ON
← Back to feed
International criminal court
CL🏛️ PoliticsProgressive8 hr. ago

International criminal court

The article discusses the United States' announcement of a campaign aimed at dismantling the International Criminal Court (ICC), including imposing harsher sanctions on its officials and judges, and urging allied countries to withdraw from the treaty establishing the court. The European Union responded by condemning these threats as unacceptable. Meanwhile, Chile has remained silent on the issue despite being a traditional supporter of the ICC. Both the Boric and Piñera administrations have previously relied on the ICC for investigations into situations in Afghanistan and Venezuela, respectively. The author expresses concern that Chile’s support for the ICC during this period of vulnerability might not be as strong or timely as expected.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒Progressive8 hr. ago
International criminal court

The article discusses the United States' announcement of a campaign aimed at dismantling the International Criminal Court (ICC), including imposing harsher sanctions on its officials and judges, and urging allied countries to withdraw from the treaty establishing the court. The European Union responded by condemning these threats as unacceptable. Meanwhile, Chile has remained silent on the issue despite being a traditional supporter of the ICC. Both the Boric and Piñera administrations have previously relied on the ICC for investigations into situations in Afghanistan and Venezuela, respectively. The author expresses concern that Chile’s support for the ICC during this period of vulnerability might not be as strong or timely as expected.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the US actions against the ICC as negative and criticizes Chile's silence on the matter, implying that Chile should take a stronger stance in support of international justice. This framing aligns with left-leaning values emphasizing multilateralism and international cooperation.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories