ON
← Back to feed
Court convicts two of impersonating EFCC officers, sets date for sentencing
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter16 hr. ago

Court convicts two of impersonating EFCC officers, sets date for sentencing

The FCT High Court in Abuja has convicted two men, Haruna Mamuda and Sadiq Umar, of impersonating officers of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to defraud members of the public. Both pleaded guilty to charges including criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and unlawful representation. The charges stem from allegations that they falsely claimed to be EFCC operatives in March to deceive the public. The prosecution argued that their actions violated sections of the Penal Code Act. Their lawyers requested leniency, citing cooperation with authorities and lack of prior convictions. The court set a sentencing date for 22 July and ordered the defendants' continued detention by the EFCC. Separately, another judge adjourned the trial of two additional suspects, Ojobo Joshua and Aliyu Hashim, who are accused of similar offenses involving fraud totaling $700,000.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) re-arraigned former Skye Bank chairman Tunde Ayeni on Thursday before the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Apo, Abuja, marking the third time he has entered a plea to charges of fraud involving N15.6 billion. The arraignment followed an amendment to the charges, which increased the number of counts from 17 to 18. During the proceeding, Mr Ayeni pleaded not guilty to the allegations of criminal breach of trust, misappropriation, and diversion of funds. The EFCC is prosecuting him on 18 charges related to the alleged misuse of Skye Bank’s resources. The EFCC first arraigned Mr Ayeni on 4 May, after which the court remanded him in prison pending the outcome of his bail application. He was re-arraigned on 22 June and again on Thursday. According to the EFCC’s Head of Media and Publicity, Dele Oyewale, the defendant was informed of the charges and responded by pleading not guilty. The charges allege that while serving as chairperson of the defunct Skye Bank Plc, now known as Polaris Bank Limited, Mr Ayeni directed the transfer of N3.11 billion from the bank’s suspense account to Misa Limited’s account with Zenith Bank in November 2014. Another charge alleges that he orchestrated the transfer of approximately N5 billion to Greenwich Registrars’ account with Union Bank in December 2014. These actions are alleged to constitute criminal breach of trust under the Penal Code. During the arraignment, the EFCC’s lawyer, Abba Muhammed, stated that the prosecution was prepared to begin the trial and that its first witness was present in court. However, Mr Ayeni’s legal representative, Olalekan Ojo, objected to the immediate commencement of the trial, citing that the prosecution had not yet filed the summary of the witness’s statement. The prosecution countered that the summary had been submitted along with the second amended charge. Judge Jude Onwuegbuzie ruled that the prosecution had met the required procedural standards and scheduled the trial for 20, 22, and 23 July. Mr Ayeni served as chairperson of Skye Bank until July 2016, when the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) intervened due to the bank’s declining financial health. The CBN later revoked Skye Bank’s license and transferred its assets and liabilities to Polaris Bank, a bridge bank created by the regulator. Mr Ayeni did not continue with Polaris Bank following the intervention. The EFCC’s investigation into his conduct began after examining transactions conducted while he chaired the bank’s board. The commission alleges that billions of naira were improperly moved from the bank’s suspense account to entities linked to other defendants, violating the bank’s internal policies and regulatory guidelines. Mr Ayeni has consistently denied these allegations and maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings. The case against Mr Ayeni stems from the EFCC’s broader efforts to combat financial crimes within the banking sector. The commission has previously highlighted cases involving high-profile individuals and institutions, often resulting in substantial fines or imprisonment. This trial represents one such effort to hold former executives accountable for alleged misconduct. The ongoing legal battle underscores the complexities of prosecuting financial crimes, particularly when dealing with large sums and multiple layers of corporate structure. The outcome of this case could have implications for future investigations into similar allegations.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Premium Times Nigeria logoPremium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 884 days ago
Court convicts two of impersonating EFCC officers, sets date for sentencing

The FCT High Court in Abuja has convicted two men, Haruna Mamuda and Sadiq Umar, of impersonating officers of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to defraud members of the public. Both pleaded guilty to charges including criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and unlawful representation. The charges stem from allegations that they falsely claimed to be EFCC operatives in March to deceive the public. The prosecution argued that their actions violated sections of the Penal Code Act. Their lawyers requested leniency, citing cooperation with authorities and lack of prior convictions. The court set a sentencing date for 22 July and ordered the defendants' continued detention by the EFCC. Separately, another judge adjourned the trial of two additional suspects, Ojobo Joshua and Aliyu Hashim, who are accused of similar offenses involving fraud totaling $700,000.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal proceedings involving individuals accused of impersonating EFCC officers, which relates to public corruption and law enforcement. However, the content remains factual, balanced, and does not exhibit clear ideological bias. It presents the legal process, the charges, and酌

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the court's conviction of two men for impersonating EFCC officers, including legal details, charges, and procedural aspects. It reflects the cross-source consensus regarding the legal implications of such impersonation. The reporting is detailed and based on court proc

Why objectivity (88): While the article remains largely objective, there is a slight tilt towards the defense arguments when mentioning pleas for leniency, which may indicate some level of empathy toward the defendants. However, this is common in legal reporting and does not significantly affect overall objectivity.

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 9016 hr. ago
EFCC debunks viral ‘Secret Recruitment’ rumour, urges Nigerians to ignore false claim

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Nigeria has denied a viral social media rumor claiming it was conducting a secret recruitment drive. The EFCC clarified the claim via its verified X account, labeling the post as 'FAKE NEWS' and urging Nigerians to ignore the false information. The rumor falsely stated that the agency had begun secret recruitment and encouraged users to send anonymous messages for more details. The EFCC emphasized that all its recruitment processes are transparent and officially announced, rejecting claims of covert operations. It warned against relying on unverified social media content and advised verifying information through its official channels.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual correction from an official source (EFCC) regarding a false rumor. While the subject involves government agencies and public trust, the framing remains neutral, focusing on debunking misinformation rather than promoting a political agenda. The tone is cautionary and ap

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that the EFCC debunked a viral rumor about secret recruitment, citing their official statement and providing details of the false claim. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that such rumors are often spread by fraudsters. The article presents facts without embell

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the EFCC’s official stance without expressing personal opinion or bias. It provides factual information and quotes the commission’s statements without emotive language.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories