ON
← Back to feed
Growth less than 2.5% at current prices: Subhash Chandra Garg stands by GDP claim
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

Growth less than 2.5% at current prices: Subhash Chandra Garg stands by GDP claim

Former Finance and Economic Affairs Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg has raised concerns about the accuracy of India's reported GDP growth for the April-June quarter of 2026. He argues that the 7.8% headline growth figure appears misleading due to a change in the statistical base used for calculation and a significant revision to the previous year's GDP data. Garg emphasized that when compared at current prices, the growth rate is much lower, less than 2.5%, and criticized the lack of transparency around the revisions. He noted that the shift to a new GDP series includes changes such as excluding certain products and companies, which could impact the overall GDP figure. While acknowledging that adjustments are normal when introducing a new series, Garg expressed doubts about the magnitude of the revisions and their implications for understanding true economic performance.

Union Minister Piyush Goyal has sharply criticized the opposition and former officials for questioning the accuracy of India's recent GDP growth figures, accusing them of attempting to undermine public confidence in the economy. Speaking to reporters in New Delhi, Goyal denied allegations that the government manipulated data to present a misleading picture of economic performance. He emphasized that ministers do not fabricate statistics and warned that those with a negative outlook toward India's economic trajectory are harming their credibility. Goyal specifically targeted former finance secretary Subhash Garg, who has raised concerns about the validity of the 7.8 percent GDP growth recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026-27. According to official data released by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation on August 31, India's real GDP expanded by 7.8 percent during the April-June period, reaching an estimated Rs 81.36 lakh crore, compared to Rs 75.46 lakh crore in the same quarter of the previous year. Nominal GDP increased by 10.3 percent to Rs 88.27 lakh crore, up from Rs 80 lakh crore in the prior year. Real gross value added (GVA) rose by 8.2 percent to Rs 73.82 lakh crore. Goyal accused critics of failing to distinguish between different GDP calculation methods, suggesting that comparisons between the old and new series are invalid. He stated that the government's approach to GDP estimation involves updating methodologies and incorporating new data sources, which naturally leads to revisions. These adjustments, he argued, reflect improvements in statistical accuracy rather than deliberate manipulation. Subhash Garg, however, has challenged the legitimacy of the 7.8 percent growth figure, citing the revision of last year's GDP from approximately Rs 86 lakh crore to Rs 80 lakh crore. According to Garg, if the original figure had remained unchanged, the growth rate in current prices would have been closer to 2.6 percent. This discrepancy has sparked debate among economists and policymakers regarding the implications of switching to a new GDP series with a base year of 2022-23, replacing the previous one based on 2011-12. The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation has defended the revised figures, stating that the changes result from ongoing methodological updates and improved data collection techniques. Officials noted that the initial estimate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025-26 under the old series was Rs 86.05 lakh crore. Following the introduction of the new series in February 2026, this figure was adjusted to Rs 80.32 lakh crore and further revised to Rs 80 lakh crore after incorporating updated data, including the Index of Industrial Production and Producer Price Index. Critics argue that the shift in base years and subsequent revisions create inconsistencies in assessing economic performance. Garg highlighted that the change in GDP calculations affects the interpretation of growth rates, especially when considering current-price estimates versus constant-price measures. He expressed concerns about the magnitude of the revision and called for greater transparency regarding the rationale behind the changes. Goyal reiterated his stance that the 7.8 percent growth rate is a true reflection of India's economic resilience, attributing it to the efforts of its citizens and the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He dismissed criticism from those he described as "jobless individuals" who attempt to discredit the nation's achievements through media appearances. The upcoming release of GDP estimates for the second quarter of fiscal year 2026-27 on November 30, 2026, will provide further insight into the trajectory of India's economy.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 829/2/2026
Growth less than 2.5% at current prices: Subhash Chandra Garg stands by GDP claim

Former Finance and Economic Affairs Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg has raised concerns about the accuracy of India's reported GDP growth for the April-June quarter of 2026. He argues that the 7.8% headline growth figure appears misleading due to a change in the statistical base used for calculation and a significant revision to the previous year's GDP data. Garg emphasized that when compared at current prices, the growth rate is much lower, less than 2.5%, and criticized the lack of transparency around the revisions. He noted that the shift to a new GDP series includes changes such as excluding certain products and companies, which could impact the overall GDP figure. While acknowledging that adjustments are normal when introducing a new series, Garg expressed doubts about the magnitude of the revisions and their implications for understanding true economic performance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Subhash Chandra Garg's critique of the GDP figures without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. It highlights his concerns about the methodology and transparency behind the revisions, rather than taking a clear ideological position. The framing remains balanced, as

Why factuality (88): The article accurately reports Subhash Chandra Garg's concerns about the GDP growth calculation, including the base year change and the revision in the previous year's GDP figures. It references the 7.8% growth and the revised current-price GDP figure, consistent with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (82): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Garg's criticisms without overt bias. It avoids taking sides and focuses on reporting his concerns and the implications of the base year change.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 789/2/2026
Govt defends GDP data after ex-FS claims Q1 growth 2.6%

The Indian government defended its GDP data after former Finance Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg claimed that the revised GDP figures could have led to a 2.6% nominal growth rate and near-zero real growth. The government explained that the revision of Q1 FY 2025-26 GDP from Rs 86 lakh crore to Rs 80 lakh crore was due to changes in methodology, including the update of the base year to 2022-23 and the use of the Producer Price Index (PPI). It emphasized that these revisions are standard practice and do not indicate any systematic bias. The statistics ministry clarified that GDP figures from different series cannot be directly compared to calculate growth rates, and that future revisions are expected to be minimal. Officials noted that the new methodology includes over 300 deflators, allowing for more accurate double deflation calculations in the manufacturing sector.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's defense of GDP data revisions without overtly favoring either side. While it highlights criticism from former officials, it does not frame the debate in a clearly left or right-leaning manner. The tone remains neutral, focusing on technical explanations rather a

Why factuality (85): The article reports the government's defense of GDP data and mentions the revision from Rs 86 lakh crore to Rs 80 lakh crore, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It includes quotes from the former finance secretary, Subhash Chandra Garg, and explains the methodological changes. However, it doe

Why objectivity (78): The tone is somewhat supportive of the government's position, using phrases like 'sanctity of GDP data' and 'completely kosher.' While it presents both sides, the emphasis on the government's stance may slightly skew the narrative.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories