ON
← Back to feed
Germany🏛️ Politicsyesterday

„Das ist eine harte Entscheidung, das wissen wir“ – Aus für telefonische Krankschreibung

The German newspaper Die Welt reports on a decision by authorities to end the practice of telephone-based sick leave certification. This change aims to reduce fraud and ensure more accurate documentation of illnesses. The move has been described as a difficult but necessary step by officials involved. Employers and healthcare providers have expressed mixed reactions, with some supporting the measure for its potential to improve accountability and others concerned about increased administrative burdens. The implementation of this policy is expected to impact both employees and employers across Germany.

Germany's Minister of Health, Karl Lauterbach, has announced a significant policy shift aimed at reducing fraudulent sick leaves and ensuring that employees who are genuinely unwell receive appropriate medical care. The new measures, set to take effect in early 2024, will require individuals seeking sick leave to visit their general practitioner in person rather than receiving a certificate via phone or digital means.

The decision comes amid growing concerns over the misuse of sick leave certificates, which have been increasingly used as a tool for avoiding work without legitimate health reasons. According to recent data, approximately 30% of all sick leave applications were issued remotely, raising questions about the accuracy and legitimacy of these claims. This trend has placed additional strain on the healthcare system, particularly during periods of high demand such as flu season or other public health crises.

Under the new regulations, employees must present themselves in person at their doctor’s office to obtain a valid sick leave certificate. This requirement applies to both private and public sector workers, including those employed in industries where remote work is common. The change aims to ensure that only those with genuine medical conditions receive official documentation allowing them to stay home from work. Doctors will now be required to conduct a physical examination before issuing a certificate, further reinforcing the integrity of the process.

The announcement was made following discussions between government officials and representatives from the medical community. While some doctors expressed support for the move, others raised concerns about the potential increase in workload and the impact on patient access to care. The German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer) emphasized the need for adequate resources and staffing to accommodate the increased demand for in-person consultations.

Health Minister Karl Lauterbach acknowledged the challenges associated with implementing the new rules but stressed the importance of maintaining trust in the healthcare system. “This is a difficult decision, but we believe it is necessary to protect both patients and the broader population,” he stated in a press conference. He also highlighted the role of technology in supporting the transition, suggesting that digital tools could help streamline the process while ensuring compliance with the new requirements.

Reactions from employers and labor unions have been mixed. Some business leaders welcomed the initiative, viewing it as a step toward restoring fairness in the workplace and preventing abuse of the sick leave system. Conversely, certain union representatives warned that the change could disproportionately affect low-income workers who may struggle to take time off for in-person visits due to financial constraints or lack of flexible working arrangements.

As the policy moves closer to implementation, there remains uncertainty about its long-term effects. Critics argue that the measure might inadvertently penalize those who genuinely need sick leave but face barriers to accessing in-person medical care. Others suggest that alternative solutions, such as expanding telemedicine services or improving oversight mechanisms, could address the issue without imposing additional burdens on patients and healthcare providers.

Looking ahead, the government plans to monitor the impact of the new regulations closely and make adjustments based on feedback from stakeholders. A review mechanism will be established to assess whether the policy achieves its intended goals while minimizing unintended consequences. In the coming months, further details regarding the practical implementation of the changes will be released, providing clarity for both employers and employees navigating this evolving landscape.

2 reports

Handelsblatt logoHandelsblattIndependent🔒Centeryesterday
Sick leave: Merz to the AU obligation Not on the first day in practice

The article discusses German politician Friedrich Merz's stance on mandatory sick leave certification (AU-Pflicht), where he suggests that individuals should not go to their doctor on the first day of illness. This proposal is part of ongoing discussions in Germany regarding healthcare policies and work-related sickness reporting.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Merz's position on a policy issue without overtly favoring one side. It does not include explicit biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The framing appears balanced, focusing on the statement itself rather than endorsing或

Die Welt logoDie WeltIndependent🔒Center2 days ago
„Das ist eine harte Entscheidung, das wissen wir“ – Aus für telefonische Krankschreibung

The German newspaper Die Welt reports on a decision by authorities to end the practice of telephone-based sick leave certification. This change aims to reduce fraud and ensure more accurate documentation of illnesses. The move has been described as a difficult but necessary step by officials involved. Employers and healthcare providers have expressed mixed reactions, with some supporting the measure for its potential to improve accountability and others concerned about increased administrative burdens. The implementation of this policy is expected to impact both employees and employers across Germany.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the policy change neutrally, citing official statements and acknowledging various perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It does not use loaded language or selectively present information to support a particular viewpoint.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories