Goran Lukić, head of the Labor Advisory Center, has accused former Progros owner and MP Boris Mijič of systematically exploiting workers through a pattern of corporate maneuvering. According to Lukić, Mijič represents a broader trend rather than an isolated case. He described Mijič as a symbol of a business model where individuals act as representatives or shareholders within companies, gradually withdrawing when problems arise, often transferring ownership to associates in countries such as Bulgaria, Ukraine, Serbia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. This process, Lukić claims, allows individuals to avoid responsibility while leaving behind financial liabilities for employees. The issue involves 13 foreign workers who were employed by the now-defunct construction company Progros. They are owed over €41,000 in unpaid wages, reimbursements, and other payments. The Labor Advisory Center has compiled documentation and calculated the total amount owed before passing this information to a lawyer and even contacting a detective to formally demand payment. Despite these efforts, the deadline for repayment set earlier this week passed without any action from Mijič’s side. Lukić emphasized that the situation reflects a systemic failure in protecting workers' rights. He noted that while employees might theoretically pursue legal action after two years, they would likely face insurmountable challenges since the company no longer exists. Meanwhile, the person responsible for the debts can easily evade accountability, washing their hands clean within days. From a constitutional perspective, he pointed out, the principle of free economic initiative appears to override the state's duty to ensure justice and social welfare. The controversy has escalated with the transfer of Progros to Rok Snežič, a tax advisor, under circumstances that have drawn criticism. The move was accompanied by renaming the company to Klukec, which primarily engages in camel breeding, a decision viewed as provocative by affected workers. These workers expressed frustration, questioning how they had to travel from their home country to Slovenia to discover conditions there were worse than anticipated. Their anger extends beyond the employer to the system itself, which they believe permits individuals to create such debts while remaining unaccountable. Lukić highlighted what he called a chain of mockery involving several high-profile figures. He suggested that the leadership of the parliamentary group of Resnice, Katja Kokot, the so-called tax advisor Snežič, and Mijič himself are all complicit in this mockery. This chain of derision, both within and outside the National Assembly, marks a new low according to Lukić. He argued that Mijič should be stripped of his capacity to perform any function, emphasizing that the individual has demonstrated through his history, actions, and recent responses that he is unfit for any position. The Labor Advisory Center has confirmed plans for further steps, though specific measures remain undisclosed. Lukić stated that appropriate legal procedures are available and that the center will not hesitate to take them. He reiterated that Mijič should not be allowed to hold any position again, whether leading a company, acting as a representative, or fulfilling any other role. His past conduct and recent behavior have made him unworthy of any public or private function. The situation has also drawn attention from law enforcement, as preliminary investigations into Mijič are ongoing. Lukić urged authorities to consider revoking Mijič's ability to carry out any duties, citing the need to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. The case underscores the urgent need for stronger protections for workers against exploitation and ensures that those responsible for creating financial burdens cannot escape accountability.
5 reports
VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 653 days agoThe article discusses the case of Mijič, describing him as part of a systemic issue within business practices where individuals gradually withdraw from companies as problems arise, often relocating to other countries like Bulgaria, Ukraine, or Bosnia and Herzegovina. The author argues this reflects a classic example of exploiting workers, where employees seek their rights but face obstacles due to the non-existence of the company. Meanwhile, employers, particularly responsible persons, quickly distance themselves. The piece contrasts constitutional categories of free economic initiative and social state, suggesting the former is prioritized over the latter. It further criticizes the lack of accountability and transparency, highlighting a new low in political and corporate behavior, with specific mentions of figures like Resnice Katja Kokot and Snežič being mocked within the national assembly.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure favoring corporate interests over worker protection, using strong criticism of those who evade responsibility. It emphasizes the exploitation of workers and the absence of accountability, aligning with left-wing critiques of capitalism and corporate
Why factuality (85): This article confirms the same facts as others, including the debt owed to workers, legal actions, and Lukić’s statements. It also mentions the political figures involved, which is consistent with other reports. The information remains aligned with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (65): The article has a strong critical tone toward Mijič and the political figures mentioned, such as Kokot and Snežič. This suggests a potential bias, even though the factual content is consistent across sources.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 653 days agoGoran Lukić, vodja Delavske svetovalnice, kritizira poslanca Resnice Borisa Mijiča zaradi nesprejemljivega izpustanja delavcev starega podjetja Progros. Delavci trdijo, da imajo nekaj več kot 41.000 evrov neizplačanih plač, regresov in drugih prejemkov. Lukić meni, da bi Mijiču moral biti odvzeta opravilna sposobnost, kar predstavlja klasičen primer izigravanja delavcev. Delavska svetovalnica je zbral dokumentacijo, izračunal terjatve in predal podatke odvetniku, medtem ko so uporabili tudi detektive za povabilo k poplačilu. Lukić opozarja, da je ta zadeva del širše problema, kjer se lastniki sistematično umikajo iz odgovornosti, kar vodi do veriženja podjetij in izkoriščanja delavcev. Predlogi za nadaljnje ukrepe vključujejo pravne postopeke.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of workers' rights and corporate accountability, highlighting systemic issues in business practices. The emphasis on the exploitation of workers and the failure of political figures like Mijič to uphold their responsibilities aligns with left-leaning关切.
Why factuality (85): The article reports the same facts as other sources, including the debt owed to workers, legal actions, and Lukić’s statements. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and does not contradict itself.
Why objectivity (65): The tone remains critical of Mijič and his role in a systemic issue. While the facts are consistent, the language used suggests a preference for one perspective over another.
VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 653 days ago Labor Counselor: Truth MP Boris Mijic should be disqualifiedThe article reports on a dispute involving former owner of construction company Progros, MP Boris Mijič, and the workers' advisory service Delavska svetovalnica. The workers, including 13 foreign employees, claim they are owed over 41,000 euros in unpaid wages, regressions, and other entitlements. The advisory service has collected documentation, calculated total claims, and provided this information to a lawyer, while also using private investigators to pursue payment. Despite a deadline passing, no action has been taken. The advisory service plans further legal steps. Goran Lukić, head of the advisory service, criticizes Mijič as part of a broader system where owners evade responsibility by transferring companies to others in different countries. He highlights the issue of worker exploitation through complex corporate structures and the lack of accountability. The situation is described as a classic case of employer evasion, with legal remedies being available but practically unattainable due to the dissolution of the company.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within the business model, criticizing the behavior of individuals like Mijič who evade responsibility. It emphasizes the exploitation of workers and the lack of accountability from corporate entities, which aligns with left-leaning concerns about工人
Why factuality (85): The article repeats the core facts from previous sources, including the debt owed to workers, legal actions, and Lukić’s statements. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and presents the same level of detail. No new or conflicting information is introduced.
Why objectivity (65): The article continues to present Lukić’s critique of Mijič as part of a broader system, which suggests a certain bias. While factual, the framing implies a judgment about Mijič’s behavior rather than offering a balanced view.
Primorske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 653 days agoThe article discusses a labor dispute involving former construction company Progros and its current owner Roko Snežič, where 13 foreign workers are owed over 41,000 euros in unpaid wages, regressions, and other entitlements. The workers' legal advisor, Goran Lukić, has taken multiple steps to recover the debt, including providing documentation to a lawyer, using private investigators, and sending electronic messages to Boris Mijić. Despite the deadline passing, there has been no resolution. Lukić emphasizes that this case is not an isolated incident but reflects a systemic issue of exploiting workers through complex corporate structures and absentee owners. He criticizes the lack of accountability and highlights how such practices are enabled by the legal system, calling it a classic example of worker exploitation. The situation has sparked anger among the workers, who feel they are being treated unfairly compared to their home countries.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within the economic and legal systems, highlighting exploitation of workers and the absence of accountability. It uses strong criticism of the current structure of ownership and governance, aligning with left-wing critiques of capitalism and labor权益
Why factuality (85): This article provides the same factual information as others, including the debt owed to workers, legal actions, and Lukić’s statements. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and offers no conflicting data.
Why objectivity (65): The article continues to present Lukić’s criticism of Mijič as part of a larger pattern, which may suggest a bias. While factual, the framing leans toward a particular interpretation rather than neutrality.
Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 653 days agoGoran Lukić, vodja Delavske svetovalnice, je v intervjuju za STA izrazil ogromno zanimanje za situacijo delavcev, ki terjajo od ex-lastnika podjetja Progros Boris Mijiča. Delavci, ki so bili del podjetja, nekdanjega delovnega podjetja, terjajo več kot 41.000 evrov neizplačanih plač, regresov in drugih prejemkov. Lukić je izrazil potrebo po odstranitvi opravilne sposobnosti Mijiča in opozoril na sistematsko izkoriščanje delavcev, veriženje podjetij in slamnjavo lastništvo. Nekdanji direktor Progrosa, Admir Kamerić, je prenašal podjetje brezplačno na Roka Snežiča, kar je povzročilo dodatne težave za delavce. Lukić je opozoril, da je ta zadeva klasičen primer izigravanja delavcev in da je problem obstajal že pred več desetletji.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic exploitation of workers by a corrupt business model, emphasizing the need for legal action against Mijič and highlighting structural issues within the business environment. The tone suggests a critical view of corporate practices and their impact on workers
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the actions of Delavska svetovalnica representing 13 foreign workers owed over 41,000 euros by former company Progros. It includes details about legal steps taken, such as providing documentation to lawyers and using detectives to collect payments. The information aligns with
Why objectivity (65): The tone is critical towards Mijič, suggesting he is part of a systemic issue. While factual, there is an element of editorializing when Lukić refers to the case as a 'classical example of exploiting workers,' which may imply judgment rather than neutrality.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
