Court affirms Gbenga Hashim as Accord Party presidential candidate

Vanguard NigeriaIndependentCenter2 hr. ago

A Nigerian federal high court has ruled in favor of Dr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, affirming him as the presidential candidate of the Accord Party for the 2027 election. The court dismissed challenges to Hashim's candidacy, rejecting claims that the party had canceled its presidential primary. Justice Mohammed Umar ruled that the purported cancellation letter lacked proper authentication and ordered the Accord Party to register Hashim with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Hashim had argued that the party's refusal to recognize his victory in the May 30, 2026 primary violated electoral laws and regulations. His legal team emphasized the lack of official validation for the cancellation notice, while the party claimed the primary had been canceled altogether.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a court ruling regarding a political party's candidate selection process. It includes both the plaintiff's arguments and the defendant's counterarguments without overtly favoring either side. The language remains neutral, focusing on legal procedures and the

The PunchIndependentCenter3 hr. ago

A Nigerian federal high court has ruled that Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim is the legitimate presidential candidate of the Accord Party for the upcoming 2027 election. The court ordered the party to submit his name to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), rejecting the party's claim that the primary was canceled. Justice Mohammed Garba Umar found that the party violated the Electoral Act 2026 by failing to recognize Olawepo-Hashim as the winner of the May 30, 2026, primary. The ruling was based on evidence such as payments made by Olawepo-Hashim for nomination forms and contradictions in the party's claims regarding the cancellation of the primary. Counsel for Olawepo-Hashim argued that documents provided by the party and INEC were fabricated.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal decision regarding a political party's candidate selection process. It provides both sides' arguments and the court's reasoning without overtly favoring either the plaintiff or the defendant. The language remains neutral, focusing on the legal framework and evidence, and