATM cash cassettes. The group successfully stole over Rs 12 lakh in less than a month through two ATM break-ins in Faridabad. However, Hukamchand was reportedly not given any share of the stolen money, as the other members allegedly took all the proceeds. Despite being the mastermind, Hukamchand was never present at the crime scenes. The gang attempted a third theft but failed. Authorities arrested several suspects, including Hukamchand, and are now seeking their remand to investigate further and recover the stolen funds.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal investigation involving a police officer and does not exhibit clear ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. It presents the facts of the case without apparent bias toward any political side.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a Delhi Police constable involved in ATM thefts following financial loss from online gaming. It cites police statements and details the involvement of multiple individuals, including family members and accomplices. While no primary source is available, the information aligns w
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the incident as a criminal act, emphasizing the constable's role as a mastermind. It uses terms like 'allegedly' and 'scripting the heists,' which indicate some level of uncertainty, but the tone remains focused on the crime rather than moral judgment. However, the narrative fra




