ON
← Back to feed
'Cool in 90 seconds' - the fake portable air conditioners sweeping the internet
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 days ago

'Cool in 90 seconds' - the fake portable air conditioners sweeping the internet

As the UK faces another hot weekend, fake portable air conditioners are being sold online through misleading advertisements that claim to cool rooms rapidly and use advanced technology. These ads, often found on Facebook and YouTube, feature exaggerated claims and fake customer reviews. YouTuber Stuart Matthews tested these devices and found they were essentially cheap fans with flawed engineering. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has warned about the deceptive nature of these ads, noting they often use AI-generated visuals to appear more sophisticated. While the ASA monitors and enforces against such advertising, it lacks the authority to impose fines directly.

A wave of misleading advertisements for so-called "portable air conditioners" has been circulating online, promising rapid cooling capabilities that many experts say are far from reality. These ads, which have appeared prominently on social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube, claim the devices can cool a room in just 90 seconds and are even marketed as being designed by former NASA engineers. However, these claims have drawn scrutiny from regulatory bodies and independent testers alike, raising concerns about deceptive marketing practices during a time when demand for cooling solutions is high due to rising temperatures. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which oversees advertising standards in the United Kingdom, has issued warnings about these products after reviewing numerous online ads. The authority noted that many of the advertisements contain exaggerated claims, suggesting that small devices can cool entire homes within minutes or operate with minimal energy consumption. Additionally, the ads often feature fabricated customer testimonials that describe significant temperature reductions and impressive performance metrics. These claims appear to be designed to entice consumers looking for quick relief from the summer heat. YouTuber and civil engineer Stuart Matthews conducted his own investigation into these products after purchasing several units to test their effectiveness. According to Matthews, the devices did not deliver on their promises. Instead of providing rapid cooling, he discovered that the machines were essentially basic fans priced around £70. His analysis revealed that the internal components were rudimentary, consisting largely of cardboard fins that become damp as air passes over them. This design resembles that of "swamp coolers," which function by evaporating water to lower air temperature. However, these devices are most effective in arid environments and are generally unsuitable for regions with higher humidity levels, such as much of the UK. Matthews emphasized that the products sold under the guise of advanced cooling technology are, in fact, poorly constructed and based on flawed scientific principles. He expressed concern for individuals who might fall victim to these misleading advertisements, believing they are acquiring ineffective devices while expecting real cooling benefits. The disparity between the promised functionality and the actual performance of these products highlights the need for greater consumer awareness and stricter regulation of online advertising. The ASA has taken steps to address the issue by monitoring relevant websites and issuing enforcement notices to advertisers requiring them to comply with advertising regulations. While the agency does not have the power to impose financial penalties directly, it can ban advertisements that violate its guidelines. This action underscores the ongoing challenge faced by regulators in ensuring that online marketplaces remain free from deceptive practices. As the popularity of these dubious products continues to grow, there is increasing pressure on both platform providers and regulatory agencies to take stronger measures against false advertising. With the summer season approaching and temperatures expected to rise further, the importance of reliable cooling solutions becomes ever more critical. Consumers are advised to exercise caution when encountering such claims and to seek verified information before making purchases. The situation serves as a reminder of the potential risks associated with unregulated online commerce and the necessity for robust oversight mechanisms to protect public interests.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

BBC News (UK) logoBBC News (UK)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
'Cool in 90 seconds' - the fake portable air conditioners sweeping the internet

As the UK faces another hot weekend, fake portable air conditioners are being sold online through misleading advertisements that claim to cool rooms rapidly and use advanced technology. These ads, often found on Facebook and YouTube, feature exaggerated claims and fake customer reviews. YouTuber Stuart Matthews tested these devices and found they were essentially cheap fans with flawed engineering. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has warned about the deceptive nature of these ads, noting they often use AI-generated visuals to appear more sophisticated. While the ASA monitors and enforces against such advertising, it lacks the authority to impose fines directly.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the issue, focusing on factual reporting about misleading advertisements without overtly favoring any political stance. It includes quotes from a YouTuber and information from the Advertising Standards Authority, maintaining neutrality in its framing.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports on the fake air conditioners, references the ASA warnings, and includes quotes from a YouTuber who tested the products. Objectivity is slightly lower due to some emotionally charged language like 'too good to be true' and 'flawed science,' though

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories