Should the Cali Fair be held? These are the arguments for and against holding this event in the midst of the emergency

The decision to hold the Cali Fair 2026 has sparked intense debate following the August 10 earthquake that left 147 dead, over 1,657 injured, nearly 5,000 homes damaged, and more than 10,000 families affected, equivalent to approximately 25,000 citizens. Over 24 buildings collapsed, and more than 170 remain under structural review. Amid this devastation, city officials face mounting pressure to decide whether to proceed with one of the largest festivals in Colombia, which typically generates around half a billion pesos for the local economy. Supporters argue that holding the fair is essential for economic recovery. María del Carmen Londoño, a member of the Pacto Histórico council, emphasized that the event provides critical financial support to the city’s economy. She noted that many residents, particularly those in the cultural sector such as salsa schools and orchestras, rely heavily on the fair for annual income. “For me, it is prudent to hold the Cali Fair because it brings in half a billion pesos, which are necessary to revive our city's economy,” she stated. “Many people in Cali who work in culture have their only annual income through these activities.” Roberto Ortiz, another opposition councilman, echoed similar sentiments. He argued that canceling the fair would contradict its historical significance. “The earthquake of August 10 devastated the heart of Cali. In seconds, tragedy took loved ones, dreams, and years of effort amidst rubble and tears. Today, as the city still mourns, some propose postponing the Cali Fair 2026. That idea betrays the spirit in which this festival was born,” he said. Ortiz believes the fair can once again serve as a space for the community to come together and regain hope. “The fair should take place: it is time to unite and remember that even wounded, Cali always rises again,” he added. Brany Prado, president of the National Gastronomic Association of Colombia, joined the call to keep the fair running. He sees it as a tool for economic recovery. “I believe, according to the timelines set by both the national government and the city government, the Cali Fair should go ahead, not out of indifference, but as part of a strategy to revitalize the city’s economy,” he explained. “While it is true that there will be a special fund for rebuilding homes, I think both actions must happen in parallel, without neglecting either.” Prado highlighted the economic impact of the fair on artists, dancers, restaurants, small businesses, and workers tied to the cultural economy. He suggested the event should take place in December but with a different focus. Opponents, however, argue that hosting the fair during the ongoing crisis could exacerbate suffering. Some claim that thousands of families still lack permanent housing and are living in makeshift shelters. They question how the city can prioritize celebration when so many residents are struggling to rebuild their lives. Others suggest that the fair might divert attention and resources away from immediate relief efforts. The city’s mayor, Alejandro Eder, faces considerable scrutiny as he weighs the competing demands. While some council members and business leaders advocate for the fair, others warn against proceeding too soon. The debate reflects broader tensions between economic revitalization and humanitarian concerns. As the city grapples with the aftermath of the disaster, the fate of the Cali Fair remains uncertain, with decisions likely to hinge on further assessments of both the physical damage and the emotional state of the population.