Couble highlights the opposition's offensive against the TC for the mega-reform and emphasizes that the requested arrangements are already being worked on

The Supreme Court of Chile has granted three additional days to the opposition to correct formal issues in two of its three legal requests aimed at challenging President José Antonio Kast’s megareform. The decision comes after the court evaluated the constitutionality of the reform, which seeks to overhaul key aspects of the country's tax system and environmental regulations. The ruling was announced late Thursday, following a session where the court examined the admissibility of the three requests submitted by the opposition. The opposition, led by the coalition known as the Broad Front, had previously filed legal challenges targeting specific provisions of the megareform. These include clauses related to tax invariance and compensation for the annulment of Environmental Evaluation Resolutions (RCA). The Supreme Court found that two of the three requests required minor adjustments before they could proceed. As a result, the court decided, by majority vote, to grant the opposition three days to address these formalities. The third request, concerning articles 29 and 38 of the law, remains under review. Andrés Couble, the secretary-general of the Broad Front, commented on the court’s decision, emphasizing that the requested corrections were already being addressed. He stated that the process was moving forward and that the opposition was confident the court would eventually rule on the constitutional validity of the reform. “The request for endorsements from the court shows we are on the right track,” he said. “We expect the court to make a ruling in accordance with our constitution, and we are continuing along this path.” The megareform, introduced by President Kast, has been a contentious issue since its announcement last year. It aims to simplify the tax code and reduce administrative burdens on businesses while increasing government revenue. However, critics argue that the reform undermines environmental protections and violates constitutional principles regarding fiscal policy. The opposition has consistently opposed the measure, citing concerns over its impact on public services and social welfare programs. Legal experts have noted that the court’s decision to allow the opposition time to correct formalities does not necessarily indicate support for the reform. Instead, it reflects the procedural nature of such rulings, which often involve ensuring all parties meet legal standards before substantive arguments can be considered. The court’s focus on formal requirements suggests that the opposition’s legal strategy is being taken seriously, though the outcome of the case will depend on how effectively the opposition addresses the court’s concerns. The Broad Front, which includes several political parties and civil society groups, has maintained a unified stance against the megareform. They argue that the reform threatens the rights of citizens and weakens the state’s ability to provide essential services. Their legal challenge is part of a broader effort to prevent the implementation of policies they believe are unconstitutional and harmful to the public interest. As the opposition works to finalize their submissions, the Supreme Court will continue its evaluation of the megareform. The outcome of this legal battle could have far-reaching implications for Chile’s economic and environmental policies. With the court’s deadline approaching, all eyes remain on whether the opposition will successfully challenge the reform or if the government will prevail in its efforts to enact the legislation.