ON
← Back to feed
Country asking him to apologise but he has forgiven country: Congress' dig at PM over new video
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive22 days ago

Country asking him to apologise but he has forgiven country: Congress' dig at PM over new video

In a statement on July 31, 2026, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed recent protests related to NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) irregularities, where he claimed he and his late mother were subjected to abusive language at Jantar Mantar. Modi emphasized that taking legal action against the protesting students would not resolve the issue and expressed a desire to 'forgive' those involved, calling them 'misguided children.' In response, Congress leader Pawan Khera criticized Modi's approach, highlighting the contrast between the public's expectation for an apology and Modi's decision to forgive the protesters. Khera shared Modi’s video message on social media, pointing out the perceived inconsistency in Modi's stance. Modi reiterated his belief that guiding the youth toward the correct path is more important than punitive measures.

A recent video message from Prime Minister Narendra Modi sparked controversy and political commentary, drawing comparisons to historical protest movements. In the clip, Mr. Modi addressed ongoing tensions surrounding the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) irregularities, describing the situation as one of "misguided children" and expressing a desire to forgive those involved. His remarks came amid widespread protests at Jantar Mantar, a historic site in New Delhi known for its role in public demonstrations. The video, released on July 31, 2026, saw Mr. Modi recounting personal experiences of being subjected to abusive language at Jantar Mantar during the protests. He claimed both he and his late mother faced verbal abuse, though he emphasized that such actions would not resolve the underlying issues. Instead, he called for guidance and forgiveness, stating that it was their duty to lead the youth toward the correct path. This sentiment was echoed in his assertion that dragging individuals into legal proceedings would not address societal concerns. In response, the opposition Congress party launched a sharp critique of the prime minister’s approach. Pawan Khera, head of the Congress’ media and publicity department, posted on social media in Hindi, highlighting the irony of the situation. According to Khera, while the nation was urging the PM to apologize, he had instead chosen to forgive the country. The post included a direct reference to Mr. Modi’s video, suggesting a disconnect between the government’s stance and public expectations. Khera’s comments were part of a broader strategy by the Congress to challenge the narrative around the handling of the NEET issue. The party accused the government of failing to engage constructively with protesters and instead resorting to rhetoric that downplayed the grievances of the youth. The exchange underscored growing divisions between the ruling party and its critics, particularly regarding how best to manage public dissent. The protests at Jantar Mantar have long been associated with major socio-political movements in India. From the anti-colonial struggles of the early 20th century to more recent demonstrations against policy changes, the site has served as a symbolic space for collective expression. The current unrest, however, centers on the perceived unfairness of the NEET process, which many students argue undermines merit-based admissions and creates barriers for marginalized groups. The debate over the NEET system reflects deeper concerns about educational equity and the role of state institutions in shaping opportunities. Protests have escalated in recent months, with participants demanding transparency, accountability, and reform. The government, meanwhile, has framed the issue as one of national interest, emphasizing the need for standardized testing to ensure uniformity in higher education. As tensions continue to mount, the government faces mounting pressure to address the demands of the protesting students. While Mr. Modi’s call for forgiveness may resonate with some segments of the population, others view it as dismissive of the legitimate frustrations voiced by the youth. The Congress’ criticism highlights the political stakes involved, with the opposition positioning itself as a defender of student rights and democratic discourse. Looking ahead, the situation remains fluid. The government may seek to de-escalate the protests through dialogue or policy adjustments, while the opposition continues to push for greater engagement and transparency. The outcome of these developments will likely shape the trajectory of public sentiment and political dynamics in the coming weeks. For now, the focus remains on the evolving narrative around Jantar Mantar and the broader implications of how societies respond to dissent.

3 reports

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6025 days ago
Why protests so often turn to shame and sexual ridicule: From French Revolution to Jantar Mantar

The article explores the historical and contemporary use of shame and sexual ridicule as tactics within protest movements. It draws parallels between past events such as the French Revolution and modern-day demonstrations at locations like Jantar Mantar in India. The piece examines how these methods are employed to undermine opponents, provoke embarrassment, or draw attention to social issues. It highlights the psychological impact of such strategies on both participants and observers, while also considering their effectiveness in achieving political goals.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced historical overview without taking a clear stance on any particular political issue. It analyzes the use of shame and sexual ridicule across different eras and regions without favoring one perspective over another.

Why factuality (75): The article discusses historical examples of protests turning to shame and sexual ridicule, referencing the French Revolution and Jantar Mantar. However, it lacks specific details about the current event being discussed, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy against a cross-source consensus

Why objectivity (60): The tone of the article leans towards a critical perspective on protest behavior, suggesting a potential bias. While it presents historical examples, it frames the discussion in a way that may imply a judgment on modern protest tactics, rather than presenting a balanced view.

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 5022 days ago
Country asking him to apologise but he has forgiven country: Congress' dig at PM over new video

In a statement on July 31, 2026, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed recent protests related to NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) irregularities, where he claimed he and his late mother were subjected to abusive language at Jantar Mantar. Modi emphasized that taking legal action against the protesting students would not resolve the issue and expressed a desire to 'forgive' those involved, calling them 'misguided children.' In response, Congress leader Pawan Khera criticized Modi's approach, highlighting the contrast between the public's expectation for an apology and Modi's decision to forgive the protesters. Khera shared Modi’s video message on social media, pointing out the perceived inconsistency in Modi's stance. Modi reiterated his belief that guiding the youth toward the correct path is more important than punitive measures.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critique of the Prime Minister's actions by a major opposition party, highlighting a perceived contradiction between public expectations and the PM's response. The framing emphasizes the opposition's perspective, suggesting a left-leaning interpretation of the situation.

Why factuality (50): This article discusses Congress' response to PM Modi's 'forgive children' video, unrelated to the Jharkhand student protests. It contains no information about the primary source document's event, thus scoring mid-range for factuality.

Why objectivity (50): The article presents facts neutrally but focuses on a completely different topic than the primary source document, showing neither bias nor neutrality towards the Jharkhand protest event.

The Wire logoThe WireIndependentCenterFactual 0Objective 027 days ago
Night Shifts at Jantar Mantar

The article titled 'Night Shifts at Jantar Mantar' by The Wire (India) discusses the activities and security measures at Jantar Mantar, a prominent sit-in protest site in New Delhi. It highlights the increased police presence and surveillance efforts aimed at managing the protests, which have drawn attention due to their scale and political significance. The piece examines the challenges faced by authorities in maintaining order while balancing the rights of protesters. It also touches on the broader implications of such demonstrations for democratic expression and governance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation at Jantar Mantar, discussing both the actions of law enforcement and the nature of the protests. It does not overtly favor any particular political stance but focuses on the logistical and administrative challenges involved. While the subject is政

Why factuality (0): The article title is incomplete and lacks any substantive content. There is no information provided about the event or its details, making it impossible to assess factuality.

Why objectivity (0): The article is entirely empty, providing no content or analysis. Therefore, it cannot be assessed for objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories