ON
← Back to feed
Court sentence four rapists to 95 years imprisonment in Niger
NG🏛️ Politics7 days ago

Court sentence four rapists to 95 years imprisonment in Niger

A Nigerian court has sentenced four men to a combined total of 95 years in prison for gang-raping a 13-year-old girl in Kontagora, Niger State. The defendants—Salisu Shehu Baura, Lawali Shaibu, Haruna Musa Saidu, and Bello—were apprehended by the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and faced charges under sections 97 of the penal code and section 26(1) of the Child Rights Law. Bello, who was granted bail, remains at large. During the trial, prosecutors presented evidence including video recordings, written statements, a medical report, and witness testimonies from the victim, her father, and the investigating officer. The presiding magistrate condemned the crime as 'animalistic and heartless,' emphasizing the need for deterrence. The defense argued for leniency due to the perpetrators' expressed remorse, but the court rejected this, noting that remorse does not excuse criminal behavior. The state government praised the ruling as a significant step in combating such crimes.

Four men have been sentenced to a combined 95 years in prison for the gang-rape and subsequent impregnation of a 13-year-old girl in Kontagora, Niger State. The sentencing occurred at the Minna Senior Magistrate Court No. 4, where the defendants—Salisu Shehu Baura, Lawali Shaibu, Haruna Musa Saidu, and Bello—were found guilty of committing the crime in 2023. The court heard that the men took turns raping the minor under duress and then gave her N1,400 afterward. As a result of the attack, the girl became pregnant.

The four men were apprehended by the Kontagora Divisional Command of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC). Following their arrest, they were transported to the state command headquarters for prosecution. During the trial, the prosecution presented several pieces of evidence, including video and written statements from the convicts, the victim's statement, a medical report confirming penetration, and voice recordings. Three witnesses testified during the trial: the victim, her father, and the investigating NSCDC officer.

Senior Magistrate Christy Umar Barau presided over the case and delivered the verdict. In her judgment, she described the acts committed by the convicts as "animalistic and heartless." She emphasized that the increasing frequency of rape cases, especially against minors, necessitated strict judicial action to serve as a deterrent for potential offenders. Although the defense counsel, Mohammed Jibrin Lemu, requested the court to show mercy considering the convicts' expressions of remorse during the trial, the judge rejected this appeal, stating that the severity of the offense required appropriate punishment.

The court sentenced the first, second, and third convicts—Salisu Shehu Baura, Lawali Shaibu, and Haruna Musa Saidu—to 20 years each for the offense of unlawful sexual intercourse with a child and five additional years for the charge of joint act. These sentences will be served concurrently, totaling 25 years per person. The fourth defendant, Bello, who was sentenced in absentia, received a 20-year term for the same offense. However, Bello is currently at large after being granted bail.

The state government welcomed the judgment as a significant milestone in its ongoing efforts to combat rape, child abuse, and other forms of sexual violence. Hajiya Hadiza Idris Kuta, the Commissioner for Women Affairs and Social Services, praised the decision, calling it a victory for justice and a clear warning to those who commit similar offenses.

The case highlights broader issues concerning child protection and the enforcement of child rights laws in Niger State. Reports indicate that there has been a rise in incidents involving sexual violence against minors, with some cases involving very young children. Advocacy groups and local officials have consistently urged for stronger implementation of existing legal frameworks aimed at protecting children and ensuring swift prosecution of offenders.

Despite these calls, nationally, child rape remains significantly underreported due to factors such as social stigma, familial pressures, and inadequate institutional support. Legal experts have criticized the sluggish pace of justice delivery and the tendency for lighter sentences in certain sexual offense cases, arguing that this can encourage further criminal behavior.

The recent convictions in Minna are seen as a strong message from the judiciary that such crimes against minors will face severe consequences. This development aligns with the broader push for enhanced measures to safeguard children and ensure that perpetrators face appropriate legal repercussions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

Premium Times Nigeria logoPremium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 708 days ago
Four bag 95 years in prison for gang-raping, impregnating 13-year-old in Niger State

Four men have been sentenced to a combined 95 years in prison for gang-raping and impregnating a 13-year-old girl in Kontagora, Niger State. The convicts—Salisu Baura, Lawali Sha’ibu, Haruna Sa’idu, and Bello (surname not provided)—were found guilty of jointly committing the crime and engaging in unlawful sexual intercourse with a child. Senior Magistrate Christy Barau condemned the act as 'animalistic, inhuman, and heartless,' emphasizing the need for strict punishment to deter similar crimes. The men were arrested by the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and faced trial after admitting guilt but failing to present a defense. The court accepted evidence including witness testimonies, medical reports, and recorded statements. One defendant remains at large and was sentenced in absentia. This case highlights ongoing concerns about child sexual abuse in Niger State.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a criminal case involving child rape and does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents the legal process, judicial reasoning, and the severity of the crime without overtly favoring any political perspective. The framing is primarily factual, focusing on the legal and司法

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): Factuality is very high with consistent details across sources. Objectivity is lower due to strong emotive language such as 'animalistic, inhuman, and heartless' which suggests a biased tone.

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
Four get 95-year jail terms for rape in Niger

Four men from Kontagora town in Niger State, Nigeria, were sentenced to a combined 95 years in prison for gang-raping a 13-year-old girl. The defendants—Salisu Shehu Baura, Lawali Shaibu, Haruna Musa Saidu, and Bello—were found guilty of unlawful sexual intercourse with a child and joint acts of rape. Bello was sentenced in absentia and remains at large after being granted bail. The prosecution presented evidence including video recordings of the suspects' confessions, medical reports, and witness testimonies from the victim, her father, and an investigator. The presiding magistrate condemned the crime as 'animalistic and heartless,' emphasizing the need for strict punishment to deter similar offenses. The Nigerian state government praised the ruling as a significant step in combating sexual violence and child abuse.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal proceeding with no overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It includes direct quotes from the court and mentions both the prosecution's arguments and the defense's plea for leniency. The judicial decision is reported neutrally, focusing on the

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factuality is high as the article provides detailed sentencing information and aligns with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is slightly lower due to emotionally charged language like 'animalistic and heartless' which may reflect bias.

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
Court sentence four rapists to 95 years imprisonment in Niger

A Nigerian court has sentenced four men to a combined total of 95 years in prison for gang-raping a 13-year-old girl in Kontagora, Niger State. The defendants—Salisu Shehu Baura, Lawali Shaibu, Haruna Musa Saidu, and Bello—were apprehended by the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and faced charges under sections 97 of the penal code and section 26(1) of the Child Rights Law. Bello, who was granted bail, remains at large. During the trial, prosecutors presented evidence including video recordings, written statements, a medical report, and witness testimonies from the victim, her father, and the investigating officer. The presiding magistrate condemned the crime as 'animalistic and heartless,' emphasizing the need for deterrence. The defense argued for leniency due to the perpetrators' expressed remorse, but the court rejected this, noting that remorse does not excuse criminal behavior. The state government praised the ruling as a significant step in combating such crimes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal proceeding without overt ideological slant. It reports on the sentencing of offenders, the judicial process, and the response from authorities without favoring any particular political stance. The tone is objective, focusing on the legal outcome and其

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is good with similar details to other reports. Objectivity is lower due to repetitive phrasing and emotionally charged descriptions that lack neutrality.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories