ON
← Back to feed
Court remands ex-NBA chairman in DSS custody
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter14 days ago

Court remands ex-NBA chairman in DSS custody

A former Chairman of the Nigeria Bar Association, Gabriel Nkup Tsenyen, has been remanded in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) by the Federal High Court in Abuja while the court determines whether he can face a new arraignment on charges of cyberstalking and incitement of public disturbances. Tsenyen's defense argued that he had previously been arraigned on similar charges, which were adjourned until September 28, and warned that allowing the new arraignment could constitute double jeopardy. However, the prosecution claimed they were unaware of prior charges. The court requested documentation of the earlier case to assess if Tsenyen had indeed been arraigned on these allegations before. Until this information is provided, Tsenyen remains in DSS custody.

A federal high court in Abuja has ordered the remand of Gabriel Nkup Tsenyen, a former chairman of the Nigeria Bar Association's Shendam branch in Plateau State, into the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS). The decision came after a legal battle over whether Tsenyen, who is also a prominent figure in the All Progressives Congress in Plateau State, should face new charges related to cyberstalking and incitement of public disturbances. Justice Joyce Abdulmalik set August 20 as the date to decide whether the fresh arraignment is valid and whether Tsenyen can be tried again on these allegations. Tsenyen was brought before the court following an effort by the DSS to charge him with two counts involving cyberstalking and incitement to breach public peace. However, his lead counsel, Senior Advocate of Nigeria Emmanuel Esene, raised objections during the hearing. He argued that his client had already been arraigned in the same court on similar charges and that the previous case had been scheduled for trial on September 28. Esene warned that allowing the new charges would subject his client to double jeopardy, a constitutional protection against being tried twice for the same offense. Counsel for the DSS, Muinat Oladunjoye, representing the prosecution from the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, claimed she was unaware of any prior charges against Tsenyen. This discrepancy prompted Justice Abdulmalik to request a copy of the earlier charge from the defense. Esene presented the relevant documents, prompting the judge to ask for the record of proceedings from the initial case to assess whether Tsenyen had indeed been arraigned on the same allegations. The defense informed the court that they were unable to provide the record immediately, citing that the new charges had come as a surprise on Thursday, August 13. As a result, Justice Abdulmalik ordered that the record of proceedings from the earlier trial be submitted by August 20. Until then, Tsenyen remained in DSS custody. The fresh charges were filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Iseoluwa Oyedepo. In the first count, the prosecution alleges that Tsenyen sent a malicious publication on the Ngootuguut local community WhatsApp platform in May 2026, claiming that the entire community was involved in a plot to eliminate him. According to the prosecution, Tsenyen knew the publication to be false and sent it "for the purpose of causing annoyance, insult, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, ill will and needless anxiety" within the community. This alleged act is said to violate Section 24(1) of the Cybercrimes (Prevention, Prohibition, etc.) Act, 2015, as amended. In the second count, the prosecution claims that Tsenyen sent the same publication "with intent to incite or cause breach to public peace." This alleged offense is said to contravene and be punishable under Section 114 of the Penal Code Act, 2004. On August 20, the court will examine several key issues, including whether the new charges pertain to allegations for which Tsenyen had previously been arraigned and whether the proposed retrial is legally permissible. The outcome of this hearing will have significant implications for Tsenyen's legal standing and the broader interpretation of double jeopardy protections in Nigerian law.

1 reports

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8014 days ago
Court remands ex-NBA chairman in DSS custody

A former Chairman of the Nigeria Bar Association, Gabriel Nkup Tsenyen, has been remanded in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) by the Federal High Court in Abuja while the court determines whether he can face a new arraignment on charges of cyberstalking and incitement of public disturbances. Tsenyen's defense argued that he had previously been arraigned on similar charges, which were adjourned until September 28, and warned that allowing the new arraignment could constitute double jeopardy. However, the prosecution claimed they were unaware of prior charges. The court requested documentation of the earlier case to assess if Tsenyen had indeed been arraigned on these allegations before. Until this information is provided, Tsenyen remains in DSS custody.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings involving a prominent individual with ties to a major political party, but it maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the judicial process and presenting both the defense and prosecution's arguments without apparent bias. There is no overtly loaded language,煽

Why factuality (75): The article provides a detailed account of a court proceeding involving Gabriel Nkup Tsenyen, including the legal arguments presented by both defense and prosecution. It accurately reports the sequence of events, including the objection raised by the defense counsel regarding double jeopardy. Howeve

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the legal arguments from both sides fairly, without evident bias. The tone remains professional and focused on the procedural aspects of the court case. There is no overt emotional language or one-sided framing, maintaining a balanced perspective.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories