ON
← Back to feed
The Bundesgericht confirms that the cancellation of bonuses for CS cadres was lawful
CH🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

The Bundesgericht confirms that the cancellation of bonuses for CS cadres was lawful

The Federal Court of Switzerland has confirmed that the removal of bonuses for members of the Swiss People's Party (CS) was legally justified. This decision relates to a previous ruling where the court upheld the government's decision to revoke certain financial benefits granted to CS officials. The ruling reinforces the legal basis for the government's actions and signals that such decisions are within the bounds of Swiss law.

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court has confirmed that the cancellation of bonuses for top executives at Credit Suisse was lawful. This decision upholds the earlier ruling by the federal administration, which had ordered the reduction or elimination of bonuses for the highest three levels of management at the bank following its takeover by UBS with government support in March 2023. Between 2012 and 2022, the variable compensation of Credit Suisse managers totaled 31.7 billion Swiss francs, while the bank's annual results showed a total loss of 32.3 billion francs during the same period. A dozen former CS managers challenged the bonus cuts through legal means, arguing that their bonuses were guaranteed under employment contracts and that their removal constituted an excessive interference with property rights. The Federal Administrative Court initially supported this view, stating there was no legal basis for the Federal Department of Finance’s (EFD) directive. However, the EFD and UBS appealed, and the Federal Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appeal. It cited provisions in the Banking Act allowing the federal government to impose measures on remuneration if state aid is granted to a systemically important bank. According to the court, variable compensation for past periods contributing to the need for state assistance should not be funded by public money. The court emphasized that poor performance should not result in rewards, noting that Credit Suisse’s management failed to prevent the bank’s collapse.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Neue Zürcher Zeitung logoNeue Zürcher ZeitungIndependent🔒Centeryesterday
The Bundesgericht confirms that the cancellation of bonuses for CS cadres was lawful

The Federal Court of Switzerland has confirmed that the removal of bonuses for members of the Swiss People's Party (CS) was legally justified. This decision relates to a previous ruling where the court upheld the government's decision to revoke certain financial benefits granted to CS officials. The ruling reinforces the legal basis for the government's actions and signals that such decisions are within the bounds of Swiss law.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a judicial decision regarding the legality of removing bonuses for a political party's leadership. It presents the court's confirmation of the government's action without apparent bias, focusing on the legal justification rather than taking a stance on the political merits of撤

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicCenteryesterday
Federal Court on CS-Boni CS CS managers have failed, therefore they are not rewarded

The Swiss Federal Court has ruled against the management of Credit Suisse (CS), denying them bonuses despite the bank's collapse. The court determined that the managers failed in their duties, which led to the downfall of the institution. This decision comes after the bank was acquired by UBS in a government-backed merger. The ruling highlights the legal accountability of executives in cases of corporate failure.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a judicial decision regarding executive accountability without overtly favoring any political side. It focuses on the legal outcome rather than expressing ideological bias.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories