The Austrian government has reportedly entered into a multi-million-euro contract with a U.S.-based surveillance company, allowing authorities to track individuals using data collected from mobile devices. This revelation comes after documents obtained from a public procurement portal indicated that Austria has extended its license for a surveillance software called Webloc, developed by the firm Penlink. The initial report was published by the Austrian newspaper *Der Standard*, which highlighted concerns over how this technology could enable law enforcement to access precise location data from up to 500 million smartphones globally.
Webloc is described as a tool capable of accessing a vast stream of data, including exact GPS coordinates and unique device identifiers used for targeted advertising. These identifiers, known as "mobile advertising IDs," can be linked to movement profiles, revealing sensitive personal information such as home addresses, workplaces, visits to medical facilities, religious sites, or other private locations. According to research conducted by *netzpolitik.org* and the Bavarian Broadcasting Corporation since 2024, these data points are often collected by popular smartphone apps under the guise of being used solely for advertising purposes but then passed on to data brokers and eventually to surveillance firms.
Experts have raised alarms about the potential misuse of such data, suggesting that the use of these tools might violate the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The German Federal Ministry of Consumer Protection had previously stated that transferring personal data purely for commercial reasons is incompatible with data protection laws. Similar concerns exist in Austria and Germany regarding whether security agencies should be allowed to utilize such data.
The Austrian Interior Ministry did not directly comment on the use of Webloc when contacted by *netzpolitik.org*. Instead, they emphasized that any software solutions would be used within the bounds of legal frameworks. However, their response did not provide enough transparency to independently verify the legality of the software's deployment. The ministry’s silence suggests a lack of willingness to disclose detailed information about the extent and nature of the surveillance activities.
According to the procurement documents, Austria has already paid Penlink for a two-year extension of the license, amounting to approximately 1.85 million euros. The package includes not just Webloc but also other products offered by the company, one of which is named Tangles. This product is said to allow monitoring of social media platforms, forums, and messaging services like Telegram. Users can search for names, phone numbers, or email addresses to gather available online information.
This situation raises significant privacy concerns, especially given the potential for abuse of such powerful surveillance capabilities. While the Austrian government claims to operate within legal boundaries, the opacity surrounding the use of these technologies leaves room for speculation and concern among civil liberties advocates and digital rights organizations. The implications of such surveillance practices extend beyond national borders, affecting anyone who uses a smartphone with ad-supported applications without taking measures to protect their digital identity.
2 reports
netzpolitik.orgIndependentLeftFactual 65Objective 503 days agoThe Austrian government has extended a license for surveillance software called Webloc, developed by the U.S. firm Penlink, which collects location data from up to 500 million mobile devices worldwide. This information includes precise GPS locations and unique advertising identifiers used by apps. The data is typically collected for advertising purposes but flows through the ad industry ecosystem to data brokers and then to surveillance companies. Experts argue this violates the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as personal data being traded purely as a commodity is incompatible with privacy laws. Research by netzpolitik.org and other outlets has shown how popular mobile apps transfer user data to third parties, enabling authorities to track individuals' movements, including sensitive locations like medical facilities or religious sites. Austria’s Interior Ministry did not directly comment on the use of Webloc, stating it would not disclose specific software solutions due to legal constraints.
Bias read (Left): The article highlights concerns over surveillance technology, potential violations of GDPR, and criticism of government transparency. It frames the issue as a threat to civil liberties and privacy rights, emphasizing the ethical and legal implications of using such tools without clear oversight or公众
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 50): The article accurately reports on the license extension for surveillance software but frames it within a broader context of data privacy concerns. While the primary source confirms the extension, the article emphasizes potential misuse and ethical implications, which may not be directly supported by
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒LeftFactual 30Objective 404 days agoThe article discusses the risks associated with copying identification documents at hotels, highlighting how this practice violates EU data protection regulations and facilitates identity theft. It explains that photographing passports or ID cards during hotel check-in is illegal under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as it opens the door to fraud and misuse by hackers. The piece references a recent case in Italy where thousands of scanned IDs were sold in the dark web for up to €10,000, and warns of potential consequences such as being falsely accused of crimes after returning from vacation. It also cites a case involving a woman from Tyrol who was accused of tax evasion and fraud due to her ID being stolen. Legal expert Thomas Kolb notes that while verifying identity through document presentation is required, making copies without consent is not necessary and often done out of convenience rather than legal obligation.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue of hotel staff copying ID documents as a violation of GDPR, emphasizing the risks and legal implications. While it presents the facts objectively, it leans toward criticizing institutional practices (like hotels and receptionists) and highlights systemic issues in data保护
Why these scores (Factual 30 · Objective 40): This article discusses identity theft in hotels and is unrelated to the primary source document about the license extension. It lacks factual connection to the event described in the source and presents a different topic altogether. Objectivity score is low due to focus on crime and consequences rat
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Germany
