Defense deal may further stir up anger against Israel in Greece

Greece and Israel announced a landmark 3 billion euro defense deal on Monday, marking a significant escalation in their military collaboration. The agreement, which includes the development of Greece’s “Achilles Shield” aerial defense system, comes amid heightened tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean and as Greece prepares for national elections in 2027. The deal is seen by some as a bold move to bolster national security, while others argue it risks alienating a population increasingly critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza. The agreement was signed during a visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who described the partnership as a continuation of a broader regional alliance. According to Israeli officials, the deal underscores the strength of Israel’s defense industry and reinforces strategic ties with Greece. The “Achilles Shield” project aims to create a multi-layered defense system capable of countering ballistic missiles, aircraft, and drones. Additional components include the sale of Drone Dome systems worth 26 million euros, enhancing Greece’s ability to monitor and neutralize airborne threats. The timing of the deal has sparked controversy, particularly given the ongoing protests in Greece against Israel’s actions in Gaza. Since 2025, pro-Palestine demonstrations have grown in frequency, with recent rallies in Piraeus targeting the Greek government’s perceived alignment with Israel. Public sentiment has shifted significantly, with a Pew Research Center survey indicating that only 30% of Greeks hold a positive view of Israel following the renewed conflict in Gaza. This decline in public support contrasts sharply with the government’s decision to proceed with the deal. Former Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis expressed dismay over the agreement, calling it a betrayal of Greek citizens who oppose what he describes as the “genocidal Apartheid state.” His comments reflect a broader discontent among opposition parties, including Syriza, which accused the government of increasing Greece’s military dependency on Israel. Syriza questioned whether the deal promotes strategic autonomy or instead integrates Greece into a larger Israeli-American security framework. Similarly, the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) condemned the deal as part of a wider effort to entangle the country in imperialist conflicts. Greek Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis defended the deal, emphasizing its role in safeguarding Greece from external threats, particularly from Turkey. He stated that the agreement ensures the country’s sovereignty against potential aggression. Georgiadis, known for his previous advocacy of closer ties with Israel, framed the deal as a necessary measure to counter Turkish influence in the region. His remarks were echoed by other government officials who highlighted the importance of modernizing Greece’s defense infrastructure. Greece’s defense spending stands at nearly 3.5% of GDP, reflecting concerns over its longstanding rivalry with Turkey. The country currently employs a mix of U.S., Russian, and European defense technologies, including the Patriot missile system and S-300 air defenses. The new deal adds to these efforts, with Greece planning to invest 28 billion euros by 2036 to develop the “Achilles Shield” and acquire advanced weaponry such as F-35 fighter jets and frigates. Joint military exercises and cooperative projects with Israel, including an air training center and cybersecurity initiatives, underscore the depth of their relationship. As the deal takes shape, it is clear that Greece faces complex geopolitical pressures. While the government frames the agreement as essential for national security, critics warn of the potential consequences for domestic politics and international standing. With the 2027 elections approaching, the decision could either solidify the government’s position or exacerbate divisions within the country.