What he had talked about with his peers and what horror he had ENTERTAINED!
A court in Belgrade sentenced Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of the school shooter, to prison terms after their son carried out a deadly attack at OŠ 'Vladislav Ribnikar'. The attacker, who was in seventh grade at the time, had previously told his peers that it would be fun if terrorists entered the school and people ran around. This statement was linked by the judge to violent video games the boy played, citing a specialist in internal medicine, Ranka Rajović, who explained how such games could affect a child's perception of reality. The boy had planned the attack weeks in advance, creating a list of students, drawing a sketch of the school, and making Molotov cocktails. He also researched topics related to antisocial behavior and psychopathy online. The attack lasted just over two minutes, during which he fired 66 shots, killing several students. The prosecution plans to appeal the sentence, arguing it is too lenient.
The trial of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of the minor who committed the mass shooting at OŠ "Vladislav Ribnikar" on May 3, 2023, has concluded with both being sentenced to prison terms. The high court in Belgrade delivered its verdict today, sentencing Vladimir Kecmanović to 14 years and six months in prison, while his wife Miljana received two years and eleven months. This comes after an appeal process that overturned parts of their initial conviction, which had included more severe penalties. The court's decision was based on evidence showing that the couple failed to properly monitor and address their son’s mental health issues, despite knowing about his access to firearms and his emotional instability.
During the proceedings, the court highlighted that the minor perpetrator had been left in a psychiatric facility following the attack, where he has limited contact with anyone other than medical staff and police officers. According to the judge, the young man has since shown signs of emotional growth, expressing belief in God and requesting to confess. He also mentioned that he now understands why his father had previously told him not to share information about his plans with friends. The court emphasized that the boy had long felt rejected and isolated, particularly during his time in elementary school, where his mother’s expectations placed immense pressure on him.
The trial revealed disturbing details about the family environment. It was established that the minor had access to multiple weapons stored in the home, including air pistols, gas cylinders, and over 6,000 rounds of ammunition. These items were found during a search of the family residence. The court noted that the boy had expressed a desire to become a psychopath and had stated that he had stopped feeling happy. His actions were described as coldly calculated, with the entire attack lasting just two minutes and one second from the first shot fired until he jumped out of the school window.
The court also addressed the role of the parents in the tragedy. They were found guilty of neglecting their responsibilities toward their son, failing to prevent his access to dangerous weapons, and not addressing his psychological state. The judge pointed out that the boy had been trained by his father in handling firearms, including visits to a shooting club. This training, combined with the lack of parental oversight, contributed significantly to the tragic outcome.
The victim families have expressed mixed emotions regarding the verdict. One parent, Anđelko Aćimović, whose daughter was among the ten victims, praised the court for delivering justice. However, legal representatives for the victims noted that they could not file appeals against the sentences but would await further developments in the case. Meanwhile, the public prosecutor announced plans to appeal the length of the sentences, arguing that they were too lenient given the severity of the crime.
The incident at OŠ "Vladislav Ribnikar" shocked the nation, leaving ten students and a security guard dead. The attacker, a minor at the time of the crime, was unable to face criminal charges due to his age. Instead, his parents were held accountable for their failure to protect him and ensure his well-being. The case has sparked discussions about gun control, parental responsibility, and the mental health support available to minors in Serbia.
As the legal process continues, the focus remains on ensuring that appropriate measures are taken to prevent similar tragedies in the future. Legal experts anticipate that the case will reach a final resolution by the end of the year, with potential changes to laws governing firearm ownership and parental accountability. The court’s findings underscore the importance of early intervention and support systems for children exhibiting signs of distress or behavioral issues.
23 reports
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 98Objective 8515 days ago
A court in Belgrade has sentenced Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović to prison terms for their roles in the neglect and abuse of their minor son, who shot nine classmates and a school guard at Osnovna škola 'Vladislav Ribnikar' on May 3, 2023. The court revealed details of weapons found in Vladimir Kecmanović's possession, including multiple pistols, three air rifles with optics, an air pistol, a gas cylinder, hundreds of bullets, and nearly 6,000 BB pellets. The sentences were increased after an appellate court overturned the initial verdict and ordered a retrial. Both the prosecution and the辩护有
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal ruling regarding a tragic school shooting and the sentencing of the parents involved. It presents factual information without overtly biased language, framing, or emphasis. The content focuses on the legal process and the evidence presented by the court, without taking
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed information about the weapons found, the sentences given, and quotes from the court's reasoning. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus. The tone is somewhat sensationalized with phrases like 'šokantne podatke' but remains mostly factual.
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 8516 days ago
The Belgrade Higher Court has sentenced Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of the school shooter at OŠ 'Vladislav Ribnikar', to prison terms following a retrial. The court determined that the shooting lasted 2 minutes and 1 second, during which the perpetrator fired 66 bullets, with 75% hitting victims. The prosecution plans to appeal the sentence due to its perceived leniency.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details of the court ruling without overtly favoring any political side. It includes direct quotes from the judge and mentions the planned appeal by the prosecutor but does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 85): This article closely aligns with the cross-source consensus, providing precise details such as the time frame of the shooting, the number of bullets, and the sentences. The reporting is more neutral compared to others, though it still includes some emotionally charged terms like 'uznemirujuće detalj
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedLeftFactual 98Objective 8016 days ago
The public prosecutor's office in Belgrade has expressed satisfaction with the verdict handed down by the Higher Court in Belgrade, which found Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović guilty of negligence related to their son's actions. Their son, a 13-year-old boy, committed a mass shooting at OŠ 'Vladislav Ribnikar' on May 3, 2023, killing nine students and security staff and injuring five others. The court confirmed the prosecution's claims regarding the parents' failures in supervising their child, recognizing the dangers, restricting access to weapons, and adequately monitoring him. The public检察官
Bias read (Left): The article emphasizes the severity of the parents' negligence and supports the prosecution's stance that no mitigating circumstances exist, suggesting the maximum penalties are just. This framing aligns with a left-leaning perspective that prioritizes strict accountability and justice for victims.
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 80): Very accurate with clear legal details and the prosecution's stance. The tone is more formal and less emotionally charged compared to others, maintaining better neutrality.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 97Objective 8215 days ago
The Belgrade Higher Court has sentenced Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, parents of the school shooter at OŠ 'Vladislav Ribnikar', to prison terms following a retrial. The court mentioned weapons found in their home, including air guns, gas cylinders, multiple pistols, nearly 6,000 BB pellets, and hundreds of bullets. The prosecution plans to appeal the sentence length. The father of one of the victims, Andjelko Aćimović, commented on the ruling.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal proceeding and the evidence presented by the court without overtly favoring any side. It includes details from the court's decision and quotes from both the judge and the victim’s family, presenting facts neutrally.
Why these scores (Factual 97 · Objective 82): This article accurately reports the sentences, the weapons found, and includes relevant quotes from the court and victims' families. It slightly leans toward victim advocacy with statements like 'prezadovoljan presudom,' but overall maintains factual accuracy.
KurirParty-alignedCenterFactual 97Objective 7516 days ago
The Chief Prosecutor of the Higher Public Prosecution Office in Belgrade, Nenad Stefanović, announced that the office will appeal the verdict against Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of the 13-year-old boy who carried out a mass shooting at OŠ 'Vladislav Ribnikar' on May 3, 2023. The prosecution stated that the court's conviction confirmed their claims regarding the parents' negligence, including failure to recognize dangers, restrict access to weapons, and adequately supervise their child. The prosecutors argue that only maximum penalties would be just and lawful given the severe
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal proceedings following a school shooting, focusing on the prosecution's response to a court ruling. It presents statements from the chief prosecutor without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The content is factual and does not appear to favor any particular政治
Why these scores (Factual 97 · Objective 75): The article presents accurate information regarding the court's decision and the charges against the parents. However, it leans toward supporting the prosecution's stance by emphasizing the severity of the parents' neglect and stating that only maximum sentences would be fair, showing a clear bias.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 96Objective 8015 days ago
A court in Belgrade has sentenced the parents of K.K., a student from the elementary school 'Vladislav Ribnikar', to prison terms following a retrial. The court stated that K.K. had created a sketch of the school and a list of 'primary targets' two to three weeks before the mass shooting. According to the judge, K.K. researched the Columbine High School massacre online in March 2023 and was inspired by it. He planned the attack, wrote down the names of 15 students, and made a sketch of the school. He kept these documents in his desk drawer. K.K. explained that the list included names of those他
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal proceeding and provides details based on court testimony without apparent ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 96 · Objective 80): The article details the planning by the perpetrator, including his list of targets and inspiration from Colorado. It aligns with the cross-source consensus but uses emotionally charged language such as 'stravičnog napadača,' which affects objectivity.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 8515 days ago
The Belgrade Higher Court has handed down a verdict sentencing Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, parents of the perpetrator of the May 3, 2023 mass shooting at the elementary school 'Vladislav Ribnikar,' to prison terms. The court found both guilty and imposed sentences of 14 years and six months on Vladimir Kecmanović and two years and eleven months on Miljana Kecmanović. The father of the deceased girl, Angelina, expressed satisfaction with the court's decision and praised the judge for delivering a clear message to all involved.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal proceeding involving a high-profile criminal case and includes direct quotes from an affected family member. It presents facts without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the judicial process and reactions from the受害者
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed and specific information about the verdicts given to Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, including exact sentence lengths and quotes from the father of the victim. It also includes precise details about the timeline of the attack. However, the emotional tone of the father’
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 8016 days ago
The Higher Court in Belgrade has issued a verdict against Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of the school shooter at Osnovna škola 'Vladislav Ribnikar'. Both were sentenced to prison terms. The court stated that the boy committed the massacre in 2 minutes and 1 second after firing the first shot at the security guard. He fired a total of 66 shots, with 75% hitting victims. The boy, who was under 14 years old at the time, used two pistols taken from his father's safe. He carried them to school and killed nine students and a teacher during the first class, injuring five others.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal ruling regarding the parents of a school shooter. It provides factual details about the court's decision, the timeline of events, and the consequences of the shooting. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. The content remains纪
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): The article provides detailed information from the court ruling, including the duration of the shooting, number of bullets fired, and the sentences given. It accurately reflects the facts as reported by other sources. However, the tone is emotionally charged with phrases like 'monstrum' and 'masakr,
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 7816 days ago
The Belgrade Higher Court has sentenced Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, parents of the minor attacker involved in the school shooting at OŠ 'Vladislav Ribnikar', to prison terms following a retrial. The court detailed the timeline of the attack, which lasted exactly 2 minutes and 1 second, during which the perpetrator fired 66 bullets, with 75% hitting victims including the security guard and students.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual details about the legal proceedings and the specifics of the attack without overtly favoring any political perspective. It focuses on the judicial process and the reconstruction of events by the court, maintaining neutrality in tone and content.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 78): The article gives precise details about the timeline and number of bullets fired during the attack. While it is largely factual, the emphasis on the horror of the event and the phrase 'tek nešto više od dve stravične minute' introduces some subjectivity.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 7516 days ago
The article discusses the trial of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of a 13-year-old boy who carried out a mass shooting at the elementary school Vladislav Ribnikar in May 2023, killing nine students and a security guard and injuring six others. The prosecution is seeking prison sentences of 14 years and 11 months for the father and three years for the mother, while the defense denies any criminal responsibility, claiming they could not have predicted the tragedy. The article highlights the emotional impact of the incident on the victims' families and the broader community.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about the legal proceedings and the tragic event without overtly favoring either the prosecution or the defense. It focuses on the human impact of the incident and does not include biased language or selective sourcing that would indicate a clear ideological傾
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article provides detailed information about the case, including the number of victims, the parents on trial, and the injuries sustained by others. The facts align with the cross-source consensus. However, the language is emotionally charged, using terms like 'symbol of collective grief' and 'unf
Večernje novostiParty-alignedLeftFactual 95Objective 7015 days ago
The Higher Court in Belgrade has issued a verdict against Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of a boy who carried out a mass shooting at the elementary school 'Vladislav Ribnikar' on May 3, 2023. Vladimir was sentenced to 14 years and six months in prison, while Miljana received a sentence of two years and eleven months. After leaving the courthouse, Andjelko Aćimović, the father of the deceased girl Angelina, expressed satisfaction with the court's decision and praised the presiding judge, Dragutin Martinović, for conducting the proceedings impeccably. He emphasized that the ruling送
Bias read (Left): The article emphasizes emotional reactions from the victim's family and highlights the judicial process as delivering a clear message to society, which aligns with progressive values emphasizing justice and accountability. The framing focuses on the moral and societal impact of the verdict rather on
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): Accurate in detailing the sentences and the father’s reaction. The article includes emotional quotes from the victim’s father, which affects the overall objectivity.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 93Objective 7816 days ago
The article reports on an upcoming second-degree verdict in the case of Miljana and Vladimir Kecmanović, the parents of Nemanja Marinković, who committed a mass shooting at the Primary School 'Vladislav Ribnikar' on May 3, 2023, killing nine students and a security worker. The High Court in Belgrade will deliver the verdict tomorrow after the Appellate Court overturned the initial sentence regarding the parents of the minor offender and sent the case back for reconsideration. The original verdict sentenced Vladimir Kecmanović to 14.5 years in prison, while Miljana Kecmanović received three 3 3
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced summary of the legal proceedings without overtly favoring either the prosecution or defense. It includes details from both sides of the case, such as the requested sentences by the public prosecutor and the defense’s arguments for acquittal. There is no evident loaded
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 78): The article accurately reports the sentences and includes direct statements from the defense attorney. However, it leans more toward presenting the defense’s perspective, which affects the overall balance and neutrality of the reporting.
N1 SrbijaIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 8216 days ago
The Chief Prosecutor of the Higher Public Prosecution Office in Belgrade, Nenad Stefanović, stated that the prosecution is satisfied with the conviction of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of a boy who committed a mass shooting at an elementary school in May 2023. The prosecution claims that the evidence confirmed their allegations, including neglect of the child and failure to recognize dangers, restrict access to weapons, and provide adequate supervision. Stefanović emphasized that the severe consequences of the parents' negligence justify the maximum penalties proposed by the检察院
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal proceedings following a tragic event without apparent ideological framing. It presents statements from the prosecutor and focuses on the legal process rather than taking a political stance.
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 82): This article gives accurate details about the legal process, including the previous appeal court decision and the requested sentences by the prosecution. The content is mostly factual, though it hints at defense arguments without providing full context, which might slightly reduce neutrality.
N1 SrbijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8015 days ago
The article discusses recent legal developments involving the parents of a boy who committed a mass shooting at a school in Belgrade three years ago. The father, Vladimir Kecmanović, was sentenced to 14 years and six months, while the mother, Miljana Kecmanović, received a sentence of two years and eleven months. The report also touches on the 'Senjak' case, which involves unclear details surrounding the murder of Aleksandar Nešović at Restaurant 27. Additionally, the article addresses reproductive health rights in Serbia and mentions the proposed Parent-Caregiver Law introduced by the Serbian
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about legal proceedings without overtly favoring any side. It includes multiple perspectives, such as comments from lawyers involved in the cases, but does not exhibit clear bias through language or emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports the sentences given to the parents and mentions the chief prosecutor’s satisfaction with the verdict. However, it briefly shifts focus to unrelated cases, which introduces some irrelevance but does not detract significantly from the main facts.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 7515 days ago
The article discusses the sentencing of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, who were convicted of serious crimes including endangering public safety and neglecting a minor. The court stated that the minor perpetrator, involved in the school massacre at 'Vladislav Ribnikar,' has been in a psychiatric institution since the incident, with no contact except with doctors and police officers. During his time there, he learned to express emotions, began believing in God, and requested to confess. He also mentioned that his father had previously told him not to tell friends about going to a shooting site
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a legal case without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on judicial proceedings and statements made by the court, maintaining neutrality in tone and content.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): This article presents factual details from the court proceedings accurately, including the boy's psychological state and motivations. It maintains a more neutral tone compared to others but still includes some interpretative statements.
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 6015 days ago
The article reports on the sentencing of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, parents of the perpetrator of the school massacre at 'Vladislav Ribnikar' elementary school. During the search of their home, multiple weapons were found, including air pistols, gas cylinders, three air rifles with optics, several pistols, nearly 6,000 BB pellets, and hundreds of bullets. The court sentenced Vladimir to 14 years and six months in prison, while Miljana received two years and eleven months. The public prosecutor announced plans to appeal the sentence due to its perceived leniency.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the legal proceedings, the evidence found during the search, and the sentences handed down by the court. It includes quotes from judicial officials and mentions the planned appeal by the public prosecutor without overtly favoring any side. The tone is报道
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): The article reports on the weapons found and the legal outcomes accurately. However, it includes strong emotional reactions from victims' families and uses phrases like 'crne hronike' which may influence objectivity.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 6514 days ago
The article discusses the trial of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, whose son committed a school massacre on May 3rd. It highlights testimonies from surviving students describing the perpetrator's demeanor as robotic and demonic. The court's ruling revealed that the decision to commit the attack was made two to three weeks prior, inspired by the Columbine school shooting. Details include the perpetrator's preparation, such as hiding weapons and testing surveillance cameras. The article also notes that neither parent checked on their son before he left the house on the morning of the attack.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual details from the court proceedings without overtly favoring either the parents or the perpetrator. It presents evidence and testimonies neutrally, focusing on the events and actions described in the trial without apparent ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides detailed accounts from survivors and court reconstructions, aligning with cross-source consensus on the events. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'stravičnu istinu' and 'jeziv,' which may affect objectivity.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 6521 days ago
The article discusses the relationship between Miljana Kecmanović and her son, who was involved in a school shooting in which nine students and a teacher were killed. During the final statements at the trial, excerpts from communications between Kecmanović and her son were read, revealing tense interactions. The son reportedly told his mother he hated her, while she sent him messages like 'Je*i se, sine' (likely a misspelled or censored version of 'Zdravo, sine,' meaning 'Hello, son'). The article also mentions that Kecmanović criticized her son's behavior toward his younger sister in some of
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information from court proceedings without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It focuses on the content of private communications between a defendant and her son, with no clear ideological framing or emphasis on political implications.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides specific quotes from court proceedings and includes details about the communication between Miljana Kecmanović and her son, citing sources present in the courtroom. However, it leans into emotionally charged language such as 'jeziv odnos' (terrible relationship), which may influ
Večernje novostiParty-alignedLeftFactual 80Objective 6023 days ago
Several legal representatives for families affected by the May 3, 2023 school shooting at Primary School 'Vladislav Ribnikar' presented closing arguments against Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, who were on trial for neglecting their child and committing acts endangering public safety. Goran Petronijević, representing the Aćimović family, stated that three years have not lessened the pain of the families, emphasizing that the tragedy was preventable due to parental negligence. He highlighted that the parents failed to secure firearms properly, did not monitor their teenager’s interest in guns,
Bias read (Left): The article emphasizes parental negligence and systemic failures, using emotionally charged language such as 'dete se ne rađa kao zločinac, to se stiče. Gde? U porodici.' This framing suggests a critique of societal and familial structures, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that focus on root-
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): The article includes statements from representatives of affected families and discusses the lack of proper gun storage and parental oversight. While it provides relevant facts, it uses emotionally charged language and frames the parents' actions in a highly critical manner, suggesting a lack of neut
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6016 days ago
The article reports on the upcoming verdict in the retrial of Vladimir and Miljana Kecmanović, the parents of the school shooter who killed nine people in 2023. The appeal court overturned the initial conviction due to unclear reasoning and contradictory arguments, requiring a detailed reassessment of all evidence. Defense attorney Zora Dobričanin cited Nin Kobiljski’s statement emphasizing that the trial is about safeguarding the future rather than revisiting the past. The prosecutor requested maximum sentences for both defendants.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about the legal proceedings without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both defense and prosecution perspectives but does not editorialize or use biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): This article mentions the appeal process and the new trial but lacks detailed specifics about the evidence or the nature of the communications between the parents and their son. It cites an advocate’s statement but presents limited direct information from the trial itself. The tone appears somewhat
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Serbia
