ON
← Back to feed
Court clears way for sexual harassment complaint against ex-NT judge
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 hr. ago

Court clears way for sexual harassment complaint against ex-NT judge

The Federal Court in Australia has allowed a sexual harassment complaint against a former Northern Territory Supreme Court judge to proceed, dismissing the judge's claim that the statute of limitations barred the case. The complainant, a former court associate, alleges that over a decade ago, the judge made inappropriate remarks about her appearance, asked personal questions, and suggested sharing a bed to save money. The NT Anti-Discrimination Commission initially accepted the complaint, but the ex-judge, referred to as RST, challenged the decision, arguing the 12-month time limit for complaints had expired. Federal Court Justice Mark Moshinsky ruled in favor of the commission, stating that RST's arguments did not justify overturning the decision. He also expressed a provisional view that RST should cover the complainant's legal costs. The case will now go back to the NT Anti-Discrimination Commission for mediation, with potential escalation to the NT Civil and Administrative Tribunal if no resolution is reached. The delegate noted that the delay in filing the complaint was due to the complainant believing there were no viable avenues to hold a judge accountable, especially before

1 reports

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenter10 hr. ago
Court clears way for sexual harassment complaint against ex-NT judge

The Federal Court in Australia has allowed a sexual harassment complaint against a former Northern Territory Supreme Court judge to proceed, dismissing the judge's claim that the statute of limitations barred the case. The complainant, a former court associate, alleges that over a decade ago, the judge made inappropriate remarks about her appearance, asked personal questions, and suggested sharing a bed to save money. The NT Anti-Discrimination Commission initially accepted the complaint, but the ex-judge, referred to as RST, challenged the decision, arguing the 12-month time limit for complaints had expired. Federal Court Justice Mark Moshinsky ruled in favor of the commission, stating that RST's arguments did not justify overturning the decision. He also expressed a provisional view that RST should cover the complainant's legal costs. The case will now go back to the NT Anti-Discrimination Commission for mediation, with potential escalation to the NT Civil and Administrative Tribunal if no resolution is reached. The delegate noted that the delay in filing the complaint was due to the complainant believing there were no viable avenues to hold a judge accountable, especially before

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and arguments from both the complainant and the ex-judge without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the court ruling and explains the legal reasoning behind allowing the complaint to proceed. There is no evident bias in the framing

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories